It is much easier to secure interim payments from
the Defendant in cases where liability has been admitted.
The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) allows for an additional amount to be paid to a claimant by
a defendant in cases where the defendant has refused the claimant's offer to settle and the court has given judgment for the claimant which is at least as advantageous to the claimant as the claimant's offer.
Represented an individual
defendant in case where he was accused of violating his covenant not to compete.
Represented a corporate
defendant in a case where it was accused of defaming a manufacturer through advertisements.
Not exact matches
If jurors favor the death penalty
in some
cases, then it shouldn't be shocking that they'd vote for it
in a
case where the
defendant terrorized an entire city and killed and maimed innocent civilians.
The first line of
cases began with
In re Daou Sys., where the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision dismissing a Section 10 (b) action on the ground that the plaintiffs had not alleged any disclosures that defendants were engaging in improper accounting practice
In re Daou Sys.,
where the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision dismissing a Section 10 (b) action on the ground that the plaintiffs had not alleged any disclosures that
defendants were engaging
in improper accounting practice
in improper accounting practices.
In recent years, defendants in Section 10 (b) actions in the Ninth Circuit have routinely cited to the Metzler line of cases to support an argument that loss causation is absent in any case where losses were sustained prior to the market learning the fact that defendants had committed frau
In recent years,
defendants in Section 10 (b) actions in the Ninth Circuit have routinely cited to the Metzler line of cases to support an argument that loss causation is absent in any case where losses were sustained prior to the market learning the fact that defendants had committed frau
in Section 10 (b) actions
in the Ninth Circuit have routinely cited to the Metzler line of cases to support an argument that loss causation is absent in any case where losses were sustained prior to the market learning the fact that defendants had committed frau
in the Ninth Circuit have routinely cited to the Metzler line of
cases to support an argument that loss causation is absent
in any case where losses were sustained prior to the market learning the fact that defendants had committed frau
in any
case where losses were sustained prior to the market learning the fact that
defendants had committed fraud.
The fool on the other hand has rushed
in where the angels feared to tread, and the
case for Christianity is being lost by the default of the
defendants.»
We've seen
cases where defendants were either deceased years before the incident or
in prison when it happened.»
In Bradford, the local press reported that judges were expressing concern over two serious
cases where no legal representation was available for the
defendant.
«The
defendant who was the target
in this
case, George Maziarz, plead to a penal law charge
where the penalty was $ 1,000,» Assistant Attorney General Christopher Baynes said
in court.
Instead of convictions,
cases with white
defendants more often end
in adjournment
in contemplation of dismissal,
where the
case is adjourned for a period of time and later dismissed if the
defendant isn't arrested again..
Oliverio's statements on behalf LPCiminelli are part of the
defendants» legal strategy to move the court
case from the Southern District of New York
in Manhattan,
where Bharara is based, to the Western District
in Buffalo.
Since that announcement, we have passed secondary legislation to enable the police to prosecute an extra 150,000
cases through to completion by giving them the power to continue to prosecute
where a
defendant does not turn up
in court or pleads exceptional hardship.
With the
defendants indicted, the action
in Clean Sweep moved to the Ulster County Courthouse
where the sudden influx of drug
cases strained the resources of the district attorney's and the public defender's offices.
They cited three previous
cases where courts ruled such questions are «relevant and probative» when they concern a
defendant's actions
in the context of a securities fraud prosecution, including that of pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, whom Agnifilo represented.
All THAT being said, name a
case in New York, preferably high profile and not 50 years ago,
where someone LGBT got killed and the
defendant got acquitted using a gay / trans panic defense.
This gene already has figured
in a court
case in Italy, Hyman said,
where a
defendant's sentence was reduced based on testimony that he had the gene and was predisposed to violence.
The prosecutor
in Padua,
where the
case against a different group of
defendants resides, has asked to dismiss all charges as well.
He's given this opinion
in court on several occasions as an expert witness
in cases where a lawyer of a
defendant caught drink - driving has claimed that their client has undiagnosed auto - brewery syndrome.
In both cases, the defendants argued that this exposure was slight compared to the exposure to asbestos in the general atmosphere where the two women live
In both
cases, the
defendants argued that this exposure was slight compared to the exposure to asbestos
in the general atmosphere where the two women live
in the general atmosphere
where the two women lived.
If none of those motions finds traction
in the court, then four to six months from now, the
cases move to the discovery phase,
where the
defendants will have to start producing documents and providing evidence.
Mike Cernovich comments that city
defendants are the «frequent flyers» of verdicts
in civil rights actions,
in part because rulings like Kozinski's are rare: Cernovich can't recall a
case where an appellant was assessed double costs for filing a civil appeal.
In a rather unusual
case, an Ontario Superior Court judge has set aside a default judgment that was obtained at an uncontested trial
where the
defendant intentionally decided not to show up.
Lawyer - clients come up frequently with institutional clients
where in - house counsel is the client contact and
in legal ethics
cases where lawyers are respondents or
defendants; they can also be the client
in any other matter
where an individual is the client, as lawyers do have lives too.
But perhaps
in a
case where the
defendant is acquitted, or proven innocent, a takings argument could be run by analogy with the
cases dealing with innocent people who suffered loss as a result of police execution of search warrants.
[34]
In Resurfice, this Court summarized the cases as holding that a material contribution approach may be appropriate where it is «impossible» for the plaintiff to prove causation on the «but for» test and where it is clear that the defendant breached its duty of care (acted negligently) in a way that exposed the plaintiff to an unreasonable risk of injur
In Resurfice, this Court summarized the
cases as holding that a material contribution approach may be appropriate
where it is «impossible» for the plaintiff to prove causation on the «but for» test and
where it is clear that the
defendant breached its duty of care (acted negligently)
in a way that exposed the plaintiff to an unreasonable risk of injur
in a way that exposed the plaintiff to an unreasonable risk of injury.
As will become clearer when we discuss the
cases, «material contribution» as a substitute for the usual requirement of «but for» causation only applies
where it is impossible to say that a particular
defendant's negligent act
in fact caused the injury.
In two recent high profile US cases, one jury found for the plaintiff where the two songs had almost nothing in common (Got ta Give it Up and Blurred Lines) whereas in the other case, the jury found for the defendant even though there was significant borrowing from the plaintiff's composition (Taurus and Stairway to Heaven
In two recent high profile US
cases, one jury found for the plaintiff
where the two songs had almost nothing
in common (Got ta Give it Up and Blurred Lines) whereas in the other case, the jury found for the defendant even though there was significant borrowing from the plaintiff's composition (Taurus and Stairway to Heaven
in common (Got ta Give it Up and Blurred Lines) whereas
in the other case, the jury found for the defendant even though there was significant borrowing from the plaintiff's composition (Taurus and Stairway to Heaven
in the other
case, the jury found for the
defendant even though there was significant borrowing from the plaintiff's composition (Taurus and Stairway to Heaven).
[As regards the fourth submission Mr Nathan relies on another dictum of Potter LJ
in Downing
where he said: «The burden of proving that any of the grounds
in s. 9 (4) has been made out lies upon the claimant and, if the
defendant can raise an arguable
case in favour of validity, a stay should be granted: Hume v AA Mutual International Insurance Co Ltd [1996] LRLR 19.»]
The SJC for the first time ruled that a judicial error of law does not bar recovery
in a legal malpractice
case where a
defendant law firm was negligent for failing to prevent or mitigate the legal error.
The State's courts have shown no reluctance to strike punitive damage awards
in cases where punitive liability is not established, so that
defendant qualifies for judgment on that issue as a matter of law.
We also act
in cases where innocent third parties are affected by orders made
in criminal
cases against
defendants.
We represent foreign countries sometimes, we sue
where one country sues another country and we'll take the
defendant in some of these
cases.
The dismissal of an action
where there has been an admission of liability, as
in in this
case, would be a particularly draconian remedy for the contempt that has delayed the
defendants acquisition of evidence to which they are entitled.
In Merchantbridge, Mackie QC HHJ said that «This is not a
case where the [costs]
defendants attract moral blame, but they took a decision to fund the defence of an action
where they had, amongst other things, an interest of their own to protect.»
Torts cover a
defendant's actions that were accidental such as negligence
in a car accident
case as well as wrongs
where the
defendant intended to hurt an individual, group or business.
In mesothelioma cases the most important factors in this determination are where you were exposed to the asbestos, where you live, and the identity and location of the defendant (s
In mesothelioma
cases the most important factors
in this determination are where you were exposed to the asbestos, where you live, and the identity and location of the defendant (s
in this determination are
where you were exposed to the asbestos,
where you live, and the identity and location of the
defendant (s).
Mr. Chamberlin moved from Steamboat Springs, Colorado to Phoenix, Arizona
in 1985,
where his practice primarily focused on insurance defense while with the firm of Black, Robertshaw & Copple, P.C.. On behalf of
defendants, Mr. Chamberlin tried numerous commercial, construction, homeowner's association, fire loss and commercial trucking defense
cases to defense verdicts.
It is unlikely the
defendant would invest capital
in that line of defence for this
case, but it is reasonable to say the plaintiff's burden on causation would be somewhat heavier than
in a
case where the force of the accident is not really
in issue, which weigh
in favour of a trial
in this court.
In a useful reminder for parties who might not otherwise consider themselves to be subject to English jurisdiction, in the recent case of Bestolov v Povarenkin, the High Court confirmed that, where a defendant is domiciled in England, the courts of this country have jurisdiction and moreover no discretion to decline jurisdictio
In a useful reminder for parties who might not otherwise consider themselves to be subject to English jurisdiction,
in the recent case of Bestolov v Povarenkin, the High Court confirmed that, where a defendant is domiciled in England, the courts of this country have jurisdiction and moreover no discretion to decline jurisdictio
in the recent
case of Bestolov v Povarenkin, the High Court confirmed that,
where a
defendant is domiciled
in England, the courts of this country have jurisdiction and moreover no discretion to decline jurisdictio
in England, the courts of this country have jurisdiction and moreover no discretion to decline jurisdiction.
Many of fraud
cases may be classified as federal crimes
where the
case is heard
in the state and federal courts which subject the
defendant to more penalties upon conviction.
Under the Lagos High Court Civil Procedure Rules 2012, once a
case is filed
in court, ADR is then used
where there is a response showing some kind of admission on the part of the
defendant.
In other words, let's say you have a Maryland accident
case where the
defendant has a $ 100,000 liability policy and the injury victim has a $ 300,000 uninsured / underinsured motorist policy.
Symbion Power LLC v Venco Imtiaz Construction Company [2017] EWHC 348 (TCC)-- We acted successfully for the
defendant, Venco,
in this High Court
case where the Court rejected an application to set aside an ICC arbitration award for serious irregularity under section 68 (2)(d) of the Arbitration Act 1996 on the basis that the tribunal had failed to deal with issues which were put to it.
In that case, where the defendants had been convicted on two counts of conspiracy to corrupt public morals and conspiracy to outrage public decency in respect of the publication of a magazine which contained advertisements inviting readers to engage in homosexual acts, the House of Lords was split about whether a common law offence of conspiracy to outrage public decency existe
In that
case,
where the
defendants had been convicted on two counts of conspiracy to corrupt public morals and conspiracy to outrage public decency
in respect of the publication of a magazine which contained advertisements inviting readers to engage in homosexual acts, the House of Lords was split about whether a common law offence of conspiracy to outrage public decency existe
in respect of the publication of a magazine which contained advertisements inviting readers to engage
in homosexual acts, the House of Lords was split about whether a common law offence of conspiracy to outrage public decency existe
in homosexual acts, the House of Lords was split about whether a common law offence of conspiracy to outrage public decency existed.
decided
in a copyright
case that one had to look at a real and substantial connection between the
defendants and the jurisdiction of the court — or administrative tribunal — but not at
where the server happened to be.
Thus
in Sedley's
case (1675) Strange 168, 1 Sid 168, the
defendant pleaded guilty to outraging public decency
where he had appeared naked on the balcony of a house and had urinated on several people present.
Melissa has also served as an Assistant Public Defender
in Broward County
where she represented indigent criminal
defendants charged
in a variety of
cases ranging from misdemeanors to first degree felonies.
The Religion Clause blog has a blurb about a
case decided by a Montana trial court back
in May
where the court refused to suppress testimony about the
defendant's confession to a pastor of his involvement
in a homicide.