Defendants in the case include Bank of America, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, UBS, various of their subsidiaries, as well as EquiLend, which is owned by the banks and investors including BlackRock, Northern Trust and State Street.
Other
defendants in the case include a former Agriculture Department microbiologist credited with coining the term «pink slime» in a 2002 email to colleagues.
Defendants in the case include three former executives from LPCiminelli, the giant Buffalo general contracting firm, as well as Alain Kaloyeros, the former SUNY Polytechnic Institute leader who ran several of Cuomo's major initiatives, including the Buffalo Billion.
The defendants in that case include Alain Kaloyeros, former president and CEO of the SUNY Polytechnic Institute, who's accused of rigging bids for a $ 750,000 contract tied to that project and $ 105 million in contracts for a film studio and manufacturing plant near Syracuse.
Other
defendants in this case include Kelly, a former executive with Competitive Power Ventures (CPV), which has for years been developing a controversial gas - fired power plant in Orange County, N.Y., while successfully pushing one in Oxford; and Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi, top executives with COR Development of Syracuse, which secured contracts on a number of projects initiated by Albany - based SUNY Polytechnic Institute.
Among the other
defendants in the case include «XYZ Businesses» with no specific numbers mentioned, a person named Jimmy Kwok along with 50 John Does.
The defendants in the case included, among others, ABC, the show's production companies and the show's executive producer.
Not exact matches
Specifically,
Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was engaged
in predatory lending practices that saddled subprime borrowers and / or those with poor or limited credit histories with high - interest rate debt that they could not repay; (ii) many of the Company's customers were using Qudian - provided loans to repay their existing loans, thereby inflating the Company's revenues and active borrower numbers and increasing the likelihood of defaults; (iii) the Company was providing online loans to college students despite a governmental ban on the practice; (iv) the Company was engaged overly aggressive and improper collection practices; (v) the Company had understated the number of its non-performing loans
in the Registration Statement and Prospectus; (vi) because of the Company's improper lending, underwriting and collection practices it was subject to a heightened risk of adverse actions by Chinese regulators; (vii) the Company's largest sales platform and strategic partner, Alipay, and Ant Financial, could unilaterally cap the APR for loans provided by Qudian; (viii) the Company had failed to implement necessary safeguards to protect customer data; (ix) data for nearly one million Company customers had been leaked for sale to the black market,
including names, addresses, phone numbers, loan information, accounts and,
in some
cases, passwords to CHIS, the state - backed higher - education qualification verification institution
in China, subjecting the Company to undisclosed risks of penalties and financial and reputational harm; and (x) as a result of the foregoing, Qudian's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
Specifically, BPI was seeking all of my confidential communications
in 2012 with the
defendants in the
case,
including employees of ABC News and the two former USDA microbiologists who first expressed concern about the meat filler
in private emails later made public by the New York Times.
In June, Soares announced a three - part plan that
included a component to allow
defendants between 16 and 24 to resolve
cases without a criminal record or any time behind bars.
In describing prosecutors»
case against their
defendants —
including Buffalo businessman Louis Ciminelli and former SUNY Polytechnic Institute President Alain Kaloyeros — the team of lawyers wrote of the government's «untenable» legal theory, «meager allegations,» and «ill - conceived and improper interpretation of the law.»
The exhibit, Gitner wrote,
includes images of
defendants tried and convicted
in newsworthy
cases,
including text and news clippings describing the
cases.
Lawyers for the
defendants deny the charges and have been seeking to toss the
case on a number of grounds over the past year,
including court decisions
in unrelated public corruption
cases.
They cited three previous
cases where courts ruled such questions are «relevant and probative» when they concern a
defendant's actions
in the context of a securities fraud prosecution,
including that of pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, whom Agnifilo represented.
Kaloyeros and the other
defendants in the
case,
including several prominent upstate developers and a former top aide to Cuomo, have all pleaded not guilty
in the
case.
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara on Monday charged Skelos with corruption charges that
include extorting real estate execs and a environmental firm to enrich his son, Adam, also a
defendant in the
case.
Oliverio said the judge has not yet ruled on the request by several
defendants,
including Ciminelli, to move the
case against three former LPCiminellli executives, along with Kaloyeros and two Syracuse developers, to a courtroom
in Buffalo.
Caproni called the venue change request «insufficient,» siding with prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's office
in Manhattan that keeping the
case in New York City is appropriate because some of the alleged crimes
included emails and calls between the Buffalo
defendants and individuals
in New York City.
In a 48 - page order, U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni issued a series of legal rejections against defense lawyers in the Buffalo Billion case, including bids to dismiss the indictments against the defendants and to change the case's venue to Western New Yor
In a 48 - page order, U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni issued a series of legal rejections against defense lawyers
in the Buffalo Billion case, including bids to dismiss the indictments against the defendants and to change the case's venue to Western New Yor
in the Buffalo Billion
case,
including bids to dismiss the indictments against the
defendants and to change the
case's venue to Western New York.
Rape
cases Campaigners today lashed out at the pledge to extend anonymity
in rape
cases from victims to
include defendants.
A second judge argued that the statute was even unconstitutional as applied to the particular plaintiffs
in this
case, who
included several
defendants who wished to publish swinger ads
in the magazine illustrated with sexually - explicit pictures but did not want to sacrifice their anonymity.
Six
defendants,
including the second principal
in the
case, pleaded guilty Monday
in the Atlanta Public Schools test - cheating scandal.
Each of the
defendants named
in the California
case has made public statements accepting that human emissions contribute to climate change, and that climate change poses various risks,
including to their businesses --
As New York Times reporter Luanne White reports
in this article, In New Orleans, Rust in the Wheels of Justice (11/21/06), in the aftermath of Katrina, «as many as 500 defendants, mostly in drug, theft and assault cases, have been freed because of problems with evidence, including difficulty in finding the witnesses who have moved away.&raqu
in this article,
In New Orleans, Rust in the Wheels of Justice (11/21/06), in the aftermath of Katrina, «as many as 500 defendants, mostly in drug, theft and assault cases, have been freed because of problems with evidence, including difficulty in finding the witnesses who have moved away.&raqu
In New Orleans, Rust
in the Wheels of Justice (11/21/06), in the aftermath of Katrina, «as many as 500 defendants, mostly in drug, theft and assault cases, have been freed because of problems with evidence, including difficulty in finding the witnesses who have moved away.&raqu
in the Wheels of Justice (11/21/06),
in the aftermath of Katrina, «as many as 500 defendants, mostly in drug, theft and assault cases, have been freed because of problems with evidence, including difficulty in finding the witnesses who have moved away.&raqu
in the aftermath of Katrina, «as many as 500
defendants, mostly
in drug, theft and assault cases, have been freed because of problems with evidence, including difficulty in finding the witnesses who have moved away.&raqu
in drug, theft and assault
cases, have been freed because of problems with evidence,
including difficulty
in finding the witnesses who have moved away.&raqu
in finding the witnesses who have moved away.»
According to ILR's study Think Globally, Sue Locally, transnational
cases are characterized by a number of features,
including aggressive media tactics, organized protests and boycotts of corporate
defendants, political pressure and,
in some
cases, outright fraud and abuse by plaintiffs» lawyers.
Plaintiffs
in this
case are major food manufacturers (
including Kraft, Kellogg's, and General Mills) who purchased egg products from egg supplier
defendants.
She has represented both plaintiffs and
defendants in cases on a wide variety of claims,
including breach of contract, fraud, defamation, and civil liability for cyberstalking.
Cases I have represented the
Defendant on
include Verlade v Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust [2017] a high value brain injury claim relating to pediatric intensive care which was successfully defended and AS v Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust [2017] a significant Bolam judgement concerning pioneering techniques used
in pediatric cardiac surgery
in 1998
in which liability was repudiated on the grounds that there was no established body of opinion on brain cooling at the time.
The group, which also
includes professionals
in the firm's Washington, Chicago and Phoenix offices, has handled litigation
in more than 30 states
in cases ranging from putative nationwide class actions and mass actions for personal injury and property damage to complex environmental investigation and / or remediation issues and matters involving multiple
defendants and hundreds of products.
Cove has represented plaintiffs and
defendants in federal and state antitrust
cases,
including price fixing, boycott and monopolization
cases, direct and indirect purchaser class actions, and unfair competition actions
in federal and state courts across the country.
He represents both claimants and
defendants and has great experience
in all types of clinical negligence actions
including cases against hospitals, general practitioners and associated healthcare professionals.
The potential
defendants in your truck accident
case could
include:
Isabel practises
in both Claimant and
Defendant public law and human rights
cases,
including in the fields of healthcare, tax, and immigration.
Possible legal theories that can be argued
in a products liability
case include negligence (lack of reasonable care
in the manufacture or sale of the product or
in warning about the product), breach of warranty (failure to fulfill the terms of a promise regarding the product's performance), misrepresentation (giving consumers a false sense of security about a product's safety), and strict liability (under which the product's defect, although not the fault of the
defendant, rendered the product unreasonably dangerous and the
defendant is therefore responsible).
The targeted
defendants in these product liability
cases will most likely be the designers and manufacturers of these types of autonomous products and their systems and components,
including particularly the designers and manufacturers who are responsible for the design of perception system radiuses and capabilities
in those products, and their decision - making controller systems.
However,
in this
case the defense team was betting on the 50 % rule, which works like this: if the defense team could convince the jury that the plaintiff (my client, the injured motorcyclist) is more than 50 % at fault for the crash, the
defendant (the negligent minivan driver) would not have to pay for non-economic damages, which
include pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, scarring and disfigurement, and other long - term problems as a result of the crash.
In that kind of
case, the
defendant might think it's a good idea to ask the judge to instruct the jury on a lesser
included offense — that is, to explain to the jury what the lesser
included offense is and give it the option of convicting on that basis.
She represents creditors, bankruptcy trustees, and
defendants in complex bankruptcy and litigation
cases,
including fraudulent and preferential transfer proceedings.
I specialise
in defendant clinical negligence litigation working on a broad range of
cases including complex surgical, intensive care, obstetric and orthopaedic claims.
Our Law.com blog compatriot Howard Bashman is also following developments
in the
case and posting the legal pleadings,
including the complaint, the Web site owner's motion to dismiss and affidavit, and now
defendant Alesia Roskov's answer and counterclaim.
Because these orders are almost always sought without notice to the
defendant, a plaintiff is required to make «full and frank disclosure» to the court,
including the weaknesses
in the plaintiff's
case.
In Sumukan v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, [2007] All ER (D) 341 (Mar) the Court of Appeal held that it was sufficient for the contract to expressly include an arbitration clause which in turn referred to the statute and rules of the relevant arbitral tribunal — in this case the Commonweath Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal (CSAT), which was a body created and constituted by the defendan
In Sumukan v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, [2007] All ER (D) 341 (Mar) the Court of Appeal held that it was sufficient for the contract to expressly
include an arbitration clause which
in turn referred to the statute and rules of the relevant arbitral tribunal — in this case the Commonweath Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal (CSAT), which was a body created and constituted by the defendan
in turn referred to the statute and rules of the relevant arbitral tribunal —
in this case the Commonweath Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal (CSAT), which was a body created and constituted by the defendan
in this
case the Commonweath Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal (CSAT), which was a body created and constituted by the
defendant.
The particular circumstances of the
case, which
include the relative ages of the plaintiff and
defendant, the relationship between the plaintiff and
defendant, and the repetitive nature of the abuse, will be considered
in relationship to the establishment of the egregiousness of the
defendant's conduct and the severity of the plaintiff's resulting emotional distress.
The skilled Florida injury attorneys at the law firm of Friedman, Rodman & Frank have extensive experience representing clients
in a wide range of South Florida accident
cases,
including slip - and - fall accidents and other
cases naming local government entities as
defendants.
Later, prevailing
defendant moved for $ 89,460.90
in fees (
including all of its efforts
in the
case based on a contractual fees clause), with the trial judge deciding the fee number was $ 66,333.72.
He has represented both plaintiffs and
defendants in cases involving a wide variety of claims,
including breach of contract, professional malpractice, personal injury, insurance bad faith, and debt and judgment collection actions.
The judge admitted that the relationship between the priest and the
defendants was not like a regular employment contract, but
in this
case, he opted to look at certain special factors,
including the nature and closeness of the relationship between the priest and the
defendant, and the connection between the tortious act and the purpose of the relationship / employment / appointment, which was based on the factors outlined below.
Our civil litigation lawyers represent plaintiffs and
defendants including individuals, partnerships, shareholders and corporations
in the following types of
cases:
The situation
in Tamminga was almost identical to Forsythe's
case, and many of the same arguments were raised,
including the connection between the plaintiff's insurance contract and the
defendant tortfeasor.
When determining what percentage to award, the judge referenced not only the two factors
in the
defendant's favour, but also considered the claimants» complaints of the
defendant's conduct throughout the
case,
including but not limited to the
defendant's failure to answer a pre-action protocol letter, its failure to disclose relevant documents, and its rejection of settlements and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) offers.