Sentences with phrase «decrease in temperature if»

KRISTEN STRATTON: And also just being on the mom's chest will increase in temperature if baby is cold or decrease in temperature if baby is hot regulates breathing, blood sugar, it's just pretty amazing.

Not exact matches

You can jump right in to a cold shower if you like, but if you're like most people, it's probably going to be more tolerable and enjoyable to get in and then decrease the water temperature.

If water did not decrease in density as the temperature approached freezing, the water in ponds and rivers would freeze from the bottom up instead of from the top down and lots of fish and other forms of life would perish in the winter.

If you add too many of those Greek lamb meatballs in the pan, the temperature of the oil will decrease.

If your body is dehydrated, it can result in an increase in body temperature, increased risk for heatstroke and heat exhaustion, and decreased strength, speed and stamina — none of which an athlete wants to experience.

If your body is dehydrated, this can result in an increase in body temperature, increased risk for heat stroke and heat exhaustion, and decreased strength, speed and stamina «'' none of which an athlete wants to experience.

If milk has been kept at room temperature or in a cooler with icepacks prior to being placed in the refrigerator, safe storage time may be decreased.

If the milk has been stored at room temperature, in a cooler with icepacks, or in the refrigerator prior to being placed in the freezer, safe freezing time may be decreased.

If the milk has been kept at room temperature prior to being placed into the cooler, safe storage time in the cooler may be decreased somewhat.

Infested items should be placed in the freezer at -17.8 ° C (0 ° F) for a minimum of 3.5 [days], though time may be decreased to 48 [hours] if temperatures average below -20 ° C.

If the body temperature drops, such as when an animal goes into hibernation, TBG's affinity for thyroxine increases, resulting in a decrease in the availability of the hormone and a decrease in metabolism.

These Equations, IF CORRECT, will predict the commencement of glaciation in Antarctica, and the progressive increase in Glaciation as Surface Pressures decrease, and Surface Temperatures decrease with elapsed time in million year increments.

But as the seasons change, with the shift in temperature to cooler days and cold nights, everyone's body experiences a phase of down - regulation of metabolism which if you're already on toxic overload and decreased immunity can make you susceptible to catching what's going around.

If you have a change of 5 - 10 degrees in temperature it may cause the tire pressure to decrease to a level that is unsafe and cause your low tire light to come on.

[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising temperatures globally; the second GHG, water vapor, exists in equilibrium with water / ice, would precipitate out if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback; since the oceans cover so much of the planet, water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger polar warming than the global average; decreasing the temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking highs, increasing drought and extreme temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)

He comments that «if temperature changes are purely random and unpredictable, the chance of a cooling decade would be 50 %, since an increase and a decrease in temperatures are equally likely».

Thus, even if it is rigorously demonstrated that for a given glacier a causal connection between the «global average» temperature and the decrease in the mass of a glacier exists, extrapolation to other glaciers is not recommended.

If one postulates that the global average surface temperature tracks the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, possibly with some delay, then when the CO2 concentration continues to rise monotonically but the global average surface temperature shows fluctuations as a function of time with changes in slope (periods wherein it decreases), then you must throw the postulate away.

If the optical thickness and temperature distributions are such that the dominant spatial tendency in temperature is to either increase or decrease (as opposed to fluctuate) from a location out to a substantial optical thickness away, then farther increases in optical thickness will bring the flux and intensities coming from that direction toward the values they would have for a blackbody with a temperature equal to the temperature at that location.

Then, if the atmosphere were to consist of opaque isothermal layers, each layer of the atmosphere (as in the above example) would be colder by 0.84 than the layer below, thus establishing a decreasing temperature trend with height.

Re Todd at # 1 and CM at # 5: Am I right in understanding that the key point is that it's quite possible for global surface temperatures to decrease even as the globe warms if more than the excess inflow of heat goes into the deep oceans?

If it is in an isothermal layer, it will radiate upward as much as downward; it will decrease the baseline TRPP net flux and increase the baseline TOA flux by the same amount, but it will decrease the baseline TOA flux by a greater amount if it is absorbing radiation with a higher brightness temperature from below (the baseline upward flux at TRPP), so it will increase the amount by which the baseline net flux at TRPP is greater than that at TOIf it is in an isothermal layer, it will radiate upward as much as downward; it will decrease the baseline TRPP net flux and increase the baseline TOA flux by the same amount, but it will decrease the baseline TOA flux by a greater amount if it is absorbing radiation with a higher brightness temperature from below (the baseline upward flux at TRPP), so it will increase the amount by which the baseline net flux at TRPP is greater than that at TOif it is absorbing radiation with a higher brightness temperature from below (the baseline upward flux at TRPP), so it will increase the amount by which the baseline net flux at TRPP is greater than that at TOA.

Re 9 wili — I know of a paper suggesting, as I recall, that enhanced «backradiation» (downward radiation reaching the surface emitted by the air / clouds) contributed more to Arctic amplification specifically in the cold part of the year (just to be clear, backradiation should generally increase with any warming (aside from greenhouse feedbacks) and more so with a warming due to an increase in the greenhouse effect (including feedbacks like water vapor and, if positive, clouds, though regional changes in water vapor and clouds can go against the global trend); otherwise it was always my understanding that the albedo feedback was key (while sea ice decreases so far have been more a summer phenomenon (when it would be warmer to begin with), the heat capacity of the sea prevents much temperature response, but there is a greater build up of heat from the albedo feedback, and this is released in the cold part of the year when ice forms later or would have formed or would have been thicker; the seasonal effect of reduced winter snow cover decreasing at those latitudes which still recieve sunlight in the winter would not be so delayed).

Even if clouds were decreasing there would be the clear sky super greenhouse effect where the rate at which downwelling thermal radiation grows relative to increasing temperatures is actually higher in the tropics than the rate at which surface thermal radiation emissions increase.

If the 20 ppmv / K holds, then the subsequent decrease of CO2 levels with ~ 40 ppmv would have induced a ~ 2 K temperature drop, which is not visible in the temperature proxy of the ice core.

With the decrease in Atlantic trade wind strength there is less evaporation, and if there is less evaporation, sea surface temperatures rise.

If this temperature in increased or decreased just a little, females will be produced.

The article points out that according to research conducted by a variety of institutions, the temperature goals set forth in the Paris Agreement will be unattainable if overall emissions are not decreased.

Your 30 °C could be relevant if most of the global ocean was at 30 °C but it isn't, and in the ex-tropics cloud cover decreases as temperature rises during summer.

The mass balance and d13C balance shows that vegetation as sink is not large enough to absorb all human CO2 if the oceans are a source and ice cores show that CO2 and temperature go to a (surprisingly linear) new equilibrium for every change in temperature level, not a sustained increase or decrease.

If you are a car owner and have a thermometer in your car, you may have noticed this, i.e., the temperature generally rises when you drive into an urban area and decreases when you leave an urban area.

She continues by emphasizing the too - little appreciated fact that — in the words of climate scientist Susan Solomon — «atmospheric temperatures... are not expected to decrease significantly even if the carbon emissions cease» and that warming is essentially irreversible over a «time scale exceeding the end of the millennium in year 3000.»

In 1988, Hansen made three predictions, all three had temperatures going up, if that was done by chance there would be a 87.5 % chance that at least one of the predictions would be for temperatures to decrease, temperatures increased, therefore Hansen did better than chance, at least to 87.5 %.

If decreasing global temperature increases ice cover, that will tend to increase the moment of inertia, accounting for some of the slowdown in rotation.

«Warming, if it resumes again after the 18 - 26 year «pause» in global surface temperatures, tending to decrease the temperature differences or gradients between the equator and the poles...»

The study also contains a cautionary note: if effective heat capacity should prove to be less than estimated in the study, or the carbon dioxide degassing timescale proved longer, it could result in temperature overshoots in which initial temperature decreases are reversed when carbon dioxide re-accumulates in the atmosphere.

David A. «If oceanic storms are created by the equatorial - polar temperature gradient, wouldn't one expect a decrease in storminess?»

If oceanic storms are created by the equatorial - polar temperature gradient, wouldn't one expect a decrease in storminess?

Even in areas where precipitation does not decrease, these increases in surface evaporation and loss of water from plants lead to more rapid drying of soils if the effects of higher temperatures are not offset by other changes (such as reduced wind speed or increased humidity).5 As soil dries out, a larger proportion of the incoming heat from the sun goes into heating the soil and adjacent air rather than evaporating its moisture, resulting in hotter summers under drier climatic conditions.6

«If a substantial number of lowland tropical species are already living near their upper temperature limit, as evolutionary principles, climate history and recent studies suggest,» he added, «then lowland biotas may undergo attrition, as some species shift upwards in elevation, and others suffer decreased fitness in the lowlands.»

But what if decreases in atmospheric CO2 levels have no significant effect on global temperatures?

If temperature does increase or decrease then energy re-radiation into space also increases or decreases in direct proportion BUT it also increases and decreases in proportion to the TOTAL available energy.

The important point of # 35 is if more temperatures are being taken, and historically on the east coast of the US, the ships spent more time in the intercoastal if possible and took paths where the Gulf Stream was warmer, and may have used the Gulf stream for the added effeicency (I remember reading that but could not find it) then perhaps the only part of the data that need to be changed is a.3 C decrease for 1941 to 1945.

If this is true then would not the Trade Winds decrease in intensity if the temperature differential between the tropic and higher latitudes decreasIf this is true then would not the Trade Winds decrease in intensity if the temperature differential between the tropic and higher latitudes decreasif the temperature differential between the tropic and higher latitudes decrease?

Mazarella tells us that if we look at climate change as a part of a holistic process, we see that included in this single unit are changes in «atmospheric circulation» and «like a torque,» variations in atmospheric circulation can in and of themselves cause «the Earth's rotation to decelerate which in turn causes a decrease in sea temperature.»

Well, except that in 5 to 10 more years, the current embarrassment of non-increasing global temperatures may have become the terminal disease of actually decreasing global temperatures as we continue to ride the solar cycle down, and all of the people who are currently «embattled» but still viewed as being noble martyrs for a cause will be treated professionally as if they have a mix of Ebola and Leprosy, especially those that bent ethical rules in order to promote something untrue.

Just as any sort - term drop in temperatures becomes a claim that global warming has «stopped», any study that mentions a decrease in climate sensitivity is grabbed as if it is evidence that everything about climate sensitivity is decreasing.

If you look at the average global response to large volcanic eruptions, from Krakatoa to Pinatubo, you would see that the global temperature decreased by only about 0.1 °C while the hypersensitive climate models give 0.3 to 0.5 °C, not seen in reality.

«If more reflective crop species can be developed... this could decrease local and regional temperatures, in particular, during heatwaves.

The basic point and the one relevant to climate change, is still relevant — oceans still have an enormous moderating effect on temperature over time (though if there is a huge increase or decrease in re radiated atmospheric heat it is going to then affect the oceans initially).