Whatever Peirce meant by
declaring individual identity to consist in a continuity of reactions, he did not mean that it consists in a collection of independent reactions.
Not exact matches
If one considers, however briefly, what conditions will make possible the flowering in the human heart of this new universal love, so often vainly dreamed of but now at last leaving the realm of the utopian and
declaring itself as both possible and necessary, one notices this: that if men on earth, all over the earth, are ever to love one another it is not enough for them to recognize in one another the elements of a single something; they must also, by developing a «planetary» consciousness, become aware of the fact that without loss of their
individual identities they are becoming a single somebody.
Even if we could agree on the
identity of those
individuals who have attempted to consider the plethora of theodicies in a careful, objective manner, and even if we could determine objectively exactly which specific self - consistent, comprehensive theodicies the majority in this group consider convincing, we would not thereby be in a position to
declare which theodicies could justifiably be considered plausible in the objective sense Griffin envisions.
After
declaring that «everything whose
identity consists in a continuity of reactions will be a single logical
individual,» Peirce explained: «Thus any portion of space, so far as it can be regarded as reacting, is for logic a single
individual; its spatial extension is no objection» (3.613).
The Name and Gender Marker Change Project aims to help transgender
individuals reach an essential step in claiming their
identity — to ensure their official documents match their
declared identities.