The DDPP analysis shows that achieving
deep decarbonization by 2050 is possible without carbon removal, but it doesn't argue against developing carbon removal solutions in parallel.
Looking forward, the new administration and new Congress will need to consider how best to incentivize continued research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) and commercial - scale deployment of CO2 utilization technology, especially as the U.S. begins to lay the foundation for a strategy of
deep decarbonization by mid-century.
Not exact matches
After 30 years of learning (and unlearning) about climate change science and policy, as many know, I've tended to give extra weight to the argument for greatly intensified research pressed
by Gates, and before him Richard Smalley, John Holdren, Martin Hoffert and Ken Caldeira, the
Deep Decarbonization team, the Breakthrough Institute and many others.
The UN report itself is quite clear on the imperative for
decarbonization, stating «
Deep and immediate carbon dioxide reductions are required to protect long - term climate, as this can not be achieved
by addressing short - lived climate forcers.»
Both have been included in the recent
Deep Decarbonization Pathways analysis undertaken
by one of the sponsors of today's meeting, the U.N. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
We need to start thinking in practical terms about how to get the technologies we need ready — as the authors say, «
deep energy system
decarbonization is likely to require an ambitious, focused agenda of rapid innovation and improvement in every critical technology area, even those commercially available today, as well as substantial «demand pull» efforts and policies to ensure early demonstration, industry maturation, scale - up, and «learning
by doing.
A critically important document was released
by the White House recently, laying out a strategy for
deep decarbonization of the USA.
While current policy measures set
by governments are a step forward to addressing aviation's runaway emissions, they are woefully insufficient to achieve necessary levels of
deep decarbonization within the sector.
Deep decarbonization is the first step to achieving «zero emissions by 2070 (full decarbonization),» according to Jeffrey Sachs et al. in their essay, «From Good Intentions to Deep Decarbon
decarbonization is the first step to achieving «zero emissions
by 2070 (full
decarbonization),» according to Jeffrey Sachs et al. in their essay, «From Good Intentions to Deep Decarbon
decarbonization),» according to Jeffrey Sachs et al. in their essay, «From Good Intentions to
Deep DecarbonizationDecarbonization.»
To be truly «comprehensive,» a
deep -
decarbonization plan must recognize the dire threat that economic stratification poses to our ability to mobilize, and reveal the mechanisms
by which we will learn, again, to cooperate.
«Unless we get extremely lucky and see the cost of new modular nuclear reactors or NET Power's CCS gas plant somehow become cost competitive overnight, the current trajectories for wind and solar are
by no means sufficient to carry us to the kind of
deep decarbonization that we need,» Jenkins said.
(1) No False Choices: To Preserve a Livable Climate, We Need to Slash Both CO2 and Methane ASAP; (2) Oil Change International Report: Fossil Fuel Production Subsidies Exceed $ 21 Billion Annually in United States, have increased
by 45 % under Obama's «All of the Above» energy policy; (3) Joint Economic Committee Hearing on «The Economic Impact of Increased Natural Gas Production» (video); (4) Leaked Trade Deal Document Shows EU Pressuring U.S. to Lift Crude Oil Export Ban; (5)
Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP) Presents Interim Report to UN Secretary - General Ban Ki - Moon.
This is the exact question begged
by the findings of the
Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP), a collaboration among climate and energy experts from 16 countries representing around 75 % of global greenhouse gas emissions.
The simplest way to describe the
deep decarbonization of energy systems is
by the principal drivers of energy - related CO2 emissions — for convenience, since the focus of this chapter is on energy systems, we simply refer to them as CO2 emissions.
Deep decarbonization would require the banning of the consumption of all meat (agriculture currently is directly or indirectly (due to cutting down forests to grow food to feed to animals which are then eaten and the CH4 emitted
by the animals, and so on for 18 % of the CO2 emissions.)
To be truly «comprehensive,» a
deep -
decarbonization plan must recognize the dire threat which economic stratification poses to our ability to mobilize, and reveal the mechanisms
by which we will learn, again, to cooperate.