Sentences with phrase «defending against infringement»

She supports the idea that implementers of standards, like Apple in this case, should have the right to defend themselves against infringement allegations before agreeing to pay up for a license, and sees no reason «why a party's pre-litigation conduct in license negotiations should affect the availability of injunctive relief».

Also in the last couple of years, Justice Mosley, in NOV Downhole Eurasia Limited v. TLL Oil Field Consulting, 2014 FC 889, considered whether a pleading ought to be struck that referred to the file history to defend against infringement arguing that a feature added during prosecution and appearing in each of the claims did not exist in their device.

Compared to anticipation, invalidity and inutility, insufficiency of disclosure has rarely been asserted successfully to invalidate patents or defend against infringement.

Not exact matches

our inability to adequately enforce and protect our intellectual property or defend against assertions of infringement could prevent or restrict our ability to compete;

You agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Franklin Templeton, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and each of its and their officers, directors, employees and agents, from and against all claims, demands, liabilities, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, arising out of or related to (i) your improper access to or use of this Site, (ii) any violation by you of these Terms of Use, (iii) any User Content that you Submit to or via the Site or (iv) any actual or alleged infringement or violation by you of the intellectual property or other proprietary right of any third party.

I fully indemnify, defend and hold harmless Car Throttle (and any third parties authorised by Car Throttle using or exploiting the Content), their respective officers, employees, successors, licensees and permitted assigns from and against: (a) any costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or expense arising from actions brought by any third parties arising from any breach of any of the representations, warranties or agreements made by you; (b) any claims of or respecting slander, libel, defamation, invasion of privacy or right of publicity, false light, infringement of copyright or trademark, or violations of any other rights arising out of or relating to any use of the Content as authorised herein.

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Action Network Group and its affiliates and their officers, directors, employees, consultants, agents, licensors, and suppliers from and against any and all claims, losses, expenses, liabilities, settlements, litigation, damages, and / or costs (including, but not limited to, fees, costs and other expenses of attorneys and expert witnesses) arising out of or related to: (i) your use of the Site, including, but not limited to, any Materials or User Content, (ii) any violation of these Terms of Use or applicable law by you in connection with your use of the Site, including, but not limited to, any Materials or User Content, (iii) any actual or alleged infringement by you, or any person accessing the Site, including, but not limited to, any Materials or User Content, using your password or account identifier, of any intellectual property or privacy or other right of any third party, or (iv) any unauthorized use of password protected Materials or User Content utilizing your account information, whether or not known or authorized by you.

Indemnification: You agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Fertility Center of Las Vegas, its officers, directors, employees, agents, information providers, partners, advertisers and suppliers from and against all losses, expenses, damages and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting from any violation of this Agreement or any activity related to your account (including infringement of third parties» worldwide intellectual property rights or negligent or wrongful conduct) by you or any other person at your direction accessing Fertility Center of Las Vegas» web site.

What would be interesting about filing a copyright infringement against Shire City would be that every argument they used to defend their use would be an argument against their own claim to trademark validity.

Whether one is for or against present copyright laws, the legal reality is the costs of bringing an infringement suit for an indie author is prohibitive, and certainly not practical.I defended one against a visual artist that was definitely ripped off by my little darlings, along with four other defendants.The end result?

You shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Tiny House Design & Living LLC from and against any suit, proceeding, claims, liability, loss, damage, costs or expense, which Tiny House Design & Living LLC may incur, suffer, or be required to pay arising out of such infringement or suspected infringement of any third party's right.

If the content of your entry is claimed to constitute infringement of any proprietary or intellectual proprietary rights of any third party, You shall, at your sole expense, defend or settle against such claims.

Defending MasterCard International in two cases against claim of infringement of patent relating to use of a smart card in a system for automatic connection to a network.

«One of my more memorable cases was defending multiple television networks and a former television executive against claims of copyright infringement related to a popular reality television show.

Our specialties include enforcing IP rights, registering copyrights and trademarks, protecting mobile apps from cloning, drafting licensing agreements, defending companies against IP infringement, and litigating lawsuits in state and federal court.

TMC Fuel Injection System, LLC v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 2 -12-cv-04971 (E.D. Pennsylvania 2012)-- Successfully defended Ford in a patent infringement action involving a patent asserted against the fuel system used in Ford's F - 150 pickup truck and other vehicles.

Eagle Harbor Holdings / Medius v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 3:11 - cv -05503-BHS (W.D. Washington 2015)-- Successfully defended Ford in patent infringement trial in which plaintiff asserted several patents against Ford's SYNC infotainment system and» automatic parking system.

Successfully defended executive in Chinese company against accusation of multiple violations of criminal trademark infringement

Google's answer to Bedrock's third amended complaint was submitted on February 10, 2011 by the Texas - based firm of Potter Minton and the top - notch global firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, which also defends certain Android device makers (such as Motorola and HTC) against Android - related patent infringement allegations.

He handles copyright, trademark, right of publicity, false advertising, trade secret and patent disputes, protecting valuable intellectual property rights from would - be infringers and defending clients against wrongful accusations of infringement.

We defended Karsten Manufacturing against patent infringement allegations relating to golf clubs.

Defended 3D Systems in a patent infringement suit brought by EOS, a licensee of 3D, against DTM Corporation, a corporation 3D acquired after EOS brought suit, and one of DTM's customers.

We defended Karsten Manufacturing against patent infringement allegations in the Northern District of Illinois relating to certain of its PING brand golf clubs.

Represented leading footwear company in defending against federal trademark, trade dress, and design patent infringement claims brought by competing footwear manufacturer.

On numerous occasions, our lawyers have pursued emergency relief in federal and state courts to protect against the loss or infringement of IP rights and trade secrets, including obtaining and defending against temporary restraining orders and preliminary and permanent injunctions.

(won patent infringement judgment involving virtual storage systems and successfully defended against antitrust claims) Waner v. Ford Motor Co. (defended patent infringement case involving heavy - duty trucks) Palmer v. Fox Software (successfully defended breach of fiduciary duty claims) Expeditors v. Vastera (successfully defended trade secret claim involving import / export regulations and logistics)

The Court's opinion in SCA Hygiene did note that an accused infringer can still defend against a claim of infringement based on the defense of equitable estoppel.

Advising and representing a global technology company in a number of patent litigations, including defending it against standard - essential patent assertions and against the largest ever damages claim brought in patent infringement proceedings in Germany.

Part of team defending client in Ohio federal court against claims seeking hundreds of millions of dollars for patent infringement.

Acted for a national transport related business in defending it against a patent infringement claim

Successfully defended leading seller of home fitness equipment against patent infringement and state law claims relating its distribution of popular fitness equipment in which district court granted summary judgment and Federal Circuit affirmed.

Olympic Airways, the Hellenic Ministry of Transport and the Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority in defending Olympic's ground handling monopoly against Article 102 complaints made by various European airlines as well as Article 106 infringement proceedings brought by the European Commission against the Greek government.

We are counsel to some of the largest corporations in the U.S. in defending against claims of copyright infringement.

At Gorodissky & Partners, notable work included representing Russian confectioner Chocolate Toy in a copyright infringement dispute; defending Decor Rus against an infringement action brought by a competitor; and representing Perfetti Van Melle in a trade mark infringement case filed by New Technologies regarding its «FOOTBALL» mark.

Counsel for hair care company defending against trademark infringement allegations brought by a competitor in multiple jurisdictions worldwide.

IPR means inter-partes review and CBM means covered business methods, i.e., a category of subject matter with respect to which a challenge before the USPTO can be particularly effective when defending against patent infringement lawsuits.

«My company, Capstone Photography, was sued for the infringement of three vague and overly broad patents relating to how event photos are posted online for searching, viewing and purchase... Our small business, without even a single line item in our budget for legal defense, spent $ 100,000 to defend against the suit.»

For example, the Innovation Act included provisions that would allow a manufacturer to step into the shoes of its customer and defend its products against claims of infringement.

From defending against antitrust claims and overturning burdensome local ordinances to stopping online copyright infringement of MLS listing data, associations seek NAR funding for roughly a half - dozen cases a year.