Climate sceptics point to increased sightings by indigenous Canadian communities, though that could be due to
declines in sea ice driving the animals ashore.
Not exact matches
But Mr. Kempthorne stressed that the decision was made under some duress, that oil and gas operations were not harmful to the bears and that the Endangered Species Act listing would not affect policy on greenhouse gases (even though the model shows that a continuing
decline in the bears»
sea -
ice habitat were all
driven by rising greenhouse gases).
There is ample evidence that the recent
decline in Arctic
Sea Ice is primarily
driven by Wind and Atmospheric Oscillations, i.e.: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/06/16/the-economist-provides-readers-with-erroneous-information-about-arctic-
sea-
ice/
There is no explicit physical reasoning — the implicit assumption is that whatever factors
drove the
sea ice extent to
decline approximately linearly during 10 Septembers between 1997 — 2006, will continue to operate
in September 2008.
«The
driving force
in the concern over polar bears, she said, is the
decline in sea ice.