Sentences with phrase «defense midfield and attack»

United City and Chelsea look better than us in defense midfield and attack.

We leaked a lot of goals 45 we lost 11 games and drew 6 that is 17 games down... so we will need to fix the defense the midfield and attack so the minimum required is 4 players preferably 5 that could mount any thing between 150 — 250 million Can a new Manger coup with the same players and achieve better results without investing?

Not exact matches

If we can match there midfield as well as having a good balance between attack and defense, Bellarin is the man.

Unlike Barcelona, we don't have a Messi, Iniesta, Xavi or even Busquet to play «tiki taka», build on fast attacks from the midfield to penetrate the opponents defense and produce a magical moment week in week.

Their defense, midfield and attack are failing cohesively, and the spirit within the camp doesn't seem all that boisterous.

Even with MSN or BBC, if all the rest are Arsenal midfielders, defenders and mr. Cech, the the phrase attack is the best form of defense do not apply there

Both Mkhitaryan and Ozil have the potential to start up attacks from deep in the central defense area and continue those attacks in the pivot attacking midfield set - up as well, and completing the same in advance attacking roles as well as striking positions.

Our defense, midfield must be at their best and let Ozil Lacazette and Sanchez handle goals and attacks.

Liverpool — Henderson — Gerrard Real — Modric — Kroos Don't get me wrong, we absolutely need a pure DM for tough matches — but spending 25M + + for extra depth in that position is really luxury Vidal is a versatile all around central midfielder — If we play 4 -2-3-1, let him pair with either Ramsey / Carzola and we have a very strong midfield base in both attack and defense.

We are looking very thin carzola wont be back elneny is out until at least the end of February we need to bluster our midfield our attacking midfield yes we can shuffle around with elexis and ozil and iwobi but is it the long term answer no I do nt think so as the attacking midfield is the place where most injuries occur along the side of the defense so if any one else gets injured we will very short and in deep trouble maybe after all we should call upon fabergas if no one else is available on a personal preference I would prefer veratie

Any good manager would have a strong midfield in defense and attack allowing players to play in their positions.

Without midfield control there is no link between attack and defense and balance is lost...

Spurs are literally better than us in every area of the team: Defense, midfield and Attack.

I can't remember who it was that made a stupid comment yesterday about how every player should just do what their position says, That a defender should just do that, an attacking midfielder should just create a DM should just cover the defense and strikers and wingers should just put in crosses into the strikers... I think it was Ks - gunner or kickAss, can't remember properly.

Equally specialist and dedicated coaching staff who are allowed to contribute for the better functioning of the team are in place working on areas like defense, midfield and attack.

Wengers should have just added a very good DM and another quicker defender to treat those kind of problems but eish he is too stubborn to drop his new captain or Flamini and he had to change the formation to make sure the midfield players defend and attack in numbers with one DM to always protect the defense but this is not happening and Wenger will not change that until maybe 2 or 3 years because he is not under any pressure to do well after all!

Atletico Madrid and Leicester City use a pacey striker upfront and a hardworking attacking midfielder behind him to disrupt their opponent's defense:

Then for the defense, midfield, and attack, I will run the matrix for each and come up with comprehensive articles (hopefully?)

In the midfield, connecting defense to attack continues to be a problem until the change to a back three and the evolution of the Xhaka / Ramsey pivot.

It is the deeper lying midfield generals who in such a team control transformation from defense — to — attack, and vice versa, making sure shape and sharpness is maintained in attack as well as retreat.

Lack of qualities in some areas especially in defense and attacking minefields, here you may expect me to talk about DM instead of AM but for my quick view our AM with the exceptional of Mesut Ozil tend to dribble too often than looking for a killer pass, people may talk about Sanchez to be there but for me he is a better option among the available midfielders, however the only proper number 10 we have is Mesut Ozil.

They did it with good defense and scoring with quality attacking midfielders.

For Arsenal to climb up the Premier League table, however, they need their defense, midfield and attack functioning better than what it has so far.

our problem is not the defense we cant just score goals with so many attempts we shoudl have scored 4 - 5 goals and win it by 5 - 2 without a creative midfielder like Cazorla or Ramsey (when he plays well) our attacking play is very predictable maybe playing Iwobi instead of Elneny or Coq is at least better But Wenger's biggest mistake was to play Chambers instead of Bellerin Bellerin with his pace opens up the opponents.

Flamini does nt have the ability to bring d ball out from defense to attack, he cant dictate the play nor launch attack from his position which is bad especially when you compare him to the way modern defensive midfielders plays this days... Things has evolved, good and modern coaches now prefers to have ball playing and technical defenders, we have that in koscieny and Gabriel, also our full backs are excellent with the ball, but Flamini is not, you can see all see how we kept on loosing possession against Liverpool.

Wenger needs to either strengthen our attack or defense hopefully both, but atleast one, at the moment we resemble a model with a shit ass, crumply legs and a terrible face but with a great pair of boobs (reference to our great creative midfield) COYG

@fred, Ramsey is a B2B midfielder, so he is like a player providing balance to defense and attack.

Outscoring out opponent while keeping shape, disciplined defense, solid midfield and lethal attacking will win us this game.

compared to the Chelsea defense, Liverpool attack and man utd midfield..

In fact I said I am happy he is with us because he is excellent in both attack and defense and completes central midfield.

Our play has been so poor in midfield, constantly losing balls, slow passing sideway, passing undetectable in defense and attack.

He was seen as a joke when Moyes brought him in but he is a very good midfielder in both defense and attack

City had a weakened defense but employed a top - notch attacking force and they were not able to break down Arsenal — partly because Arsenal controlled the midfield quite well.

While he's not quite as prolific as the Uruguayan — Suárez is, effectively, a world class attacking midfielder and a world class striker at the same time — they both share a ludicrous, defense - spooking dynamism that energizes the team around them.

ramsey is a good payer when he decides to remain disciplined less greedy and focus more on creating chances and filling our midfield with his presence and providing eergy for both attacks and defense, remember he is a complete midfielder.

If we have good memories xhaka played well in his first nld derby because he played as a cm and not a dm.he can not protect the defense but he has good attacking qualities of passing and shooting which he is among the best in the world in doing.He will also addd stee to our midfield and deal with the aerial balls.

The defense freezes, the midfield dissolves, and the attack all stand around staring at one another with murderous faces.

It's not that Coq is so great: it's that he's just technical enough to fit into the midfield without hurting the attack, while being both focused primarily on defense and good enough to give us league - average play at it.

Moreover in order for you to do it successfully you HAVE to have a very strong back line that link well with the midfield or a midfielder who is willing to be the link between the defense and the attack.

Boss can Marshall the defense Xhaka will control the midfield and attack is possible from all the sides.

He may not be a DM but is a good tackler, gets back possession of the ball, so an excellent all around midfielder on both attack and defense

Santi, Santiago, little magician, call the man whatever you want, but the point is that he is the most important piece in our formation, take him out and the team lacks that link which connects defense - midfield - attack.

The attack has been substantially addressed (a specialist winger / wide attacker would be nice), now attention has to be directed at the midfield and defense.

What I also noticed is that the formation provided us with a lot of options in defense, midfield and attack.

The performance wasn't the worst that's for sure though its very clear we do not have a true leader or midfield general in the team who can drag the team forward when needed too, break up our opponents attacks before the ball goes near slow Mert and the defense, and also someone who can buck out instructions to other players.

They also want more intensity in the midfield, depth in the central defense and if possible, another fullback who can provide attack.

Defense, central midfield and attack.

YOU HAVE THE DEFENSE REQUIRED, MIDFIELD AND ATTACK ARE FREE TO OPERATE UP FRONT.

Ensuring defense, midfield and attack are well drilled and function as indicidual units and as a team.

Attacking is good but our midfield would be thin as butter and out defense is in pieces.