Sentences with phrase «defense spending if»

You can raise defense spending if you are raising also everything else (and not borrowing), so is, in an economic boom, and even then you're probably being frown upon.

Not exact matches

The bigger impact for Boeing and other companies may come if a Trump Administration clamps down on defense spending.

The RAND report estimated that if transition - related services were extended to active - duty personnel, the military's healthcare costs would increase by between $ 2.4 million and $ 8.4 million a year — at most a 0.13 % increase over the $ 6.2 billion the Defense Department spent on healthcare for active - duty personnel.

When Trump said, «Look, if NATO allies don't want to spend the 2 percent on defense, why should Americans be doing it?»

Defense spending aside, transatlantic rifts could also occur should Trump continue to make critical foreign policy decisions without first consulting allies (as in the April 7 air strike against Syria in response to a chemical - weapons attack) or if he presses NATO allies to make stronger military contributions in Syria or Afghanistan.

Dialogue between Beijing, Tokyo, and Washington can help reduce the risks and costs of ill - advised defense spending, even if such engagement can not bridge differences between these countries» perceived national interests

However, the Senate budget allows the discretionary spending level to be increased if Congress enacts legislation increasing the limit on defense spending without requiring that increase be offset by savings elsewhere in the budget.

«No,» Pompeo replied bluntly when asked if Germany's efforts to increase defense spending have been satisfactory.

If you are 55 or under and hope to enjoy some of those benefits you have been paying into from your paychecks for the last 30 years, of which the Government has borrowed 5 trillion dollars for other spending such as defense and tax breaks for the rich, which is why the current social security system is in jeopardy, then you will be voting for Obama.

Spend some time on this, because as any home defense expert will tell you, you have to be sure you can pull the trigger on another person, otherwise, bad things could happen if you introduce a gun into the situation.

well, if it were up to The right side... we would Stop the drone strikes, put MORE boots on the ground, Increase Defense spending... and rattle some sabers.

If Romney gets elected and he does not touch defense spending and cuts radically in other areas, not good.

I'll go a step further if Van Djik hasn't signed for Liverpool I would try to make a move and here is why: 1) Prem experience 2) Southampton plays a similar style of football than Arsenal 3) He can play in both a 3 and 4 man defense with his ability on the ball 4) Mustafi has been up and down and I don't know which one we're getting ahead of next season and will it be for 38 weeks 5) Mertesacker will go into a non playing role 6) Chambers has played well at Boro but well enough to play a big role into this team... not really and could be used in any deal for Van Djik 7) Koscielny is our best defenders but is dealing with a chronic injury not only that he hasn't made the best decisions at times Everything mentioned above will free wages but also increase Wenger money to spend!

it seems obvious, theo is gone, he is tough on negotiation and demands and soft on delivering value, i like him, but if we sell and spend i am ok, as for danny, i thought he looked great v new castle, he was constantly stretching the defense, his track back was also great, heart and speed are there, takes a wenger to work on making him clinical, thats what arsene does best, teach.

I don't see Wenger spending on defense in January (if he spends anything at all).

I hope Wenger (if he doesn't get fired) thinks before spending big money on defense and midfield.

Liverpool — Henderson — Gerrard Real — Modric — Kroos Don't get me wrong, we absolutely need a pure DM for tough matches — but spending 25M + + for extra depth in that position is really luxury Vidal is a versatile all around central midfielder — If we play 4 -2-3-1, let him pair with either Ramsey / Carzola and we have a very strong midfield base in both attack and defense.

If they want to spend a couple of years building up the defense, then go the other way.

think of Messi, Ronaldo, Aguero, coasta etc. sorry if we spend so much on our defense and they cant perform their functions independently then I think we shd start playing our attackers in those positions.

GOD knows what wud hav happened if he hadnt inherited george Graham's defense as thats what i hav heard u ppl say.and maybe hes afraid that spending will expose his incompetence... if hes that a genuis that he shows himself to be (he stands on his opinion even when whole world think otherwise); then atleast arsenal twam shud be within some 5 pts of first placed teams for most seasons and hav regularly atleast a quarter final finish.he had shown glimpses of a changed attitude with ozil and Sanchez but i guess am wrong.arsenal first place in January when ozil was bought, ppl asked for striker, but this man showed himself to know more and failed again.a nd last year only club to not buy an outfield player #wow jus wow; like team was picture perfect....

If mom is spending money you don't have on baby clothes, a budget in black and white may be your best line of fiscal defense.

If you spend a lot of time at the pool or beach, the Swimmer's Defense shampoo is fantastic for washing chlorine and salt water out of baby's hair.

Even if the US zeroed the amount spent on defense, this wouldn't free up any money for other expenditures.

If you look at the history of United States defense spending, the percentage of GDP (3.3 %) is actually at a relative low point now.

At that point I said if she more concerned with spending more on defense and cutting the food stamp program I'll call in and ask her the following: «Mrs. Long, are you for a social safety net?»

During a Thursday budget hearing, for instance, House Appropriator Rep. Ken Calvert (R - CA) told Defense Secretary James Mattis, «Most if not all of us agree that the base on defense must go up... but the funding on military can not be obtained on the back of nondefense discretionary spDefense Secretary James Mattis, «Most if not all of us agree that the base on defense must go up... but the funding on military can not be obtained on the back of nondefense discretionary spdefense must go up... but the funding on military can not be obtained on the back of nondefense discretionary spending.

While the Trump Administration has proposed deep cuts to nondefense discretionary spending to allow a defense increase, that approach has been widely rejected, if for no other reason than it would require the politically impossible hurdle of 60 votes in the Senate.

But if the president's request is considered without the new mandatory spending, science and technology budgets for NIH, NASA, USDA, and the Department of Defense «would all drop markedly,» Hourihan and Parkes conclude, «erasing many of the gains since FY 2013.»

The automatic reductions — if triggered — would take the form of equal cuts (in dollar terms) in defense and nondefense spending starting in fiscal year 2013.

If you've spent any time gaming on the PC or even major consoles it's hard not to have come across Orcs Must Die, Robot Entertainment's third - person take on tower defense gameplay.

June 27, 2012 • With dramatic cutbacks in defense spending looming if Congress fails to reach a budget deal, defense systems manufacturer Lockheed Martin says it will be forced to send layoff warnings to more than 100,000 employees this fall.

Defense spending, tax codes, and the like can do nothing if the population is without knowledge.

If the super committee doesn't have an agreement by November 23, it will trigger $ 1.2 trillion in automatic across - the - board cuts — half from defense, the other half from domestic spending like education — to take effect in 2013.

Defense costs can be staggering, so this benefits both you and the insurer — you're not worried about burning through your policy limits with the cost of a lawyer and the insurer is able to continue to defend against a suit for which they may be responsible even if they spend more than the policy limits to do so.

If the government plans to cut defense spending, it means that a lot of revenue could be lost for companies that do business in this space.

What happens if defense spending really falls off a cliff?

Furthermore, with deficits at record levels and interest payments on the national debt set to rise at a real rate of 13 percent annually over the next 10 years, interest payments could reach $ 725 billion and exceed defense spending by 2018 [13] if not sooner.

You can think of the index mutual fund «broker penalty» this way: If a consumer spends $ 4 for a loaf of bread when an identical loaf on the same shelf cost $ 2, it is no defense for a «bread broker» who recommends the $ 4 loaf to argue that it cost more because the baker has higher production costs than the baker of the $ 2 loaf.

If they are then they'll get a die to roll regardless of whether they choose to defend or not, but if they should opt to spend some gems on defending then they'll get the die listed on their defense action, plus extra dice from one equipment card, such as a shield or a sworIf they are then they'll get a die to roll regardless of whether they choose to defend or not, but if they should opt to spend some gems on defending then they'll get the die listed on their defense action, plus extra dice from one equipment card, such as a shield or a sworif they should opt to spend some gems on defending then they'll get the die listed on their defense action, plus extra dice from one equipment card, such as a shield or a sword.

- the 18 returning classes were chosen by seeing which popular classes would fit with the game - they also wanted to include classes to cover roles that the roster was lacked - the Pugilist class was added because the first group of classes selected did not include any with bashing and binding attacks - War Magus was added because the Medic was the only healer class in the roster at that point - they couldn't simply include all popular classes as that would have skewed the balance of the game - as for the Hero class, they with balanced offensive and defensive capabilities, but this made things to similar to other classes - this was rectified by adding after - images and other skills with good synergy - when an after - image appears, it does the same skills as the Hero, except on the following turn - it becomes possible for skills that usually can not be used multiple times in a row to be activated multiple turns in a row - it also means skills that only have an effect for one turn can be extended to two - after - images use not only the Hero's own class skills, but also their subclass skills - if the subclass is an Imperial, the Drive skill can be used multiple times in a row - when using Hero as a subclass to Nightseeker, the character can cover the Nightseeker's weaknesses of having low defense - after - images can also help increase the chances of inflicting status ailments - subclasses can be used to make up for weakness - Swordsman, a class that can learn speed and accuracy boosting skills, would be a good subclass for the Gunner - Reaper as a subclass for War Magus would allow that character to use the scythe's skills to inflict status ailments - the skill tree is slowly unlocked as a character grows - there are more skills that make jobs» individual styles stand out more, or expand the player's choices - the skill tree is also made so that there are less requirements to learn specific skills as compared to 5 - this makes it easier for players to get the skill they want without spending large numbers of skill points on lower skills - it's now easier to put points into skills, which makes re-specing easier - the team faced difficulty in balancing classes that were never meant to be alongside each other - they are doing their best to ensure that they keep the individual classes» identities intact

If the defense had gone forward, whether the jury ruled in their favor or not, it would have made settling the other cases impossible — they would have spent the next five years in court.

What would become of the economies of Phoenix, AZ and Colorado Springs, CO if we cut back on defense spending, only a paltry $ 600 or so billion as it is?

Environmentalists since the early 1970s had argued more generally that the world would be more secure if it spent less money on military defense and more on defense against pollution and other environmental dangers.

Mackinac's director of labor policy is Vincent Vernuccio, who chairs a committee of the labor task force of the Bradley - supported American Legislative Exchange Council and previously has worked at the Bradley - supported Capital Research Center and Bradley - supported Competitive Enterprise Institute... MCLF spent much of last year helping to defend the new right - to - work law, in policy and legal arguments, as well as in the larger public discourse in the state and nationally... MCLF is working with the Bradley - supported National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation on this and several other legal matters surrounding implementation of right to work in Michigan... On education, among other things, Mackinac is analyzing mroe [sic] than 200 collective - bargaining agreements (CBAs) in the state, covering some 75 % of the state's public - school students, to see if and if so, how, they are adhering to the teacher - tenure and - evaluation policy changes.

(I know, it's a very imperfect world, and my reasoning would radically reshape all public spending, because we have a moral obligation not to spend money on defense that would do more good if spent on child poverty.

I hold special scorn for those who want to tear away funding for programs that mostly benefit the disadvantaged, because this is pure gamesmanship — if politicians were serious about balancing the budget, they'd either tackle defense and entitlement programs, or do something that would be much, much better for the economy than slashing government spending: raise taxes on the wealthy.

If we're talking cutting - edge issues, either new to the courts we practice in front of or on the cutting edge of Supreme Court and federal circuit precedent, you're spending days, weeks, hundreds of hours as an office scouring the record, researching these issues, getting out ahead of the defense bar, the blogosphere, and Main Justice.

«I would recommend spending a couple of years at a public defender office or as an associate with a more established defense attorney, but if you are dedicated I have no doubt that you will gain the same experience learning from your fellow members of the bar, you need only reach out to enough of them.»

According to Robert Perry, legislative director for the NYCLU, current indigent defense costs in New York total $ 460 million to $ 480 million, suggesting that the state would pay that much if it assumed full responsibility for indigent defense spending.

Defense costs can be staggering, so this benefits both you and the insurer — you're not worried about burning through your policy limits with the cost of a lawyer and the insurer is able to continue to defend against a suit for which they may be responsible even if they spend more than the policy limits to do so.