Sentences with phrase «defense costs when»

Acuity's business liability insurance protects you when someone takes legal action against you, including your defense costs when a customer slips on a wet floor or falls on incorrectly installed stairs.

Not exact matches

When people feel that a group they value — be it racial, religious, regional or ideological — is under attack, they rally to its defense, even at some cost to themselves.
BFG has not been up to it so far this season, addition to our defense was promised in the summer but not delivered, according to Wenger «He looked but none was available», fast forward to AGM and Wenger says «we will purchase a defender in January», well if we couldn't find a defender in the summer will that defender miraculously become available in January when 1) his cost will be twice as expensive 2) could be cup tied and 3) with clubs fighting relegation or fighting for the title.
The governor also needs to be mindful of the costs for local governments, who are growing increasingly vocal about mandate relief, including when it comes to indigent defense and Medicaid.
There's no reason for that money to come out of your bank account when Bridgeport Coast renters insurance would cover the claim as well as defense costs of the claim.
Your policy provides defense for claims that would be covered if proven, so those costs are not on you when you're covered.
First, when the claim is made, your policy pays for your defense costs.
A broken bone and the resulting lawsuit would ultimately cost hundreds of thousands of dollars when you include defense costs.
You can think of the index mutual fund «broker penalty» this way: If a consumer spends $ 4 for a loaf of bread when an identical loaf on the same shelf cost $ 2, it is no defense for a «bread broker» who recommends the $ 4 loaf to argue that it cost more because the baker has higher production costs than the baker of the $ 2 loaf.
How does one perform the calculus necessary to remain silent when confronted with a significant lapse that costs nothing to mention, where that mention would be in defense of AGU's principles?
When a company has an obligation to an executive's defense costs in a criminal proceeding arising out of his employment, how much is it required to pay?
A Rule 68 offer is a cost - flipping mechanism, often used by defense attorneys when they are making what they believe is a fair offer (very rarely is the offer one that is equal to the Plaintiff's demand, which is why this issue rarely arises).
Many times mediation or arbitration is most effective when there is a lawsuit on file, and the insurance company wants to settle without incurring more costs and defense attorney fees.
On appeal, the First Circuit certified three questions to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: (1) whether an insurer owes a duty under an insurance policy or the Massachusetts «in for one, in for all» rule to prosecute an insured's counterclaim; (2) whether an insurer owes a duty to fund the prosecution of an insured's counterclaim as part of «Defense Costs;» and (3) when such a duty might give rise to a conflict of interest, so that the insured is entitled to separate counsel at the insurer's expense.
In a demonstration of the judicial flexibility that exists under the BC Supreme Court Rules when assessing costs consequences following trials with formal offers in place, reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, awarding a Plaintiff full costs despite failing to beat a Defense formal settlement offer.
A broken bone and the resulting lawsuit would ultimately cost hundreds of thousands of dollars when you include defense costs.
In most cases, liability insurance also includes the legal costs of defense when there is a lawsuit involved.
There's no reason for that money to come out of your bank account when Bridgeport Coast renters insurance would cover the claim as well as defense costs of the claim.
Your policy provides defense for claims that would be covered if proven, so those costs are not on you when you're covered.
Active duty personnel, veterans and retired members of the military, as well as employees of the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security, qualify for a grant up to $ 5,000 to use on down payments and closing costs when buying their first home.
When institutions become so big that they communally think that they can not fail, they automatically go into brand - defense mode whereby the brand (and their jobs therein) is / are what must be saved at all costs, at the expense of those for whom they claim to exist... the expendables... the grunts.
Active duty personnel, veterans, retired members of the military, and employees of the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security may be eligible for a grant up to $ 5,000 to use on down payments and closing costs when buying their first home.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z