Decisions on policy matters that may be opposed by a new government must be postponed until after the election, calling into question the ability of the Department for Education (DfE) to sign funding agreements or land contracts for new free schools until after June 8, especially given Labour's opposition to the programme.
Not exact matches
«[A] most every kind of public
policy decision [today is] made as a
matter of a cost - benefit ratio,» governance advocate Robert A. G. Monks, explained in a 2008 interview published
on the website Social Funds.
It is difficult to take proper account of the myriad relevant factors in making
decisions on even relatively minor
matters like diet, let alone such major concerns as foreign
policy or population control.
Two days after the Obergefell
decision, New York Times columnist Mark Oppenheimer suggested that it is now time to rethink the idea of tax - exempt status for religious institutions: «Rather than try to rescue tax - exempt status for organizations that dissent from settled public
policy on matters of....
Two days after the Obergefell
decision, New York Times columnist Mark Oppenheimer suggested that it is now time to rethink the idea of tax - exempt status for religious institutions: «Rather than try to rescue tax - exempt status for organizations that dissent from settled public
policy on matters of race or sexuality, we need to take a more radical step.
As individuals demonstrated their ability to administer such
matters, they would more and more be relied
on; but the congregation as a whole would be expected to determine
policy at every point and often, no doubt, would be called
on to make ad hoc
decisions in questionable cases.
Moreover, as Dr. Joyce Slater, a guest blogger
on Weighty
Matters, later pointed out with respect to the Ritz crackers incident, daycare workers are often greatly overburdened and undereducated when it comes to making the
decisions required of them under Manitoba's well - meaning nutrition
policies.
And dozens of emails introduced at trial show Percoco weighing in
on state
decisions both big and small, from hiring to
policy matters.
«It's really critically important that you're able to convey accurately what the president's
policy is
on a
matter and why the president feels this way or makes this
decision,» Lane said.
DAAD supports the internationalization of German universities, promotes German studies and the German language abroad, assists developing countries in establishing effective universities and advises
decision makers
on matters of cultural, education and development
policy.
At 1.5 / 2 °C temperature warming level, how the global and regional climate will change, is a
matter of public concern and relates to the
decisions of
policies, guidelines and measures
on mitigation and adaption of future climate change.
And in this case, its effect
on policy implementation in cities across the nation would
matter: we'd see greater prudence in the process of deliberation, improved communication to stakeholders, and more thoughtful and respectful execution of an undesirable but ultimately necessary
decision.
Highly influential school effectiveness studies120 asserted that effective schools are characterized by an climate or culture oriented toward learning, as expressed in high achievement standards and expectations of students, an emphasis
on basic skills, a high level of involvement in
decision making and professionalism among teachers, cohesiveness, clear
policies on matters such as homework and student behaviors, and so
on.121 All this implied changes in the principal «s role.
Teachers are not being provided with basic information
on pay
matters and the concept of schools having an individual pay
policy, locally determined and setting out how
decisions involving the use of discretion will be taken, is still very far from being established and recognised (let alone accepted) among teachers.
(b) Although districts retain the court's deference
on matters of educational Page 2
policy, parents of special education students and their attorneys may likely test the waters
on applying the SCOTUS
decision in the Endrew F. case.
That
decision itself could be considered a
policy matter because not voting
on the union's request for recognition would have the same effect as voting it down.
In Stefan's words: «Once an overall long - term goal has been defined, it is a
matter of science to determine what emissions trajectories are compatible...» By separating the
decision on «long - term» goal from the «
matter of science» to turn the crank and determine trajectories misunderstands how real goals function in nearly every area of complex and expensive
policy coordination.
This principle allows
policy makers to make discretionary
decisions in situations where there is the possibility of harm from taking a particular course or making a certain
decision when extensive scientific knowledge
on the
matter is lacking.
Policies to address climate change would affect both consumption and investment, but for the purposes of evaluation what matters is the effect on investment, since it is the effect of policies on investment decisions that will determine rates of innovation and hence economic growth, the ability to adapt to climate change, and future cons
Policies to address climate change would affect both consumption and investment, but for the purposes of evaluation what
matters is the effect
on investment, since it is the effect of
policies on investment decisions that will determine rates of innovation and hence economic growth, the ability to adapt to climate change, and future cons
policies on investment
decisions that will determine rates of innovation and hence economic growth, the ability to adapt to climate change, and future consumption.
I wanted to argue that it really doesn't
matter whether you are a fan of wind energy or not; the
decisions about our energy
policy are neither dependent
on public opinion, nor controlled by it.
Public
policy dictates that prosecutors in criminal and disciplinary
matters be given considerable leeway in
decisions on whether to initiate or continue proceedings.
In reaching this
decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary
on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a
matter of
policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions
on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».
Where the question of the impact of a particular measure
on social and economic
matters has not been addressed by the Government Department responsible for a particular
policy choice, the imperative for reticence
on the part of a court tasked with the duty of reviewing the
decision is diminished.
While punting issues to the membership may be appropriate where the
decision involves
matters of
policy (say, in establishing a rule
on how many hours of CPD time lawyers are required to obtain or in approving new rules of professional conduct or bylaws) rather than administrative decisins involving a weighing of Charter values, in these sort of circumstances, it's hard to see how the
decision in BC or NB can survive judicial scrutiny (even if one doesn't believe that the earlier SCC decisionin TWU doesn't govern).
Such
decisions involve
matters of
policy, and decide «polycentric» questions dependent
on the balancing and resolution of a variety of competing factors.
She regularly advises employers
on collective agreement interpretation and grievances, drafting employment contracts and workplace
policies, employee discipline and termination
decisions, managing medical leaves and accommodation requests, occupational health and safety prevention
matters and appeals, privacy law and critical incident management.
Instead of making a new determination, the new Tribunal will then send the
matter back to Council to make a
decision based
on the applicable planning
policies.
[11] Indeed, there are less - intense and more - intense variants of Wednesbury, [12] so - called super-Wednesbury review reserved for
matters of high
policy [13] and so - called sub-Wednesbury review requiring «anxious scrutiny» of
decisions having an impact
on important rights.
But
on factual and
policy matters falling within the specialized expertise of a
decision - maker, it is clear, at least in Canada, that deference is now owed even
on pure questions of law and constitutional
matters.
(4) A relevant
decision may not be taken except
on imperative grounds of public security in respect of an EEA national who: (a) has resided in the UK for a continuous period of at least 10 years before the relevant
decision; or... (5) Where a relevant
decision is taken
on grounds of public
policy or public security it shall, in addition to complying with the preceding paragraphs of this regulation, be taken in accordance with the following principles --(a) the
decision must comply with the principle of proportionality; (b) the
decision must be based exclusively
on the personal conduct of the person concerned; (c) the personal conduct of the person concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society; (d)
matters isolated from the particulars of the case or which relate to considerations of general prevention do not justify the
decision; and (e) a person's previous criminal convictions do not in themselves justify the
decision.
Although producing HIPs should not present firms with any particular difficulties, the
policy decision on whether or not to produce HIPs is a
matter of priority.
Rix LJ cited with approval a passage in De Smith's Judicial Review (6th edition, 2007, at paras 10 - 065ff) and headed:
Policy and Bias, which noted that decision - makers are entitled «to exhibit certain kinds of bias in the exercise of their judgment or discretion on matters of public policy» and while ordinary members of legislative bodies are «entitled, and sometimes expected, to show political bias» they of course ought not to show personal bias or participate in decisions on a matter in which they have a private pecuniary or proprietary int
Policy and Bias, which noted that
decision - makers are entitled «to exhibit certain kinds of bias in the exercise of their judgment or discretion
on matters of public
policy» and while ordinary members of legislative bodies are «entitled, and sometimes expected, to show political bias» they of course ought not to show personal bias or participate in decisions on a matter in which they have a private pecuniary or proprietary int
policy» and while ordinary members of legislative bodies are «entitled, and sometimes expected, to show political bias» they of course ought not to show personal bias or participate in
decisions on a
matter in which they have a private pecuniary or proprietary interest.
Such a
decision about the College's power to adopt the
policies was a
matter for review
on a standard of reasonableness.
Given the potential for qualified paralegals to enhance A2J for Canadians, it seems important to establish the basis for future
policy decisions on the regulation of paralegal work, no
matter the province.
The SEB discusses issues relevant to the management of the Institute and, in conjunction with the CEO, makes
decisions on policy, operational
matters and procedures that affect the organisation.