The thermohaline circulation of the global ocean is controlled in part by freshwater inputs to northern seas that regulate the strength of North
Atlantic Deep Water formation by reducing surface seawater density.
The GSA seems to have originated from a large discharge of ice from the Arctic to the key
deep water formation regions of the North Atlantic.
A good way to estimate the effect of the thermohaline part of the heat transport is to shut it down by dumping a lot of freshwater into the north Atlantic in a climate model, which
stops deep water formation there.
Enormous amounts of freshwater were released into the North Atlantic following deglaciation, and an influx of freshwater into the North Atlantic
Deep Water formation zone can potentially trigger abrupt climate changes.
In addition to the main threshold for a complete breakdown of the circulation, other thresholds may exist that involve more - limited changes, such as a cessation or diminishment of Labrador
Sea deep water formation (Wood et al., 1999).
In a version of the model without Drake Passage the temperature distribution is symmetric about the equator, due in large part to the fact that the meridional overturning in the ocean is symmetric about the equator
with deep water formation in both hemispheres.
For global warming scenarios, additional forcing comes into play: surface warming and enhanced high - latitude precipitation, which will also reduce density of northern surface waters (an effect which alone has shut down
deep water formation in some model experiments, e.g. Manabe and Stouffer 1993, 1994).
«The North Atlantic zone of
deep water formation,» said Kullenberg, «is a very considerable carbon sink.»
Modelling uncertainty currently is such that in some climate models, this amount of freshwater (without any other forcing) would shut down
deep water formation, in some it wouldn't.
[Response: You're talking of cold events that are a response to massive freshwater influx to the Atlantic and a subsequent shut - down of
deep water formation.
This suggests that the associated changes in North Atlantic
Deep Water formation and in the large - scale deposition of wind - borne iron in the Southern Ocean had limited impact on CO2.
At mid-depth (500 to 2,000 m), the Atlantic and southern end of the Pacific section show widespread change, but the North Pacific signal is weaker and shallower because it has only weak intermediate water formation (and
no deep water formation).
Changes in Arctic Sea Ice suggest that there have been changes in
deep water formation.
Ferreira, D., P. Cessi, H. K. Coxall, A. de Boer, H. A. Dijkstra, S. S. Drijfhout, T. Eldevik, N. Harnik, J. F. McManus, D. P. Marshall, J. Nilsson, F. Roquet, T. Schneider, R. C. Wills, 2018: Atlantic - Pacific asymmetry in
deep water formation.
A shutoff in North Atlantic
Deep Water formation and the associated Atlantic THC can occur if sufficient freshwater (and / or heat) enters the North Atlantic to halt density - driven North Atlantic Deep Water formation (41).
Martinson, D. G. in Deep Convection and
Deep Water Formation in the Oceans (eds Chu, P. C. & Gascard, J. C.) 37 — 52 (Elsevier Oceanography Series, 1991).
, 1985: North Atlantic
Deep Water Formation.
Deep water formation and circulation in the Arctic Ocean.