Unlike criminal cases, the burden is on the plaintiff to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that
the defendant was at fault for the accident.
Establishing that
a defendant was at fault for an accident is a meaningless exercise unless there is something to be obtained as a result.
Not exact matches
In Codner v. Goss, the
defendant driver rear - ended a vehicle, but their defense
was that they suffered a blackout and
were not
at fault for the car
accident.
Massachusetts has a modified comparative negligence statute whereby you must prove that the
defendant or
defendants were at least 51 %
at fault for your
accident or you will not recover anything.
RCW 4.22.070 (1)(b) provides that you can then collect all damages awarded to you from any
defendant found to
be partially
at fault for the
accident, regardless of the percentage of
fault attributable to any other
defendant.
The
Defendant admitted
fault for the crash but denied liability to the Plaintiff claiming that the Plaintiff «
was not present in the vehicle
at the time of the
accident ``.
This information
was important in convincing the
defendant's insurance company that they should change their position that the
defendant was not
at fault for the
accident.
The trial court agreed with the plaintiff, ruling that there
was no issue
for the jury to decide with regard to liability, and that the
defendant was 100 %
at fault for the
accident.
Iowa law allows you to file a personal injury lawsuit after a truck
accident case as long as you
were not more
at fault than the
defendant for causing the crash.
So in a pure uninsured motorist case where the other driver either can not
be identified (hit - and - run or phantom vehicle
are the most prominent examples) or has no insurance, your own insurance company essentially steps in the shoes of the
defendant, assuming the
at -
fault driver's liability
for the
accident but also his damages.
This
is true
for situations like the present case, where the
at -
fault party died
at the time of the
accident, or
for times when a
defendant dies before a personal injury case
is finalized.
What if there
is more than one
defendant, or you
are partly
at fault for the
accident?
Therefore, as in other negligence claims, in wrongful death claims, the plaintiff must prove that the
defendant is legally
at fault for the
accident and that the
accident was the proximate cause of the injury or death.
The
Defendant argued that the Plaintiff
was partially
at fault for the
accident for wearing dark clothing, not having a flashlight and not wearing a reflective traffic vest.
In this case the court held that both the Plaintiff and
Defendant were 50 %
at fault for the
accident.
In the case of Beavers v. Victorian, the United States District Court
for the Western District of Oklahoma rejected the
defendants» arguments that a motor carrier could not
be held liable
for negligently hiring an «independent contractor» that
was at fault for injuries sustained in a semi truck
accident.