Sentences with phrase «defendant doctor»
The phrase "defendant doctor" refers to a doctor who is being accused or sued in a court case. They are the person who is being accused of wrongdoing or negligence in their medical practice. Full definition
A med - mal plaintiff can not have documents from the physician - president of defendant doctor's current practice group that are protected by the work - product doctrine, including e-mail communications between the president, defendant and defendant's lawyer, but plaintiff may subpoena materials not covered by...
valawyersweekly.com
Defendant doctors failed to diagnosis stomach cancer in a patient who resided in Cape May County.
Plaintiff Patient is suing Defendant Doctor for unlawful disclosure of H.I.V. status and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The tribunal has subpoena power to order defendant doctors and other organizations to turn over documents.
Asked what his first trial was like as a practicing attorney at Lubin & Meyer, Satin says it's the first deposition of a defendant doctor that sticks in his mind more than a courtroom experience.
Mr. Regar convinced the defendant doctor's insurance company that the doctor had in fact failed to diagnose a lump which had been present for at least a year before the cancer was diagnosed.
A woman («the Patient») drove herself to the hospital and was treated by the defendant doctors.
Key to that claim was the determination of whether the defendant doctors had a duty, owed to the plaintiff as a third party, to warn the Patient of the effects of the medication.
The defendant doctor filed a motion for summary judgment.
The Ontario Court of Appeal held that any non-consensual touching which is harmful or offensive to a person's reasonable sense of dignity was actionable and found the defendant doctor who gave the unauthorized blood transfusion liable for the tort of battery despite this case being an emergency situation.
The defendant doctor applied the forceps to the child's head twice.
Proving liability against the defendant doctor, driver or manufacturer is substantially the same as it is in a personal injury lawsuit.
The law requires that in order to meet this burden of proof, a patient must prove their case with expert medical testimony by a physician who generally practices in the same specialty as the defendant doctor.
The defendant doctor then pushed the umbilical cord back into the uterine cavity.
Since the standard of medical care is not written in some book, it is important to use physicians who practice in the same specialty as the defendant doctor to analyze the medical / legal issues in the case.
Ultimately, the court concluded that the alleged negligence of the non-parties was properly admitted because it was required to give the defendant doctor a fair trial.
Earlier this month, one state appellate court issued a written opinion in a medical malpractice case brought by a woman who suffered serious injuries after a surgery that was performed by the defendant doctors.
A few months into the plaintiff - wife's pregnancy, an ultrasound was performed with one of the defendant doctors reviewing the results.
The plaintiff was a patient of the defendant doctor.
She discussed the idea with the defendant doctor, who explained the risks involved with the procedure.
Experts can also offer their opinions about whether the care provided by a defendant doctor fell below the generally accepted standard of care.
Prior to the surgery, however, the defendant doctor requested that the plaintiff sign a medical release waiver.
The plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant doctor, and in response, the doctor requested certain medical records pursuant to the rules of discovery.
The plaintiff underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure that was conducted by the defendant doctor.
A Virginia judge has rejected a defendant doctor's motion for a new trial after a $ 1.95 million medical malpractice verdict for the plaintiff who died following plastic surgery.
Nearly three hours later, another defendant doctor, also not board - certified at the time, saw the plaintiff.
The jury found in favor of the defendant doctors.
The facts briefly were that following a motorcycle accident, the Plaintiff was treated by the Defendant doctor and there were allegations that the doctor was negligent in providing that treatment.
Defense verdict in a case where the defendant doctor admitted significant alterations to the medical chart of the plaintiff's minor.
When applied by a court, the doctrine delays the triggering of the statute of limitations when the plaintiff is under the continued care of the defendant doctor.
The law imposes an objective standard, and measures the defendant doctor's conduct against that of a reasonable doctor.
The plaintiff was scheduled to have a total laparoscopic hysterectomy performed by the defendant doctor.
The court agreed with the plaintiff, reversing a lower court that had granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant doctor.
A defendant doctor or hospital does take notice of certain expert witnesses and may change how they evaluate a case depending on who the plaintiff hires.
An important tool in winning these cases is the ability of a trial judge and jury to draw an adverse inference against the defendant doctors, nurses and hospitals.
The defendant doctor, who apparently doubled as an expert witness (despite not being specialized in the sort of medical problems the plaintiff was suffering from), claimed that it did not matter when the plaintiff took his medications.
Conducting discovery by taking depositions of the defendant doctor, hospital employees, defense experts, etc.;
It is unlikely that members of its panels will necessarily possess special expertise relevant to the medical speciality of the defendant doctor, or experience at providing expert evidence.