«Achieving this goal will require
deep global emissions reductions, with most countries including Australia eventually reducing net greenhouse gas emissions to zero or below.»
Not exact matches
Achieving the 2025 target will require a further
emission reduction of 9 - 11 % beyond our 2020 target compared to the 2005 baseline and a substantial acceleration of the 2005 - 2020 annual pace of
reduction, to 2.3 - 2.8 percent per year, or an approximate doubling;» Substantial
global emission reductions are needed to keep the
global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius, and the 2025 target is consistent with a path to
deep decarbonization.
(a) To hold the increase in the
global average temperature [below 1.5 °C][or][well below 2 °C] above pre-industrial levels by ensuring
deep reductions in
global greenhouse gas [net]
emissions;...
To limit the long - term risks of sea level rise and the costs of adapting to it, we must work toward
deep reductions in the
global warming
emissions that are the primary cause of rising sea levels.
Deep cuts in carbon dioxide
emissions are urgently needed to prevent dangerous climate change, but they must be complemented by
reductions in short - lived climate pollutants, which produce a strong
global...
We will need to see a
deep decline if we are to limit dangerous climate change, and even with existing
emissions -
reduction commitments,
global emissions are not expected to decline until at least after 2030.
However, in order to stay within the 1.5 - degree Celsius increase in
global temperatures required to maintain a viable planet for human beings, we must achieve
deep reductions in transportation
emissions, which presents significant political, technical, and behavioral difficulties.
Deep cuts in carbon dioxide
emissions are urgently needed to prevent dangerous climate change, but they must be complemented by
reductions in short - lived climate pollutants, which produce a strong
global warming effect but have relatively brief atmospheric lifetimes.
Deep US involvement in efforts to develop a
global emissions reduction treaty is deemed essential, given the country is the world's second largest source of greenhouse gases after China.
(Bernie Fraser, Chairman, Climate Change Authority): «The funding of the kind of scale that would be necessary to deal with the extra
emissions reductions that Australia will have to pursue to do its bit to reduce
global emissions makes it quite fanciful I think to think that the ERF could be scaled up and funded to the degree that one would think would be necessary»... (John Connor, CEO Climate Institute): «The debate is shifting into even
deeper reductions that we need to have beyond 2020 and it shows that the
emissions reduction fund is just an inadequate tool to be the primary tool for
emission reductions, while the renewable energy target is a critical target that we need to be strengthening, not weakening.
The single line in the proposal Harper apparently found inadmissible was: «We call for a long - term
global goal as well as binding commitments to
deep, absolute
emission reductions by developed countries.»
Global Climate Change On the Climate Bill Green Groups Mustn't Surrender When the Battle is Just Starting India Won't Commit to Binding
Emissions Reductions - Which is Why Rich Countries Must Make
Deeper Cuts Focus on Green Economic Development in Developing Countries, Not Just Emission
Reductions: Chair of IPCC
What we did say was that carbon regulations and pricing, while sufficient to achieve modest
reductions in
global carbon
emissions, would not be sufficient to achieve the
deep reductions that climate scientists and environmental organizations, including your own, have called for.