Sentences with phrase «defendant company»

The proposed starting point for a first time defendant company found guilty would be five per cent of the company's average annual turnover during the three years prior to sentencing.

The three individual defendants formerly worked for the plaintiffs, either as employees or contractors, and subsequently set up the fourth defendant company to compete with the plaintiffs.

Editor's Note: The National Association of REALTORS ® participated in an Amici Curiae brief in support of defendant Companies in this appeal.

Action against Defendants, a pharmaceutical company, its former CEO, and its former Controller, in connection with alleged financial reporting, books and records, and internal accounting controls violations by Defendant company.

«And then having the resources on all sides — that's government investigators, plaintiffs, even defendant companies — to be able to analyze that data, understand it, and model it.»

Listed by target defendant company name, you will stay abreast of pleadings, litigation status, damages, and the names and contact information of every lawyer involved on either side of each case.

In pre — CMCHA 2007 cases defendant companies, who have decided to disclose details of their financial resources, have focussed on the company's profits rather than turnover.

Appeared in the Court of Appeal on behalf of a director of Defendant company who was found by the first instance judge to have participated in a conspiracy to defraud the Claimant insurance companies: QBE and Markel v Surety Guarantee and Higgs [2009] EWCA Civ 790.

Due to the fact that Allianz is one of the largest insurers in the world, numerous conflicts of interests ensued where the group acted as insurer of defendant companies.

But for now the worst it's doing is causing some analysts to discount the ways they value the defendant companies.

Although the parmesan cheese cases were recently dismissed, the defendant companies were involved in contentious litigation for more than a year before the trial - level court dismissed the action.

According to the FTC, the defendant companies enticed student loan borrowers with promises that they could get rid of all their debt and repair their credit.

Recently, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered in Wee Shuo Woon v HT SRL4 whether privilege still attached to confidential documents published online as a result of a cyberattack on the defendant company.

Accordingly, a case in which we featured, Procter & Gamble International Operations SA v Star Global Trading Ltd [2016] EWHC 734 (Ch), remains good law; the burden, of course, being on the Defendant company to show that the goods were bought with a proper provenance enabling sale within Europe.

Customers and future shareholders or investors may wish to disassociate themselves with the defendant company.

The proposal will put a defendant company's turnover to the fore and require it to provide comprehensive accounts covering the previous three year period.

Under the current proposal it would fall to the defendant company to provide evidence of low liquidity if it considered that a fine based on turnover to be too high.

It is recognised that it is unlikely that this power will be widely used as by the time the matter has reached the courts, the relevant enforcement authority may have taken action, in the form of Improvement and / or Prohibition Notices / Orders, and / or the defendant company may have addressed the failures themselves to ensure the future safety of their employees.

The defendant company will have the opportunity to make representations.

The court can order that remedial steps are taken by the defendant company to address the failures which lead to the incident.

In addition to a fine or even as a stand - alone order, the court can order a publicity order requiring the defendant company to advertise its conviction for corporate manslaughter, to include details of the offence, the level of fine and the terms of any remedial order made.

The deterrent effect of the publicity order is to put the defendant company at a disadvantage in comparison with law abiding competitors.

In its consultation paper, the Sentencing Advisory Panel (SAP) has suggested that the fine should be calculated on a percentage of the defendant company's annual turnover.

The principals of the defendant company were accused of stealing trade secrets of the plaintiff and of... [more]

After the suit was filed, Defendant Company required all employees to complete an employment application form for the first time which reveals, inter alia, whether an employee is a citizen.

The defendant company, MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC.

The defendant company ran a business arranging adventure experiences, including hot - air balloon flights offered to paying customers.

At trial, one of the plaintiff's witnesses testified that as a worker at the defendant company, the husband would have been exposed to dust from the product.

The claimant's husband had even at one time been a director of the defendant company.

The plaintiff had been purchasing water from the defendant company for sixteen years.

All claims were dismissed by the physician group and a judgment was awarded for the defendant company plus attorneys» fees.

The guidance also requires that the court considers whether the consequence of the fine will be to put the defendant company out of business, but expressly acknowledges that this may be an acceptable consequence.

The defendant company violated transportation regulations by failing to ask their employee about second jobs which would impede his performance.

The defendant company owned a business where they operated heavy equipment such as a payloader, which frequently crossed the snowmobile trail that went through the property.

The firm also acted for the plaintiff class in Joseph v. Quik Payday Inc., and Mortillaro v. Cash Money seeking compensation for the criminal rates of interest that the defendant companies were alleged to charge on their «payday loans».

According to the SEC, Defendant company failed to maintain internal controls over financial reporting related to controls on the company's gross - to - net reserve accounts and estimates and overstated net revenue and income from continuing operations before income taxes, both issues disclosed in Defendant company's restatement of... Continue Reading

Obtained dismissal of a class action alleging that a defendant company had violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Massachusetts Wage Act

Usually, these are awarded when the behavior of the defendant company had been so blatantly wrong that the jury feels that a punishment is warranted.

Excalibur had brought a claim against the defendant companies, Texas and Gulf for specific performance of a collaboration agreement purportedly granting Excalibur a 30 % share in the potentially lucrative Shaikan oil field in Kurdistan.

In phase two, the organization conducts outreach to consumers on the defendant company's customer list.

[T] he issue was job function but the class was carefully defined to ensure class - wide job function similarity; and... where the common issues were focused on the systemic nature of the defendant company's policies and practices rather than on class member entitlements.

The Defendant companies were the Plaintiff's consultant, agent or distributor in China.

In April 2009, the plaintiff (through his personal corporation) began working for the defendant company as its CFO.

A defendant company that licensed technical data and prototypes from plaintiff company in order to develop a grenade launcher has to return prototype launchers and parts to plaintiff under their agreement, but the Alexandria U.S. District Court says the fact...