Sentences with phrase «defense sides of»

The all - day conference is designed for professionals on the plaintiff and defense sides of data privacy and security disputes.

Ben is a smart, aggressive, and creative lawyer with broad experience on both the plaintiff and defense sides of the docket.

The story noted that Vance's former employer, Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello PC, was one of the firms involved on the defense side of the potential case, which revolved around allegations that investors were misled about the project and its finances.

That's the tower defense side of things.

Represented insurance companies on the defense side of automobile and worker's compensation, construction litigation, mold and asbestos cases.

Attorney Scott D. Frendel's experience on the defense side of workers» compensation enhances his ability to represent injured workers.

After 8 years of working on the defense side of civil cases, David made the decision to switch and help injured victims get the help they need.

On the defense side of our practice, litigation partner Dan Kessler has successfully defended jury trial claims in excess of $ 30 million.

This Legal Secretary MUST have experience with the medical malpractice practice area, digital dictation, electronic filing, and knowledge of the defense side of law.

Not exact matches

While team chemistry seemed to improve, they didn't experience much of an uptick on defense, by far their weakest side of the court.

«Clearly defense and security cooperation is a very important, fundamental aspect of this bilateral partnership and given that the U.K. will be leaving the EU in the future, both sides, I think, are very keen in this summit to underline their continued commitment to defense cooperation,» Shankar added.

«The video conference was the latest in a continuing dialogue with the Russian Defense Ministry under the memorandum of understanding for the safety of flight in Syria,» Cook added, «to ensure that each side continues to adhere to agreed - upon measures to mitigate incidents in the air.»

«The diplomatic portion of the federal budget is very important and you get results a lot cheaper frequently than you do on the defense side,» McConnell told reporters.

On the defense side, there are missions in space that can be achieved by launching several smaller, cheaper satellites instead of one big satellite.

Scalia was known for erring on the side of even the most unpopular suspects (he once referred to himself as «the darling of the criminal defense bar»).

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

On the other side of the coin, Brent Celek and the Browns» defense scored just one point with their combined efforts.

KAI suspects that someone in Israel capitulated to Berlusconi's pressure and ordered the Ministry of Defense to close a deal with Alenia Aermacchi in a side room in exchange for reciprocal procurements of two state - of - the - art IAI AWACS planes based on the G - 550 Gulfstream platform.

People on all sides of the political aisle rightly jumped to Barron's defense.

Both sides of the debate claim Jonah as defense of their views:

On the other side of the aisle, Dov Zakheim, former under secretary of defense and comptroller, is at Talbott's level of policymaking and government service.

It needs to be added that the cultivation of a well - founded fear that the other side might prevail was essential to maintaining popular resolve in the defense of freedom.

I'm not trying to take the side of religion here but in defense of most religious billboards I've seen, they are mostly benign «come to our church» kind of signs.

I would imagine both sides could claim defense of their way of life, both could say they only do what they do to defend themselves from the other and each will claim the other is the bad guy and the way the other fights is cowardly - they use bomber vests, we use unmanned drones - one willing to give their lives the other not.

But in its defense he cited Alasdair MacIntyre's conclusion in After Virtue (University of Notre Dame Press, 1984) that no generally accepted concept of justice is available therefore, «even justice can only be provisional this side of the eschatological fullness of the kingdom of God.»

And yet... «As emergency workers - including personnel from the Red Cross and civil defense corps - responded to the explosion, «angry Christian youth started beating our staff and as a result broke the side glass of our ambulance that was on the scene to provide service,» he said.»

I put Ron Paul to the side because, even if the Republicans do someday nominate a gold standard supporter who wants sharp defense cuts, but it won't be this year, won't be someone who thinks he wants to zero out nuclear weapons production, and military nuclear propulsion production, transportation, and testing, and it won't be a ex-publisher of racist newsletters who can't fully come clean.

(Experts on both sides present sophisticated jurisprudential arguments in defense of their positions, but most people look more to congenial outcomes than to consistent principles of law.)

An appeal to the unchanging teaching of the Church does little justice to the Church Fathers who engaged their whole minds and souls in the defense and articulation of the truth, based on Scripture, reason, liturgy, peculiar strands of philosophy, and sundry other allies they mustered to their side.

Both sides are saying they are blowing up the others out of «self - defense.»

He's proven himself against lesser sides, but getting behind the defense of good teams we shall see.

at this point i would say carvalho and the colombian kid and if latter is too much go for vargas... ozil will add quality but do nt have a starting XI that is top quality yet... on bright side chambers looks like quality sanchez with a bit of tweaking will trouble any defense kos is a top drawer centre back and wilshere is getting back to his best..

No one was driving forward and attacking their defense, which we knew going in was the strongest component of their side.

The team looks very good, light on the defensive side of midfield and a slow with Per in defense but in general if we can avoid injuries, and show that we can compete with the big boys, we can have a good season.

The nature of his tactics also make it that their defense are rarely tested, so they lack practice and experience against good quality attacking sides and dealing with high pressure.

The competing side is only a small part of what we do at MMU Taekwondo, self defense training, fitness and learning the art of Taekwondo take many forms, we have something for everyone.

We are looking very thin carzola wont be back elneny is out until at least the end of February we need to bluster our midfield our attacking midfield yes we can shuffle around with elexis and ozil and iwobi but is it the long term answer no I do nt think so as the attacking midfield is the place where most injuries occur along the side of the defense so if any one else gets injured we will very short and in deep trouble maybe after all we should call upon fabergas if no one else is available on a personal preference I would prefer veratie

The Chargers can not run the ball (problem — entire right side of the offensive line) and can not stop the run on defense.

Their strategy appeared to attack our right side of defense, probably because Hector and Gab were the least experienced.

On the other side Chelsea wanted to attacked the right side of our defense probably for reasons I put forward in the first post.

Houston sports the top defense in the NFL, along with the second - highest scoring offense in the league, presenting an incredibly balanced attack both sides of the football.

Harrison lined up outside the tight end on the defense's right side of the formation, but on the snap he looped inside on a stunt.

Arsenal has always focused on attack more than defense so saying to not forget the attacking side of the game is silly, because we've always been an attacking team.

The formation was strong to Harrison's side, so this time they were trying to run away from him (to the defense's left), but it didn't make a damn bit of difference because he was still going to make a play.

Side note: As if anyone ever needed a reminder as to how utterly uninteresting it is to hear the national media and their superficial analysis of our team, the triumvirate of Pierce, Jalen, and Chauncey discussed this extension and not once was Covington's defense mentioned.

On the very next play, Harrison crashed inside of backup offensive tackle James Hurst, who was lined up as a tight end on the defense's right side, and was able to redirect back outside just enough to get his hands on running back Lorenzo Taliaferro to help get his ass on the ground for no gain as well.

Elsewhere, accounts from players printed later that week indicate that Trice was injured playing defense, that he had «cut back to the right side of the line to check a Gopher line attack» and that on one such play, «he crashed into a fast - charging Gopher forward and fell flat on his back, wincing in pain.»

It was a little adjustment, but I can always control what I do on this side of the floor, which is defense.

They can keep a defense honest and there are definitely wrinkles that can put a defense under a lot of stress, but by the fourth quarter, all 11 guys on the other side are likely still gonna have fresh legs and be full of piss and vinegar.

On the coach side we have a versatile squad so why always play a 4 -2-3-1 formation when we have the players to also play a 4 -2-2-2 or a 4 -3-3 (with 1 player in front of the defense and 2 in more advanced position or the opposite).