Sentences with phrase «defendants violated»

The homeowners alleged that the real estate defendants violated Washington's Consumer Protection Act by failing to provide them with the requisite warnings.

The suit, filed by San Diego - based law firm Taylor - Copeland Law on behalf of plaintiff and Tezos ICO contributor Andrew Baker, alleges that the defendants violated U.S. securities law through the token sale.

In the case of United States v. Scheinberg, against the founders of the three largest online poker companies, PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker and Cereus (Absolute Poker / Ultimatebet), and a handful of their associates, which alleges that the defendants violated the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) and engaged in bank fraud and money laundering in order to process transfers to and from their customers.

In finding that the defendants violated the statute, we may not treat as established fact that the Communist Party in this country is of significant size, well organized, well disciplined, conditioned to embark on unlawful activity when given the command.

The cases revolve generally around whether the defendants violated copyright by sharing Malibu's copyrighted material by using BitTorrent.

The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by entering into a series of vertical agreements that required the distributors to sell cable television channels only in prepackaged bundles and prohibited sale to consumers on an «a la carte» or unbundled basis.

Count III of the Complaint asserts that the individual defendants violated Chapter 93A § 11.

The agency also alleged that the defendants violated the CROA by charging an advance fee for credit repair services.

The complaint also alleges the defendants violated federal privacy law for failing to provide a required privacy notice.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants violated several key antitrust acts by forcing Amazon to raise the price of ebooks or risk losing access to the digital editions of books from those five publishing houses.

In addition, the complaint alleges that the defendants violated the FTC Act by using a deceptive format in at least two of their infomercials to suggest falsely that the infomercials were independent television programs, rather than paid commercial advertising.»

The FTC's complaint alleges that the Window Rock defendants violated the FTC Act by making deceptive efficacy claims for CortiSlim and CortiStress.

In Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. McDonnell et al., the CFTC alleged that the defendants violated the CEA by operating a fraudulent scheme involving virtual currency trading and misappropriating investor funds.3 The primary issue before the court was whether the CFTC had standing to sue the defendants under the CEA.

On May 3, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint alleging that, during that same period, all of the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b - 5 (b) by concealing material information and making false statements related to Parent's acquisition of Autonomy and that certain defendants violated SEC Rule 10b - 5 (a) and (c) by engaging in a «scheme» to defraud investors.

10b - 5 (b) by concealing material information and making false statements related to Parent's acquisition of Autonomy and that certain defendants violated SEC Rule 10b - 5 (a) and (c) by engaging in a «scheme» to defraud investors.

In re HP Securities Litigation consists of two consolidated putative class actions filed on November 26 and 30, 2012 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging, among other things, that from August 19, 2011 to November 20, 2012, the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act by concealing material information and making false statements related to Parent's acquisition of Autonomy and the financial performance of Parent's enterprise services business.

The SEC has carried its burden of showing a likelihood of success of proving at trial that the three defendants violated Section 5 in selling their shares.

On May 3, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint alleging that, during that same period, all of the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule

«This defendant violated the trust of his office and his constituents,» Townes said in Brooklyn Federal Court.

District Attorney Thomas P. Zugibe stated that on or about November 16, 2011, September 5, 2011, and September 4, 2011, defendant violated orders of protection in favor of his mother and father, and thereby caused physical injury to his mother, and damaged property belonging to his parents.

Cops say the defendant violated Orders of Protection twice on April 14 ordering him to stay away from two residences in Tomkins Cove.

What's The Vital Nutrients Settlement About This action alleges that Defendant violated California state law by improperly labeling and selling its products as being «Made in USA.»

All judges and law clerks want to know whether you agree with the underlying policies of a statute — not whether the defendant violated the statute.

Proving that a defendant violated a statute or regulation may help a victim or their family bring a claim under a theory of negligence per se.

Where the defendant has no prior DWI convictions, the magistrate — after finding probable cause that the defendant violated the DWI law — will suspend the defendant's driver's license for seven days, whether or not the defendant refused to take the breath test.

This means «negligence as a matter of law,» and it may apply when a defendant violated a law that was meant to protect people like the victim from the type of harm that the victim suffered.

The rewrite saves eight words: «After investigating, the prosecutor concluded that defendant violated the law» (10 words).

For example, instead of writing «Plaintiffs allege that defendant breached the contract,» or «The judge found that defendant violated the statute,» lawyers will bury the verbs allege and violated in abstract - noun phrases: «Plaintiffs make the allegation that defendant breached the contract,» and «The judge found that defendant was in violation of the statute.»

But, if the defendant violates the supervision, the judge can find the defendant guilty and sentence him accordingly — a conviction.

There must be proof that defendant violated some legal duty to plaintiff, so that plaintiff is in fact the victim and not just the jilted party.

The court ultimately decided the case in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the «garden variety» accident giving rise to the case didn't involve any allegations that the defendant violated any professional duty.

In order to establish such negligence by the park or its employees, your attorney will need to show that the defendant violated its duty of care by failing to ensure that the grounds were free of unsafe conditions.

Only when a lawyer can determine that the defendant violated his or her duty to promote safety and maintain safe premises can you have the opportunity to be successful in your premises liability claim.

To establish liability on the part of any entity or individual, the plaintiff will be required to show that the defendant violated a duty of care owed to the plaintiff by failing to properly inspect and maintain equipment, for instance, or by failing to ensure that a child was safely strapped into a ride.

One of the most effective ways to determine whether the defendant violated any traffic laws is to obtain a copy of a police report prepared after the accident.

Officers will also indicate whether they issued a traffic ticket to one of the drivers, indicating a defendant violated a law and so is at least partly responsible for the crash.

A panel of citizens who hear evidence collected by the prosecutor or his or her agent and then decide whether the evidence is sufficient to believe that a defendant violated a certain law and that the defendant should be formally charged.

Negligence per se applies when a defendant violates a law designed to protect a class of which the plaintiff is a member, the violation causes an accident, and the law was designed to prevent the type of harm that results.

The plaintiff, represented by James Hanson of Hanson Wirsig Matheos, claims the defendant violated the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act (BPCPA) by representations that were false, giving a claim under s. 29 of the CPA.

If the defendant violates the terms or conditions of the deferred adjudication, the probation can be revokes and if that happens, then the conviction does appear on the defendant's driving record or criminal record.

Not exact matches

The defendant, Miguel Games - Perez, was prosecuted for «knowingly violating» a statute prohibiting a convicted felon from possessing a firearm in interstate commerce.

Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company conspired with other dental supply companies to violate federal antitrust laws; (ii) discovery of the foregoing conduct would subject the Company to heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential criminal sanctions; and (iii) that as a result of the foregoing, Henry Schein's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Judge William Pauley on Tuesday ruled that defendant Raymond Lambis» rights were violated when DEA agents used a Stingray without a warrant to locate and search his Washington Heights apartment in Manhattan during a drug - trafficking investigation.

Similar to the Coinflip settlement, under the Tera settlement, the defendants agreed to cease and desist from violating the CEA and CFTC regulations.

5 Under the terms of settlement, the defendants agreed to cease and desist from violating the CEA and CFTC regulations, however, no financial penalty was imposed.

Their lawyers also said Mr Avakian and the state Bureau of Labor and Industries violated the Kleins» rights as artists to free speech, their rights to religious freedom and their rights as defendants to a due process.

The plaintiff claimed that labeling on defendant Bumble Bee's products claiming that the products were an «Excellent Source [of] Omega - 3» violated the FDA's regulations.

He is the only defendant who the judge found could have possibly violated common law fraud, which carries the extra legal burden of having to intent to deceive.

These trials not only violate defendants» rights, but also rob victims of their day in court.

c. General damages against defendant for violating the sexual right of plaintiff by sexually abusing her without her consent.