Last Saturday, at a workshop organized by the Foundation Questions Institute, Nobel laureate physicist Gerard» t Hooft gave a few informal remarks on
the deep nature of reality.
Not exact matches
In sharp contrast to some religious proponents
of «
deep ecology» who betray a monistic passion to subsume all
of reality into a conceptual tapioca pudding
of undifferentiated Oneness, we know that neither we nor
nature is God.
Here he contends that just as Chuang - tzu tried to perceive the
nature of reality from the perspective
of fish or butterfly, so, too, should Christians seek to transcend the boundaries
of history, religion and culture to develop
deeper contacts with the mysterious ways in which God operates.
Both the predella and the triptych give visual expression to Luther's
deep conviction that God, who is hidden and invisible, accommodates God's self to our finite and fallen
nature by revealing God's disposition toward us through material things: in the incarnation, in the sacrament and in the Good News
of scripture received, above all, through hearing (a material
reality, but not visual, to be sure).
The discussion
of the
nature and relevance
of the Christian faith therefore always plays some part in bringing us into encounter with that
deepest reality in life we call God.
Einstein always held that the statistical
nature of Bohr et al.'s «Copenhagen interpretation» was an insufficient answer, and there must be a
deeper and deterministic explanation
of reality which will explain the behaviour
of individual particles, and not just the stochastic ensemble.
Few will deny, for example, that Paul's theology represents with something approaching adequacy the fact and meaning
of sin in human life — the
reality of moral evil, the universal blight it brings, man's hopeless entanglement with it, the perverse and rebellious pride,
deep in our
nature, which degrades us, distorts our efforts, mars even our best moral achievements, and from which we know God must save us if we are to be saved at all.
Whitehead's empirical approach, like that
of William James and, to some extent, George Santayana, recognizes the superficial
nature of sense perception and posits a
deeper, but vaguer, contact with
reality.
Thanks to breakthroughs in physics, we may be gaining still
deeper insights into the very
nature of reality.
Like Einstein and Louis de Broglie before him, Bohm argued that quantum randomness is not intrinsic to
nature, but reflects our ignorance
of a
deeper level
of reality.
His paintings seek solitude, a place where human beings are forced to contend with the
deeper realities of nature.
Distorting
reality and its
nature, removing the aesthetic vision that we have
of any given individual, Baía guides us into looking
deeper.
Such development depends on seeking truth at the
deepest level, understanding the
nature of reality so as to be able to act in a way which is best for oneself and for others.