On discretionary (appropriated) spending, the budget would adhere to the current
defense spending caps through 2021 and growing with the CBO baseline thereafter.
Not exact matches
While the House recently approved
defense spending of $ 621.5 billion and the Senate approved $ 632 billion for 2018, a 2011 budget law
caps military and
defense spending at $ 549 billion.
The budget would also zero out the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account and
cap exempt nondefense
spending, placing the
defense funds in the base
defense category and eliminating the nondefense OCO funds.
For Immediate Release Senate leaders have agreed to a massive budget deal raising the
defense and nondefense
spending caps for two years, increasing...
After all, what would you rather have: Khalil Mack (eating $ 25 million per year in
cap space) or Myles Garrett, 3 picks in the top 10 this year (all will be immediate impact players filling our holes on offense and
defense of course), AND an extra $ 25 million in available
cap space to
spend on three upper - echelon guys at DT, ILB, and DB.
President Obama's former
defense secretary, Leon Panetta — a
defense - cutting budget hawk when he served in Congress — has called sequestration's
defense -
spending caps «catastrophic,» «a disaster,» and a «a goofy meat - ax approach» that will «hollow out» the military.
To cut a long - term
spending deal, Democrats are pushing for an equivalent increase in both
defense and nondefense funding above the
spending caps set under a 2011 budget agreement - one similar to agreements reached in 2013 and 2015 to raise the
caps for the following two years.
That's because the omnibus sets
defense spending at $ 621.5 billion, approximately $ 72 billion above the
spending caps mandated by the Budget Control Act.
As explained last month, violating the
caps would trigger a sequestration: across - the - board cuts to force
defense spending back down within the
caps.
Congressional
defense hawks initially sought to bulk up the OCO budget as a means to get around the
spending caps.
In contrast, most Democrats and some Republicans want the
caps lifted so they can
spend more on both
defense and civilian programs.
The bipartisan deal raises the
caps on
defense and nondefense discretionary
spending by nearly $ 300 billion overall.
[1] Legislators have also sparred over whether to use war funding to get around the current
spending caps (see the Department of
Defense section below).
In 2018, that
cap is $ 549 billion for discretionary
defense spending, $ 54 billion below Trump's plan.
The assorted cuts described above and below are facilitated by changes to the current discretionary
spending caps, which dictate the size of annual appropriations each year, and which contain nearly all
defense and nondefense science and technology investments.
As I detailed in last year's Climate Shift report, Robertson, who has a net worth of $ 2.2 billion, gave the Environmental
Defense Fund more than $ 40 million between 2005 and 2009 to support the group's efforts to pass
cap and trade legislation, accounting for almost one - third of the $ 144 million that EDF
spent on climate change during the period.
As part of the estimated US$ 45 million buyout, Luminant settled a series of lawsuits with Environmental
Defense and the Natural Resources
Defense Council and agreed to cancel 8 of its planned 11 new Texas coal - fired power plants as well as several new coal - fired plants in Pennsylvania and Virginia, back federal legislation to create a
cap - and - trade system regulating CO2 emissions, and double
spending on energy efficiency.