Sentences with phrase «defence work because»

Not exact matches

I'm really undecided about Cazorla because he sometimes plays so well buthe isn't consistent at all, he doesn't provide width or pace or work very hard in defence so he shouldn't be guaranteed a starting spot.

Koscielny told Arsenal Player, «It is not just the work of the back four because our quality is to have the ball, to stay high and when we lose the ball to transition from offence to defence.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

This is simple a very intelligent child can solve this problem.Firstly today our keeper was very poor however i know he will come good.By the way why is Paulista no getting his chance.What i have observed about arsenal since we signed Mertesacker from day one and since he started playing is that Mertesacker hardly gets involved you will usually see him a few times because he does not want to get caught out.e has always been a weak link in the defence even in his greatest performances here.When i see us playing with a high line and he is there i always laugh.It is just a mistake waiting to happen and i can tell u that it will happen again this season.Secondly why is Ramsey Cazorla and Ozil playing in the same line - up in a 4 -5-1 formation.That is just not right though it will win you some matches due to individual brilliance.It wont work at all.Lastly the least i say about Giroud the better i am not judging him on one game.One would imagine if he was not french and like chinese will he be getting these chances under Wenger.To me he will always be an average player and i will stand by my word even if he has good games.

He was fighting the fight he and Rozier had planned for and it was working — Golovkin had to fall back to his jab, which was the most effective punch of the fight for him, but there were rounds Jacobs was in control of with his movement, defence and effective punching, which Golovkin came alive too late to take because he was getting outboxed or stymied for the longer portion, as painful as I'm sure that is for some people to even consider.

But the biggest culprit is Wenger and bold whom I don't know his work actually because from the way the thing is our defence is letting us down..

I think he had a poor season last term because premier league defences have worked out how to deal with him.

We have Debuchy, Sanchez, Ramsey, Wilshere, Campbell, Rosicky, Chamberlain, Walcott, Welbeck... All these players have pace and work rate, as well as technical skill, but we can't tell them to press high when they lose the ball or to bring chaos to the opponent's defence because not only do we lack cover in midfield and central defense, we also play them out of position.

Compact defending, allow poccession, win the ball and hit them with pace and accuracy was what worked because our defence has been strong this year, and our attack deadly.

I think it may well have done because not only did Flamini score two good goals, he also made some big tackles and worked tirelessly to stop the home team over running our defence.

Let's hope it does not take too long to complete the deal and get the 24 - year old working with his new teammates at London Colney, because the loss of Mertesacker and Gabriel has left Wenger on the bare bones of his squad and we will probably have to face the formidable test of Liverpool with the inexperienced Rob Holding and Calum Chambers at the heart of our defence.

It's clear that sterling is already a better player for England because his first touch, movement off ball and dribbling are superior... Best let the ox who is work in progress be given a starting chance... Whippets can be brought on in last 20 minutes when defences are tired... But should sell him in January as part of package to bring in reus or player of real quality

I personally feel 4.3.3 with an interchanging front 3 of Welbeck, Walcott, Sanchez would work better, because as seen time and time againt Villas defence cant cope when they when Pacey strikers run at there defence Saido Mane's 2 min hatrick can confirm that.

I would go with the Ox in the middle against Man City, not just because of his fitness and form, but because his pace, power and work rate could be just what we need to stop Man City's own midfielders getting at our defence.

Presumably this would be because our current methods of overcoming packed defences were more often than not working.

Michael Fallon told Good Morning Britain the Ministry of Defence was able to «invest in the future» because Philip Hammond - the new Foreign Secretary - had «spent nearly four years» working on the department's budget.

«Our party has always been a broad church, and despite my principled differences with Jeremy over many issues of defence, foreign policy and national security, I agreed to serve on his front bench because of the mandate he was given, his assurances that honesty and difference were welcomed, and due to the many areas we agreed wholeheartedly on such as fighting the vicious Tory trade union bill - which I was proud to lead our work on - cuts to tax credits and tackling climate change.

In my defence, I believe this is because writing is my real work, and I feel out of sorts when I'm not doing it.

I call it Project Zero — because its aims are a zero - carbon - energy system; the production of machines, products and services with zero marginal costs; and the reduction of necessary work time as close as possible to zero... If I am right, the logical focus for supporters of postcapitalism is to build alternatives within the system; to use governmental power in a radical and disruptive way; and to direct all actions towards the transition — not the defence of random elements of the old system.

Nevertheless, the s 58 defence failed here because the system suffered from the built - in flaw that reports of potentially serious defects would not be evaluated at all by someone with the requisite skill out of working hours unless they came from members of the emergency services.

Everyone has an incentive to sort out the dispute by consent because an actual trial of a petition involves a great deal of preparatory legal work including service of points of claim and points of defence.

The numbers underestimate the amount of defence work a particular doctor does because the work done for other insurance companies or directly through defence lawyers does not make its way into these figures.

The numbers underestimate the amount of defence work a particular law firm does because the numbers do not include work for other insurance companies.

However, on the facts here the defence of affirmation had been made out (at least in relation to most of the allegations) because during the defendant's absence the claimants had made it clear that they wanted him to return to work (at least for the full notice period).