It's about what happens when the world encounters
a deeply moral person, and how it reacts in kind.
Not exact matches
There is indeed something
deeply wrong with a
person who lacks principles, who has no
moral core.
But the fact that the land was originally acquired by force was erased from the minds of the biblical writers because of the
deeply moral and spiritual heritage which the
people of Israel developed there.
Nonetheless, the Justices gravely declared that «the character of a nation of
people who aspire to live according to the rule of law» is ultimately to be measured by the
people's willingness to put aside their
deeply held
moral and religious views and accept the Court's pronouncements on this and other divisive questions.
Most of the worlds
people believe that God is the source of
moral behaviour and they are
deeply suspicious of non-believers, for they have no
moral compass.
Philosophically landing in a place where
moral integrity and passion can exact enormous cruelty on a
person's life, Potter's picture is clearly a very personal one, but its depiction of global and social destruction (or its potential) is still
deeply humanistic and universal.
How do we guide students to think more
deeply about the
moral considerations
people made in their choice to support the institution of slavery?
For me, that is the only point of «organized» religion... I would never say
people without an organized religion can't be
deeply spiritual and / or
moral people.