But first, to recap: Last February, Fastcase preemptively filed
the declaratory judgment lawsuit in federal court in Atlanta after Casemaker served it a written notice demanding it take down from its research collection the Georgia Administrative Rules and Regulations.
But first, to recap: Last February, Fastcase preemptively filed
the declaratory judgment lawsuit in -LSB-...]
A year ago, Fastcase preemptively filed
the declaratory judgment lawsuit against Casemaker in federal court in Atlanta -LSB-...]
A week ago, I reported here that that a federal judge in Georgia had dismissed without prejudice Fastcase's
declaratory judgment lawsuit against Casemaker over the latter's claims of copyright in Georgia state regulations.
A year ago, Fastcase preemptively filed
the declaratory judgment lawsuit against Casemaker in federal court in Atlanta after Casemaker served it a written notice demanding it take down from its research collection the Georgia Administrative Rules and Regulations.
Not exact matches
...» Lamebook went on the offensive, filing a preemptive
lawsuit in federal court in Austin, Texas that sought a
declaratory judgment «of non-infringement and non-dilution [of Facebook's trademarks] and a declaration that the First Amendment protects the Lamebook mark.»
This week, the recipient of such a threat made a pre-emptive strike, filing a
lawsuit in a federal court in California seeking a
declaratory judgment that the First Amendment applies even to the almighty iPhone.
Filed a
declaratory judgment action that forced a proposed plaintiff, a chronic
lawsuit filer, to back off when our client received a letter threatening a baseless patent infringement action.
The
lawsuit seeks a
declaratory judgment holding that five
lawsuits pending in state courts around the country fall under the liquor liability exception to coverage.
The present
lawsuit, Netherlands Insurance v. Phusion Projects, involves a request by New Hampshire - based Netherlands Insurance Company and Indiana Insurance Company for a
declaratory judgment regarding their obligations under commercial liability policies issued to Phusion.
In 2007, the Website Operator brought a
lawsuit against REAL seeking a
declaratory judgment that the Website Operator did not infringe REAL's patents.
In 2007, Move brought a
lawsuit against REAL seeking a
declaratory judgment that the websites Move operates do not infringe REAL's patents.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company («Company») filed a separate action seeking a
declaratory judgment that it had no duty provide insurance coverage to the Brokerage in the Buyers»
lawsuit.