Not exact matches
I suspect he refers to the accounts of the failures of economies directed by
state elites
under the banner of «collective
decision making» and «workers democracy», because all the literature on REAL workers»
control shows it increases efficiency and, of course, freedom — it eliminates wage slavery.
«The PDP holds that the governor and the APC are jittery and unpopular of going into the grass roots elections in the
state, thus the
decisions to
control the councils by nomenclature of executive secretaries and sole administrators, which are alien and offensive to the provisions of our Constitution, which
under section 7 guarantees only democratically elected local government council administrations.»
The emails Cuomo sent yesterday give a very early clue to an argument he would likely make if he indeed decides to take a step onto the national stage:
Under my leadership, New York led the nation on touchstone progressive issues, not only becoming the largest
state in the country (before the US Supreme Court Prop. 8
decision) to legalize gay marriage, but also the first to act on gun
control in the wake of the horrific Newtown massacre.
Pataki has called for the money to be given to a
state entity he created to spur economic development in Niagara Falls, thus leaving the money
under his
control, a
decision that is opposed by local leaders.
The Long Island Republican is pretty much apoplectic over the
control board's unanimous
decision yesterday to put his county
under state oversight, insisting the move was politically motivated and born of the NIFA members» concern that his capable management will soon make them obsolete.
The
decision three years ago by President Barack Obama to not push for a budget for 2010 - 2011, a move to which Democrats who
controlled all of Congress at the time had acquiesced (even as it was clear that the party would lose
control of the federal lower house), has resulted in sequestration - triggered budget cuts that denies the administration funding it can leverage through competitive grant programs such as Race to the Top in order to force
states to fulfill their promises
under the waiver.
Although U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos took office in February pledging to let
states seize
control of key education policy
decisions under the new federal K - 12 law, her department's responses to
states» ESSA plans have surprised - and in some cases irritated -
state leaders and others.
WASHINGTON (May 2, 2018)-- The California Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) today announced its
decision to list spray polyurethane foam insulation (SPF) materials containing unreacted methylene diphenyl diisocyanates (MDI), a key component in SPF, as a Priority Product
under the
state's Safer Consumer Products (SCP) Program.
The
state is operated in public,
under the
control of public figures who depend on popularity and lavish funding from various interest groups (now free, by Supreme Court
decision, to operate in the dark) for their positions of power.
Seventh Circuit Rule 52 allows the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, when faced with «questions arising
under the laws of [a]
state which will
control the outcome of a case pending in the federal court» to «certify such a question to the
state court in accordance with the rules of that court» and to «stay the case... to await the
state court's
decision.»
In the United Kingdom High Court (Administrative)
decision of DD v Secretary of
State for Home Department [2014](«DD») Ouseley J was required to consider, on a preliminary basis, whether the imposition of a Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measure («TPIM»)(the successor of
control orders) had violated the appellant's right to freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment
under article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights («ECHR»).
In reaching this
decision the following were considered to be decisive factors: (i) LQHT was permeated with
state control and influence with a view to meeting the government's aims for aff ordable housing; (ii) the nature and extent of the public subsidy of LQHT's activities; (iii) 10 % of LQHT's stock had been transferred to it from the public sector; (iv) that LQHT, as a registered social landlord, was obliged to cooperate with the local authority, if requested, in offering accommodation to people with priority
under the authority's allocation scheme; (v) the termination of a tenancy could not be regarded as separate from housing management so as to be considered an act of a private nature.
Planned Parenthood Federation of America applauds the
decision by the United
States Department of Health and Human Services to ensure access to affordable birth
control, and not further expand the refusal provision to the birth
control coverage benefit
under the Affordable Care Act.