Sentences with phrase «defending themselves against claims involves»

Our clients retain us to defend them against claims involving: premises liability, construction accidents, truck and automobile accidents, wrongful death, pharmacy misfills, fraud and misrepresentation, assault and battery, false imprisonment, defamation, negligent hiring and supervision, negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, among others.

Not exact matches

If you are involved in an incident causing injury or property damage that was (or is alleged to have been) your fault your insurance cover may indemnify you in respect of the legal costs of defending a third party claim and any resulting damages awarded against you.

CMSA is perhaps best known for having fired a pregnant teacher in 2010 who was involved in organizing a union at the school, then defending itself against a labor relations board action by claiming it was a private, not a public school.

Successfully defended a Vermont town and its police department in the United States District Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals against a claim of unconstitutional policies and practices, training, supervision and hiring in connection with an officer - involved shooting

Drawing on his experience working with experts in a broad range of technical fields, Mr. Fatheree's background allows him to simplify sophisticated issues quickly and defend his clients against damage claims involving complex theories.

First - chair trial experience defending global chemical manufacturer against breach of contract, Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and product defect claims involving automotive industrial coatings product

Mr. Durham recently defended a case involving a multi-week trial with claims totaling 45 million dollars, with no damages assessed against his client.

Our health care litigators have defended clients against governmental claims and investigations involving patient care issues, including «quality of care,» medical necessity and EMTALA cases, and assisted clients in resolving such matters with the U.S. Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General and state Medicaid Fraud Control Units.

The governmental liability lawyers at our firm are also actively involved in counseling and representing clients in a wide range of land use matters, including defending against claims of inverse condemnation, zoning violations and sovereign immunity.

We defended a major manufacturer of aircraft engines and component parts against a personal injury claim involving the separation of a magneto from a Piper Lance II aircraft after take - off.

We have defended the world's leading deicing equipment manufacturer against multiple claims arising from fatal crashes of cargo and private flights involving deicing equipment installed on Cessna 208B Caravan aircraft.

We defended a general aviation aircraft manufacturer against a claim involving engine fire damage.

Defended Big Four accounting firm against claims involving computer tampering and theft of trade secrets.

Our attorneys have successfully defended against general liability and casualty claims involving a wide range of businesses, organizations and individuals, including:

«Will Potts has demonstrable experience defending against industrial disease claims, including cases involving asbestos - related diseases such as mesothelioma.»

Marrero & Wydler Attorneys at Law are very busy defending commercial clients, government agencies and others against claims of negligence involved in vehicle accidents.

Defended multinational bank against securities fraud claim in case in which the court denied class action certification in decision involving the efficient market hypothesis and fraud on the market theory.

Our litigators are well prepared to protect the rights of our clients, whether it involves defending a claim against a client or prosecuting a claim on behalf of a client.

Defended a domestic automobile manufacturer in dozens of actions in Ohio against personal injury and fire damage claims involving allegations of airbag non-deployment, seatbelt failure, brake failure, wheel - off, transmission explosion, car jack collapse, wiring failures, and other alleged design, manufacturing, and warning defects.

Successfully defended and obtained dismissal of all claims against a Fortune 500 telecommunication company and a supervisor involving battery and vicarious liability claims.

Successfully defended and dismissed all claims against a Fortune 500 retailer involving disability and pregnancy discrimination claims before the U.S. District Court, Court of Appeals, and U.S. Supreme Court (petition for writ).

David is currently heavily involved defending a variety of fraud and dishonest assistance claims arising from the sale of carbon credits, both in the Financial List (against Citi Bank) and in the tax tribunal (RBS and Citi Bank).

William M. Connolly defends companies in complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country, with an emphasis on consumer class actions, claims against professional service firms, and commercial litigation involving issues of business valuation or complex economic damages.

This depth of experience and multi-disciplinary approach positions our firm to successfully counsel and defend against all types of claims and disputes involving members of the hospitality industry.

(won patent infringement judgment involving virtual storage systems and successfully defended against antitrust claims) Waner v. Ford Motor Co. (defended patent infringement case involving heavy - duty trucks) Palmer v. Fox Software (successfully defended breach of fiduciary duty claims) Expeditors v. Vastera (successfully defended trade secret claim involving import / export regulations and logistics)

He has been involved in many seminal IP cases, including one before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the scope of protection for product trade dress, and has served as lead counsel for clients that are both asserting and defending against IP claims.

Raymond defends clients against claims involving construction, product liability, toxic tort, environmental law, breach of contract, subrogation, and general liability.

But one of its most most headline - grabbing recent trials has involved defending Tishman Construction against a claim that threatened nine - figure damages if successful.

Kathy has also defended an international dialysis services provider against RICO claims in federal court based on allegedly fraudulent billing activity, represented a pharmaceutical services provider in a billing dispute with a chain of nursing homes, defended home health agencies in suits brought by employees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, and represented other providers and associations of providers as plaintiffs and defendants in a variety of matters in federal and state court involving issues ranging from contract interpretation to cash receipts assessments to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Our approach is as commercial as it is legal, looking to balance the potential recoveries against the costs and risks involved in pursuing or defending a claim.

Zelle's financial services team recently successfully defended a class action brought against a large bank involving claims of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and violations of a state consumer protection statute.

THIRD PARTY DISPUTES (SELLER»S DUTY TO DEFEND): In the event of an arbitration claim or lawsuit arising out of alleged actions or omissions of Seller against or in any way involving Broker that seeks payment of a commission or money damages in connection with the sale or attempted sale of the Property, Seller agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Broker harmless from, and provide a full defense and aid to Broker with respect to any such claim or lawsuit («Duty to Defend&raDEFEND): In the event of an arbitration claim or lawsuit arising out of alleged actions or omissions of Seller against or in any way involving Broker that seeks payment of a commission or money damages in connection with the sale or attempted sale of the Property, Seller agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Broker harmless from, and provide a full defense and aid to Broker with respect to any such claim or lawsuit («Duty to Defend&raDEFEND): In the event of an arbitration claim or lawsuit arising out of alleged actions or omissions of Seller against or in any way involving Broker that seeks payment of a commission or money damages in connection with the sale or attempted sale of the Property, Seller agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Broker harmless from, and provide a full defense and aid to Broker with respect to any such claim or lawsuit («Duty to Defend&radefend, and hold Broker harmless from, and provide a full defense and aid to Broker with respect to any such claim or lawsuit («Duty to Defend&radefend, and hold Broker harmless from, and provide a full defense and aid to Broker with respect to any such claim or lawsuit («Duty to Defend&raDefend&raDefend»).