Representing a leading sporting organisation on a potential claim against an individual who was sending abusive and
defamatory emails to senior staff and posting defamatory content on Facebook.
The internet defamation campaign included social media postings impersonating Rutman using fake email addresses and sending
defamatory emails about Rutman from anonymous addresses to his friends, family and business associates.
She was found liable for sending
defamatory emails to their other neighbors and to the staff of their children's elementary school, claiming the couple were swingers and enjoyed «nude hot tub parties.»
Since their two kids are adopted, the couple is concerned
the defamatory emails might hurt future adoption efforts.
Steve: Mann sent
the defamatory email to highly influential people with the intent of damaging McKitrick and me within the climate community.
At this point I'm wondering if taking an anonymous
defamatory email and passing it on anonymously still counts as slander on the part of the passer - on.
In a private security contractor's defamation suit against the U.S. involving an allegedly
defamatory email, the Norfolk U.S. District Court dismisses the suit because the plaintiff contractor failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Not exact matches
In the
email, a copy of which is posted on the publication's website, Mr. Harder listed several statements he claimed were
defamatory and demanded that the publication «immediately and permanently remove each of these statements from the story, and print a full and complete retraction and apology, with as prominent placement as the original story.»
In an
email, the lawyer, Charles J. Harder, said Ms. Trump, the wife of Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, «has placed several news organizations on notice of her legal claims against them, including Daily Mail among others, for making false and
defamatory statements about her supposedly having been an «escort» in the 1990s.»
Any illegal,
defamatory, or libelous material contained in or on this site, including Web pages, resumes,
emails, profiles, opinions, comments, attachments, discussion board postings or chat materials.
Stacy Stewart, whose law firm Cantor Colburn is representing Parker, called Paul's allegations «false and
defamatory» in an
email to The Dodo.
You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services, the Sites or any Materials therein to take any actions that: (i) infringe on PetSmart Charities» or any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual or proprietary rights, or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are
defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, constitute discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sex, disability or other protected grounds, or are pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on PetSmart Charities or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices, or any unsolicited bulk
email or unsolicited commercial
email or otherwise in a manner that violate any applicable «anti-spam» legislation, including that commonly referred to as «CASL»; (vii) would be or encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national or international laws or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interference with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of PetSmart Charities» or another party's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other account users or attempt to gain access to other account users» accounts or otherwise mine information about other account users or the Sites, or interfere with any other user's ability to access or use the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) in PetSmart Charities» sole discretion, are contrary to PetSmart Charities» public image, goodwill, reputation or mission, or otherwise not in furtherance of our Vision of a lifelong, loving home for every pet.
You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are
defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk
email or unsolicited commercial
email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.
Upload, post,
email or submit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous,
defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libellous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, embarrassing to another person or entity or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
Mark, you mentioned Mann's
defamatory accusation in the CG
emails that our academic articles were «scientific fraud».
The Supreme Court of British Columbia has recently held, however, that offering a link to an
email program (e.g. «mailto:») on a web page that contains
defamatory material constitutes republication of that material, apparently whether or not anyone used it.
I see there is a recent 304 paragraph decision in B.C. — Newman et al v. Halstead et al, 2006 BCSC 65 — in which the court awarded damages totalling $ 681,000 against an individual defendant (who did not appear at the trial, hence there was no defence per se) for her liability in making
defamatory statements on her website, chat rooms and
email about various teachers in which she made allegations of misconduct and allegations that the School Board mishandled or covered up this activity.
Senator Enverga filed the contempt motion after Cusipag continued to publish and
email defamatory statements in violation of a permanent injunction that prohibited her from publishing such statements.
Cusipag sent a number of
emails containing
defamatory statements to several people, including the Speaker of the Senate, Hon. George Furey, and Ontario Senators Salma Ataullahjan and Thanh Hai Ngo.
She had accused Richard Roberts of making
defamatory remarks when he claimed she inappropriately took an
email list from the organization when she was fired last January.
X sent an
email to about 20 people with a statement about me that was false, (and arguably
defamatory).
The
email made reference to two expert reports provided by the plaintiff in terms he claims were
defamatory.
a) uploading, posting,
emailing, transmitting, or otherwise making available any content that shall be deemed unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious,
defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, or invasive of another's privacy or which is hateful, and / or racially, ethnically, or otherwise objectionable;