Sentences with phrase «decisions of a family court judge»

They will never understand what it is like to lose their child because of the vindictive actions of an alienating spouse or the erroneous decisions of a family court judge.

Not exact matches

A federal district court, Judge Barbara Rothstein presiding, noted a long line of Supreme Court cases protecting «personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education.&rcourt, Judge Barbara Rothstein presiding, noted a long line of Supreme Court cases protecting «personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education.&rCourt cases protecting «personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education.»

The judge, who had analysed evidence at a trial in the Family Division of the High Court in London earlier this month, said he had reached his decision with «profound sadness».

He said: «The lower court's judges always hesitate to make decisions on the merit, or free people accused of blasphemy, and instead transfer their burden to the higher court without realizing how their decision will impact the accused and their families» lives.»

The lack of guidelines for the courts also creates inequality for families in that a decision made by one judge could be completely different from the decision made by another judge, so the outcome becomes a lottery for the child!

The case winds up in family court, mother and son fighting each other for custody, leaving the judge with the authority to decide the girl's fate, Courtroom drama follows, with Frank defended well by his lawyer, Fred Cullen (Glenn Plummer) and opposed by child welfare authority rep, and we do get to hear the decision of the court, allowing us to take sides as well.

Parents for Educational Freedom NC's president, Darryl Allison, said in a statement following Judge Hobgood's decision to halt the program while the merits of the case are decided, «while we respect the court's decision, we are deeply disappointed on behalf of the thousands of working - class families who desired this educational option,» he said.

In today's blog, high net worth family and divorce lawyer Lorne N. MacLean, QC,, reviews a recent BC Supreme Court decision where the judge commented on how assessing credibility in a trial involving the use of interpreters severely compromises a judge's ability to assess who is telling the truth.

Permission will now be required to appeal a family decision of a district judge (magistrates» courts) or lay beaks (FPAR 2).

Nicola Walker, partner at Irwin Mitchell Private Wealth, who acted for Mrs Hart, said: «The decision of the Court of Appeal leaves the law in a state of flux; it allows a trial judge to find that even where it is not properly evidenced, the financial contribution of one spouse outweighs the family and domestic contribution of the other.

The judge, Lyris Younge of Philadelphia Family Court, abused her discretion when she refused to place the child known as N.M. in the care of a grandmother, according to the May 4 decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

If one reads the comments on the Charleston Post and Courier's web site regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission's preliminary decision that Judge F.P. Segars - Andrews is unqualified to remain a family court judge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSBJudge F.P. Segars - Andrews is unqualified to remain a family court judge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSBjudge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSB-...]

This is because trial judges in family law matters have wide discretion in a lot of the fine points of alimony decisions, much of it exercised at the trial court level that does not generate binding legal precedents and is not widely available to researchers.

And in court, you put your family's future in the hands of a judge who often reviews your case only briefly before making lasting decisions for you and your family.

Have some sympathy for Family Court Judge Leslie K. Riddle, whose decision in the case of Marchant v. Marchant, 390 S.C. 1, 699 S.E. 2d 708 (Ct.App.

Tags: Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Child Support, Imputation of Income, Judge Leslie K. Riddle, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 3 Comments&raquof Income, Judge Leslie K. Riddle, South Carolina Court of Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 3 Comments&raquof Appeals Posted in Alimony / Spousal Support, Attorney's Fees, Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 3 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 3 Comments»

If you can not agree to terms of the divorce, a family court judge will issue decisions for you.

In Blackett v. Blackett (1989), 40 B.C.L.R. (2d) 99 (C.A.), the Court of Appeal overturned the trial judge's decision that the husband should pay compensation to the wife using the date of separation to value shares in a company found to be a family asset.

Being able to select the decision maker is a strong advantage over the random assignment of family court judges to trials.

Citing Gillespie v. Patterson, 2006 NSCA 133 (CanLII), a decision of Cromwell J.A. (as he then was) the Court of Appeal explained, ``... when it comes to family law, a child's best interests must always be an overriding consideration with significant deference to the trial judge» (para. 5).

Rule of Law Court of Appeal Varies Trial Decision in Chinn v. Hanrieder The Court of Appeal, in reasons for judgment released on June 27, 2013, in Chinn v. Hanrieder, 2013 BCCA 310 (CanLII), reversed the trial judge's holding that Ingrid Hanrieder held her interest in a family trust that held mineral rights on a secret trust for her late husband's two children, Bette Chinn and Dennis Hanrieder.

Mediation Services (for the 20 % of today's families who need help making decisions): Half of the families who regularly use family court systems are mostly seeking minor assistance in making their separation plans (marital settlement agreements) and don't really need a judge.

Family Court judges should consider the impact of violence on families when making decisions about child custody and visitation, according to Kristine Lizdas, a managing attorney at the Battered Women's Justice Project.

Family court judges in the U.S. base decisions in custody rulings on what is in the best interest of the child.

However, California does not establish a preference or a presumption for or against joint custody or custody to one parent, and therefore leaves the parenting plan decision up to the discretion of the family court or judge.

In discussions with Judge LaRose, I have learned that he believes most families should try to resolve issues related to divorce outside of court, and that they should only resort to a judge imposed decision as a last reJudge LaRose, I have learned that he believes most families should try to resolve issues related to divorce outside of court, and that they should only resort to a judge imposed decision as a last rejudge imposed decision as a last resort.

One of the toughest decisions family court judges must make happens when parent battle for custody of the children.

Mediation is a form of dispute resolution that offers many advantages over litigating your divorce in a family court trial, where you are bound by the judge's decision.

Appeals from family law and child support decisions of the Federal Circuit Court are usually heard by a single judge of the Family family law and child support decisions of the Federal Circuit Court are usually heard by a single judge of the Family Family Court.

If your divorce can not be resolved outside of court, we have the experience and strategies to prepare your case for presentation to a judge, who can then make enlightened decisions based upon the facts that are important for your family to succeed following the divorce.

The family court in Shawnee county, KS has some serious issues with reacting impulsively and approving sole custody by default because the other parent was not there... knowing they aren't dead, realizing that 2 notices were sent and returned with «not at this address» so parent was probably only absent because they never received word of this very important, life altering hearing - not because they felt they were above the law as indicated via court records then to seal the final decision, the judge shouldve reviewed any past files taking note of any past complaints / concerns to the court regarding alienating parent doing just that and automatically recommend a continuation and make clear that court was not to move forward until they get a hold of the absent parent and allow them their right to be there... because that would've been 100 % in the best interest of the child.

The decision on custody of the children is one of the most difficult decisions that a South Carolina family court judge has to make.