Moreover the recent
decline of the yearly increments d (CO2) / dt acknowledged by Francey et al (2013)(
figure 17 - F) and even by James Hansen who say that the Chinese coal emissions have been immensely beneficial to the plants that are now bigger grow faster and eat more CO2 due to the fertilisation of the air (references in note 19) cast some doubts on those compartment models with many adjustable parameters, models proved to be blatantly wrong by observations as said very politely by Wang et al.: (Xuhui Wang et al: A two-fold increase of carbon
cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations, Nature, 2014) «Thus, the problems present models have in reproducing the observed response of the carbon
cycle to climate variability on interannual timescales may call into question their ability to predict the future evolution of the carbon
cycle and its feedbacks to climate»
I can only see the death coming when the CO2 ppmv
figure actually trends down following the recent temp
declines in the Pacific al nina large events that have caused the climate events not seen in a century (that is multi-decadal
CYCLES).