The WTO allows a national security exemption from its rules, but it has never been used as
a defense in a trade dispute.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations
in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand
in construction and
in both the commercial and
defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges
in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including
in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption
in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor
disputes; (15) the effect of changes
in political conditions
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes
in U.S.
trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global
trade policies and currency exchange rates
in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes
in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result
in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including
in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted
in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is
in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued
in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
His practice covers a range of litigation, including commercial, class action
defense, product liability, mass tort, environmental,
trade secret, insurance coverage, and real property title
disputes in state and federal courts.
During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases
in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract
disputes, civil RICO, ERISA,
trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance
disputes, minority shareholder
disputes, partnership
disputes, Madoff counseling and
defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.
Dan's business litigation included defending a truck manufacturer
in suits by disgruntled dealers, the
defense of numerous officers and directors of failed savings and loans, a recovery for limited partners
in a franchise who were misled by a franchisor,
defense of libel actions,
trade secret litigation on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants, lease covenant
disputes for commercial tenants of shopping centers, and business partnership
disputes.
In addition to administering the award - winning Fair Competition Law blog, Russell writes, lectures, and is quoted or cited in connection with various intellectual property and other legal issues, including enforcement and defense of noncompete agreements, protection of trade secrets, trademark disputes, copyright issues, arbitration, mediation, and binding mediatio
In addition to administering the award - winning Fair Competition Law blog, Russell writes, lectures, and is quoted or cited
in connection with various intellectual property and other legal issues, including enforcement and defense of noncompete agreements, protection of trade secrets, trademark disputes, copyright issues, arbitration, mediation, and binding mediatio
in connection with various intellectual property and other legal issues, including enforcement and
defense of noncompete agreements, protection of
trade secrets, trademark
disputes, copyright issues, arbitration, mediation, and binding mediation.
J. Christopher Fox, II (Business Litigation)-- Fox is a partner whose practice encompasses a broad range of commercial
disputes, including contractual issues arising
in the financial services arena, matters relating to restrictive covenants and unfair competition claims, and litigation of patent and trademark infringement claims, as well as
defense and prosecution of claims for misappropriation of
trade secrets.
Mr. Hensley's litigation experience is broad
in nature, encompassing such diverse practice areas as: real estate issues of almost any nature; construction defect litigation (both plaintiff and
defense, representing developers, contractors, managers, subcontractors, and design professionals); federal and state securities class action / derivative
defense; partnership / corporate governance issues; UCC / commercial paper / letter of credit issues; intellectual property /
trade secret / unfair competition issues; wrongful termination / harassment trials; wage / hour class action
defense; contract formation and interpretation issues; bankruptcy adversary proceedings; health care
disputes; telecommunications issues; and debtor / creditor financing issues involving both secured and unsecured interests.
Additionally, recognizing that a cyber - or privacy - related development can expand to encompass a number of other significant legal issues, our group works hand -
in - glove with attorneys
in our White Collar
Defense, Regulatory and Investigations, Securities Litigation, Complex Commercial Litigation, Business Finance & Restructuring and Employment Litigation practices, among others, to address subsequent risks such as government or regulatory inquiries, shareholder, consumer, or employee class action litigation,
trade secrets theft, funding or financial issues, and
disputes with vendors, service providers and other third parties.
In particular, he appears regularly in the Delaware Chancery Court and the Delaware Supreme Court in connection with M&A transactions and shareholder disputes, including of late, the successful defense of Kinder Morgan's $ 80 billion corporate reorganization of three publicly traded entities, Signet's acquisition of Zale, and many other transaction
In particular, he appears regularly
in the Delaware Chancery Court and the Delaware Supreme Court in connection with M&A transactions and shareholder disputes, including of late, the successful defense of Kinder Morgan's $ 80 billion corporate reorganization of three publicly traded entities, Signet's acquisition of Zale, and many other transaction
in the Delaware Chancery Court and the Delaware Supreme Court
in connection with M&A transactions and shareholder disputes, including of late, the successful defense of Kinder Morgan's $ 80 billion corporate reorganization of three publicly traded entities, Signet's acquisition of Zale, and many other transaction
in connection with M&A transactions and shareholder
disputes, including of late, the successful
defense of Kinder Morgan's $ 80 billion corporate reorganization of three publicly
traded entities, Signet's acquisition of Zale, and many other transactions.