The MICRA unconstitutionality argument was long ago decided against attorney, with the appellate court determining nothing had changed to dissuade it from giving stare
decisis impact to Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc., 37 Cal.3 d 920, 923 (1985).
And while I'm retrospectively modifying my post, I will also re-imagine the
impact on its own potential for viral distribution had I dropped the sub-title, or gone with something a little more «of the moment» like: «Disrupting Stare
Decisis with a Harlem Shake» to underscore the power of the internet to redirect and hold your attention on new info or diversions.