Sentences with phrase «defendants by this clause»

Here again, States must be suable or liable to be made defendants by this clause, which has a similar mode of language with the two other clauses I have remarked upon.

Not exact matches

By accepting the certificate of analysis into evidence without first allowing defense voir dire / cross examination questioning of the machine operator accepts that attestation clause as reliable without allowing the defendant not only to challenge not only whether the witness is reliable, credible and with sufficient recall, but also to challenge whether the witness properly and according to DFS procedure operated this claimed sophisticated piece of machinery that thusly requires a commensurate level of sophistication in understanding the machinery and using it.

The Religion Clause blog has a blurb about a case decided by a Montana trial court back in May where the court refused to suppress testimony about the defendant's confession to a pastor of his involvement in a homicide.

In Sumukan v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, [2007] All ER (D) 341 (Mar) the Court of Appeal held that it was sufficient for the contract to expressly include an arbitration clause which in turn referred to the statute and rules of the relevant arbitral tribunal — in this case the Commonweath Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal (CSAT), which was a body created and constituted by the defendant.

Next, Congress could also delay collateral attacks on the conviction by turning writs of Habeas Corpus proceedings into second trial by adding some clause that if the respondent to the writ does not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner committed the crime from the evidence heard during the proceeding, the writ shall be issued, which essentially means the defendant's original trial is invalidated.

In a fairly recent decision, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found in favour of the defendants on summary judgement, dismissing an action by the plaintiff - employer for alleged breach of a non-competition clause.

In this case, the defendant employer could have avoided this outcome by inserting a valid termination clause into the plaintiff's employment contract, prior to acceptance, that specified either a fixed notice period or a notice period that was readily calculable.

The merger agreement included a clause in which the defendant agreed to pay shareholders an additional amount determined by the average number of unique users of plaintiff's MP3 player during a specified period, to be determined by tracking software.

The defendants collectively moved to stay the Plaintiff's claim, relying on a forum selection clause in the ESA which stated: «The contractual parties agree that German law is binding and to settle any disputes by a binding arbitration through the «Industrie und Handelskammer» (Chamber of Commerce) in Frankfurt.»

The effect of the assignment was that the benefit of the break clause was lost but this consequence was not drawn to the claimants» attention by the defendant.

The case, currently pending before the Court, will address whether a court violates a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause when it allows an expert witness to testify about the results of DNA testing conducted by another analyst who has not appeared as a witness at the trial.

Here are some highlights on the predictions offered by the panelists: 1) class actions are not going away; 2) the continued growth of mass commerce will continue to spawn class action litigation; 3) Justice Scalia's death will have a significant impact on class action jurisprudence going forward and the judiciary is likely to get less friendly to defendants in the short - term; 4) technology will make a big difference for the better in managing class action litigation; 5) defendants will continue to come up with creative, far - reaching ways of limiting class actions; 6) plaintiffs» attorneys will continue to bring class actions when a) they think they can make money and / or b) they think they will advance the public good; 7) there will be some good class actions and some horrible ones; 8) look out for states to pass new consumer protection laws similar to the New Jersey New Jersey Truth - in - Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA); 9) the TCPA and all - natural litigation booms will continue in the near future; 10) The CFPB will broadly define consumer finance services; 11) more class actions will go to trial; 12) what happens with the enforceability of arbitration clauses will have a big impact on the viability of many categories of class actions in the future; 13) look for more class actions in the federal courts in New York state.

It is fairly evident that the Committee tried to instrumentalize its FR in order to provide the other constitutional authorities (the Government and — most certainly — the Judiciary) with somewhat of a saving (or escaping) clause in order to overcome the stagnation caused by the Margellos doctrine and the ICJ's authoritative distinction between procedural conditions, such as the jurisdictional immunity of the defendant State, and the merits of the case, even if the contested affair involves grave violations of jus cogens norms.

Namazi Real Estate Corp. v. Johnson (243 A.D. 2d 396)-- broker's motion for summary judgment denied and defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint affirmed; broker failed to establish they produced a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase the property at terms set by sellers; parties were not in agreement as to the closing date, the clause entitling defendants to terminate the contract unconditionally, and the date when the defendants would vacate the premises; broker failed to establish that sellers wrongfully or arbitrarily prevented completion of a deal.