Sentences with phrase «deeply flawed process»

BY ANDY HUMM Justice Doris Ling - Cohan, a distinguished 20 - year veteran of the State Supreme Court bench and a hero to the LGBT community for her historic 2005 ruling in favor of same - sex marriage, was put through the ringer in recent weeks by a deeply flawed process of the New York County Democratic Party for nominating -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

He said at a Monday press conference that it was an attempt to «politicize the intelligence process» in service of a «deeply flawed person in the Oval Office.»

If the actual life of a community whose whole reason for being is to witness to the coming of God's Kingdom is itself deeply flawed with unjust practices (lack of due process, sexism, authoritarianism), then it can hardly witness effectively to history's own hope.

Now for the process of achieving these reforms, which was deeply flawed.

Notably, in 2010, the ACLU testified against «the use of terror watch lists to screen gun purchases,» writing that the «deeply flawed» terror watch list process led the group to conclude, «Given these problems, we do not believe that anyone should be deprived of the right to purchase a gun, or the right to fly, or any other benefit of membership in civil society based solely on placement on a terror watch list.»

«The mayor is deeply concerned about the result of what was clearly a flawed process,» Anthony Shorris, First Deputy Mayor, told the Journal.

The letter describes the loss of the site's former nursing home as «a devastating blow to our constituents» and says the two pols «remain deeply concerned about a flawed city process that has paved the way for the closure, sale, and now potential conversion of this building into luxury condos.»

Therefore, the 2011 budget process was deeply flawed and the modified budget of the Board of Legislators did not have the necessary vetting and due diligence.

Instead, this deeply flawed and fascinating individual inexorably follows the internal logic of his negative thought process to its logical conclusion.

But this both overestimates the barriers to traditional publication — the vetting and selection process may be deeply flawed, but every writer can submit a manuscript — and underestimates the constraints of the marketplace.

1) Rebalancing according to a pre-defined policy removes any guesswork from the decision - making process, minimizing the impact of our (deeply flawed) behavioral biases;

In addition, the process of resolving credit reporting errors is deeply flawed, with the credit reporting agencies using an automated dispute resolution process that consumers describe as «Kafkaesque.»

«The WHO's process lacks transparency, is deeply flawed, and lacks objective scientific support.

However, it is not foolproof — a deeply flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper on paleoclimate submitted to a social science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.

The hockey stick story reveals that the IPCC allowed a deeply flawed study to dominate the Third Assessment Report, which suggests the possibility of bias in the Report - writing process.

In short, this is a deeply flawed study and if it were to be published as anything resembling the draft I have examined, that would certainly raise troubling questions about the peer review process at the Annals of Applied Statistics.

And what you characterize as «coercing journals» may just as well -LSB-(or better) be seen as protesting a deeply flawed editorial process.

Regarding curatorial and editorial contributions, any number of innovative structures might provide great improvements over the deeply flawed and inconsistent process of peer review and its associated processes that we currently rely on publishers to facilitate.

«The WHO's process lacks transparency, is deeply flawed, and lacks objective scientific support.