It also
defends you against a suit for something the policy would cover, so you're even more protected.
Your policy also pays to
defend you against suits for which the policy would pay if you were proven to be responsible.
Defense costs can be staggering, so this benefits both you and the insurer — you're not worried about burning through your policy limits with the cost of a lawyer and the insurer is able to continue to
defend against a suit for which they may be responsible even if they spend more than the policy limits to do so.
Defending yourself against a suit for your negligence that caused bodily injury or property damage is very, very expensive.
Your policy also pays to
defend you against suits for which the policy would pay if you were proven to be responsible.
Defending yourself against a suit for your negligence that caused bodily injury or property damage is very, very expensive.
Defense costs can be staggering, so this benefits both you and the insurer — you're not worried about burning through your policy limits with the cost of a lawyer and the insurer is able to continue to
defend against a suit for which they may be responsible even if they spend more than the policy limits to do so.
Not exact matches
Arsene playing a balanced team will give you positive results, especially playing
against a big team, over the past years we have continued to use players not
suited for certain positions, we actually had a player who used left foot on the left side of the field who got in attacking position, Kolasinac to me was the most important player going forward and
defending.
Senator Isah Misau representing Bauchi Central Senatorial Zone, has said he was ready to appear in court to
defend himself following the
suit filed
against him
for allegedly making «injurious falsehood»
against the Inspector General of Police, IGP, Mr. Ibrahim Idris and the Nigerian Police Force.
And thirdly, they
defend choice
against the entreaties of traditionalists such as the Florida Education Association, the affiliate of both the National Education Association affiliates and the American Federation of Teachers that just filed
suit this week
against the Sunshine State's expansion of vouchers
for kids trapped in special ed ghettos.
Whether one is
for or
against present copyright laws, the legal reality is the costs of bringing an infringement
suit for an indie author is prohibitive, and certainly not practical.I
defended one
against a visual artist that was definitely ripped off by my little darlings, along with four other defendants.The end result?
It also covers the cost of
defending against that claim or
suit for which the policy would pay, if proven.
Wherever you go, if you negligently cause bodily injury or property damage to someone else, you have coverage
for the damages as well as
for the cost of
defending against the claim or
suit.
It means that if you are sued
for those things that the policy would cover you, they will select an attorney or attorneys and they will pay out of their own pocket to
defend against the claim or
suit.
That coverage would pay the claim if it were proven to be your fault and a result of your negligence, but it also pays to
defend you in the event that a claim is made or a
suit is brought
against you
for those injuries.
Your Woodlake Apartments renters insurance would pay to
defend against a
suit, frivolous or otherwise, as well as pay
for the judgement.
However, there are some
suits that renters insurance will not
defend against or pay
for related claims.
If you're sued
for bodily injury or property damage, the policy can
defend you
against that
suit.
Now, you might think it's worth getting sued over that particular issue because it's very important to you, but that doesn't change the fact that it will cost you a great deal of money to
defend against the
suit and it will also cost you a great deal of money to pay
for the loss if your negligence is found to be the cause.
In other words, they pay
for a lawyer to
defend you
against the subrogation
suit if you're the one responsible
for the fire.
Medical bills and the cost of
defending against a
suit like that from a health insurer or an uninsured guest can be astronomical, and the policy can cover these losses so that you don't have to start your marriage out deeply in debt by paying
for someone else's drunken broken bone.
Renters insurance
defends you
against the
suit and can pay
for the damage.
You'd have to pay to
defend against the
suit, and you'd also have to pay
for the claim if it was proven.
Fortunately, your renters insurance policy will
defend you
against a
suit that would result in the policy paying
for the loss.
Fortunately, your San Jose Renters Insurance pays
for the cost of
defending you
against a claim or
suit that the policy would pay
for.
The Meadows renters insurance will pay to
defend you
against a claim or
suit for something the policy would cover.
First of all, it will pay to
defend you
against a
suit or claim
for bodily injury or property damage which would be covered under the policy.
If someone alleges that you caused them bodily injury or property damage,
defending against that
suit is crucial — especially if you're not responsible
for the loss, but even if you are.
The insurance company would pay
for a lawyer to
defend you
against that claim or
suit.
The cardholder agrees that s / he will
defend and indemnify the Priority Pass group of companies, its directors, officers, employees and agents (collectively «the indemnified parties»)
against and hold each indemnified party harmless from all liabilities, damages, losses, claims,
suits, judgments, costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees)
for injury to or death of any person or damage to, or destruction of, any property arising from the use of any lounge by the cardholder or any other person accompanying the cardholder, except that such indemnification shall not extend to acts of gross negligence or wilful misconduct by the indemnified parties.
For New Jersey users, you would not be required to
defend, indemnify or hold harmless Michaels and its respective employees, directors, officers, agents, vendors and suppliers from and
against any liabilities, losses, investigations, inquiries, claims,
suits, damages, costs or expenses arising out of Michaels own negligence.
That in turn has prompted a slew of news stories on the case, the general gist of which you can get from the headlines: Media and rights organizations
defend National Review, et al.
against Michael Mann (The Washington Post) Climate scientist faces broad array of foes in
suit vs. National Review (Reuters) Groups rally around think tank, publication being sued
for global warming views (Fox News)... and of course:...
National Review is asking
for money to
defend itself
against a libel law
suit filed by Professor Michael Mann
for defaming him by accusing him of academic fraud.
And Ambrogi has your first case: «
Defending Stick Figure in a bias
suit for discriminating
against older lawyers...»
First case:
Defending Stick Figure in a bias
suit for discriminating
against older lawyers.
Defending a Virginia county
against suit filed by town
for breach of public utility agreements
Among other areas, our litigation experience in the environmental area includes governmental and private - party actions under CERCLA (including serving as lead counsel
for PRP groups at major Superfund sites throughout the United States), citizen
suits under RCRA, the Clean Water Act and other environmental laws, claims
for property damage and personal injury arising from industrial emissions or environmental contamination, and
defending clients
against state and federal governmental enforcement actions.
Defended numerous
suits against manufacturers
for personal injury and wrongful death, including matters
for vehicle, tire, equipment, sporting goods, asbestos and tobacco manufacturers.
The FTCA does not bar
suits for breach of contract, does not bar
suits for injunctive or declaratory relief, and does not bar
suits against government employees
for money damages
for intentionally violating someone's civil rights (even though some union contract indemnify and
defend government employees
for civil rights violations, in practice, converting tort liability of an individual into contractual liability of the United States government).
For example, the United States Department of Justice is required by law to
defend tort
suits brought
against certain covered entities; in such circumstances, however, the United States, and not the individual covered entity, is the client and is potentially liable.
In addition, you'll have coverage
for the costs of
defending against the
suit or claim that results from it.
They can't reasonably be expected to
defend you
against a
suit that they're not aware of, of course, nor to reimburse you
for money you spent on a defense that they weren't aware was necessary or which might have been conducted with a different attorney or in a different way.
If someone alleges that you caused them bodily injury or property damage,
defending against that
suit is crucial — especially if you're not responsible
for the loss, but even if you are.
Renters insurance
defends you
against the
suit and can pay
for the damage.
Some states, such as Virginia, require that the victim actually obtain a judgment
against the uninsured motorist (while serving the uninsured motorist carrier in the lawsuit so that the carrier can
defend the
suit) and then demand payment from the uninsured motorist carrier prior to suing the carrier
for any breach of an uninsured motorist provision.
If you cause the loss, you're responsible to
defend yourself
against the claim or
suit as well as to pay
for it.
Liability coverage on Washington Renters Insurance also pays
for the costs of
defending you
against the claim or
suit that's brought
against you
for that loss.
Your policy also provides
for defense costs, generally outside the policy limits, to ensure that you're
defended against that claim or
suit.
Liability coverage can pay
for the injuries, as well as paying the legal expenses that come with
defending against that claim or
suit.
La Jolla Canyon renters insurance
defends you
against suits or claims that the policy would pay
for if proven, so you're covered in unexpected ways.