Sentences with phrase «defendants claim»

They included the assertions: «I also understand that defendants claim that Suri was «feeling abandoned» during this time period.

The defendants claim that the proposed class is not sufficiently common to meet requirements under s. 4 (1)(c) of the CPA,

The British Columbia Court of Appeal will decide within a few months in Taseka Mines v Western Canadian Wilderness Committee, a defamation suit that the defendants claim is a SLAPP action meant to stop their campaign against a proposed mine.

In response, defendants claim that they wanted to gather additional evidence to ensure that they would prevail on a motion to dismiss based on fraud.

Bhakta was deemed unfit to be the CEO of WhistlePig for a half dozen incidents of irresponsible behavior that are, the defendants claim, indications of a character unfit to lead the whiskey company.

Claim: Defendants claim that they were not made aware of equity granted to Danhee Bhakta, Bhakta's wife and WhistlePig's marketing director.

Defendant claims fully - clothed images of female colleague were available on a pornographic website

«During that call, the defendant claimed, in substance and in part, that there was no issue with him [Silver] getting the fees because he «only represented the LLCs» controlled by Glenwood,» a filing in Manhattan federal court said.

In the recently concluded Scopes - like trial of Kitzmiller v. Dover School District, one of the defendants claimed not to know the source of the funds for 60 copies of an intelligent - design book, which he admitted to only having glanced through, for the school library.

Lydia Parnes, acting director of the FTC bureau of consumer protection says, the defendant claims fly in the face of reality.

The defendants claimed qualified immunity, which requires courts to rule in favor of a government employee unless the conduct violates «clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.»

Amazon was caught in the crossfire of the suit and received the bulk of the criticism, as supporters of the defendants claimed the price fixing was necessary to «take down» Amazon.

The defendants claimed that Lanzana was a successful forex trader and encouraged their (prospective) clients to invest in off - exchange forex pools.

When the defendants refused to share the sale proceeds with the plaintiff in recognition of her contribution to the coach house, the plaintiff sued the defendants claiming a beneficial interest...

Today the Slaw blog highlighted R. v. McKay, a very interesting Canadian case in which a 19 - year - old defendant claims he was not given a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to counsel.

The FBI hacked into Ulbricht's computer to find evidence against him, which the defendants claimed as unconstitutional since it was a search and seizure of property without a warrant.

Another significant concern was that the area where the accident occurred was poorly lit and the defendant claimed that our client, who was wearing dark clothes at the time, was not visible.

Nevertheless, the laser - happy defendant claimed that the sentencing enhancement for reckless conduct shouldn't apply — despite intentionally shining the laser at the helicopter while being fully aware of the risk of harming the pilot and endangering the lives of those onboard the helicopter.

The court explained that when a defendant claims that service was improper, the burden rests with the defendant to explain why.

Newkirk sued Conagra Foods and other defendants claiming that his condition was «popcorn lung» caused by his eating «between five to seven bags of microwave popcorn each day for about 11 years.»

The defendants claimed they had refused to accept delivery from the Peerless which had sailed... [more]

The defendants claimed that they had no liability because the step down was an open and obvious condition.

The defendant claimed that the plaintiff was aware of the risks involved with moving broken glass, and he should be precluded from recovering compensation for his injuries.

The defendant claimed that the plaintiff's allegation that «something» caused her to fall was insufficient to establish that it was the divot in the photograph.

The defendant claims that he provided his wife with a pillow and a blanket, went to bed, and later awoke to find her dead — smothered by their 75 - pound Labrador Retriever, he speculates.

The defendants claimed this claim undermined comity, given the findings of fraud and their attempts to oppose enforcement in the U.S..

The defendants claimed that Dunkin' Donuts allowed them to continue to operate the Florissant store, during the pendency of the termination litigation, and that they should receive relief from their expenditures in developing that store.

Here the defendant claims they are in fact the ones that have been wronged seeking damages as a result.

The classic example is when a defendant claims indemnity from a third party or, as Justice Johnstone wrote in Escobar:

The defendants claimed that the woman was not suffering from a trauma - related injury and the second accident could have been the cause of her pain.

Of does the judge have to allow any defense, no mater how tedious, if the defendant claims it would help their cause?

When the defendant claims a spotless driving record the defendant is introducing character or a character trait into the trial.

# 1,000,000 claim for breach of contract resulting from a failure to pay for goods supplied, the Defendant claiming that the goods were unfit for purpose.

The defendants claimed that their welding rods did not release asbestos fibers and their products did not contribute to the plaintiff's lung cancer.

The management buyout of insurance defendant claims firm Plexus Law from the now defunct Parabis Group was supported by # 4.2 million of debt finance from new British challenger bank OakNorth Bank, which is backed by Mambu, the SaaS banking platform provider.

The Defendant claimed that when the parties separated he had paid the Plaintiff $ 2,500 to settle issues between them, which he had thought included payment for Luna.

The plaintiff sued the defendant claiming that the defendant had been negligent in his operation of his motor vehicle.

The defendant claimed that the insurance policy should not be triggered because there was no accident involving the school bus.

$ 35,000.00 settlement in disputed liability case where child hit in a parking lot, defendant claimed child jumped on car;

The question therefore still remains; what is the position of the law on an application for a transfer of a suit which the defendant claims are being instituted in the wrong part of the region?

The defendants claimed that the plaintiffs, as experienced litigants, should have diarized the trial scheduling deadline.

The Defendant claimed that Mr. Gordon talked of senior personnel in the company in very derogatory terms and that he swore considerably to the point that it made working with him unbearable.

These Listserve postings were then leaked to a broader audience, which the defendant claimed led several insurance companies to discontinue using his services, resulting in significant damages.

The Washington Post reported yesterday that the U.S. music industry's knuckle rapper, the RIAA, has come up with a new argument in a lawsuit against a defendant it claims has violated copyright.

In today's case (Cabezas v. HMTQ) the Plaintiff was involved in a single vehicle accident and sued the Defendants claiming negligent highway maintenance.

However, the Defendants claimed that the proposed class here could not opt out because s. 5 (1) of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 forbids any contract or waiver that would abridge an employee's rights under the Act.

Wallbridge named Williams as a defendant claiming that Williams was vicariously liable for the defamatory comments, misrepresentations and allegations of Brunning.

The female defendant claimed duress but the evidence was that the lawyer for the defendants informed them of the full and final settlement agreement and all issues were accepted.

Not exact matches

Ironically, when Defendant Carter purchased the TIDAL Music Service in 2015, it claimed it would be the first streaming service to pay the artists.

For example, the complaint claims that Lemon general counsel (and current Xapo president) Cynthia McAdam «often claimed the need to work from home,» but actually was working from Xapo's Palo Alto offices on Xapo business (she is named as a defendant).