Sentences with phrase «defect in jury trial»

Represented an exotic car manufacturer in obtaining a defense verdict of no liability and no defect in jury trial involving product liability, breach of warranty, consumer statute, and fraud claims.

Not exact matches

However, the Court found that the defects in the question to the jury did not necessitate a new trial, and that the trial judge was correct not to poll the jury in the circumstances, despite having the jurisdiction to do so.
He has tried more than 50 jury trials to verdict including cases in the area of Title VII, ADEA, Section 1983, police practices and procedure, commercial and residential construction defect cases, first party property, first party automobile, premises liability, products liability, trucking and automobile bodily injury lawsuits.
The $ 11 million ruling awarded by a jury in a Topamax birth defect case will stand, according to National Trial Lawyers.
Successful defense of contractor at trial involving allegations of construction defects resulting in jury verdict of $ 1.00.
Served as second - chair trial counsel and secured defense verdict following seven - week jury trial in the California Superior Court for the County of Orange of action for strict and negligent products liability and negligence based on allegations of design defects, manufacturing defects, and warning defects.
Obtained a preliminary injunction, and after a 3-1/2 month jury trial, obtained a multi-million dollar award in favor of client, including an order requiring defecting employees to repay portions of wages and bonuses received while engaging in unfair competition.
The trial court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment on her failure to warn claim, and a jury entered a verdict in Merck's favor in October 2011 on the design defect claim.
The Plaintiff argued that there was no need to discharge the jury and proper instructions «could cure any defects in the trial ``.
Defended same client against product defect action, winning not guilty verdict in highly publicized jury trial.
The trial court overruled a jury verdict in favor of the Buyers and entered judgment in favor of the Seller and Broker, due to the Buyers» failure to present expert testimony on the property's diminution in value due to the defects.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z