Served as second - chair trial counsel and secured
defense verdict following seven - week jury trial in the California Superior Court for the County of Orange of action for strict and negligent products liability and negligence based on allegations of design defects, manufacturing defects, and warning defects.
Not exact matches
But what
followed was completely expected: a vow from one of his lawyers, Steven F. Molo, that the
defense would file «vigorous post-trial motions» seeking to have the
verdict set aside.
In the ordinary course of affairs, the
defense lawyer will request that the judge poll the jury
following the
verdict.
In the most recent epsiode, What Went Wrong (Air Date: 12/11/11), a team of criminal
defense lawyers, and investigators, look for a way to have a judgment thrown out
following a guilty
verdict.
Litigation Department Co-Chair David Lender and Antitrust Litigation partner Eric Hochstadt have been named «Litigators of the Week» by both The AmLaw Litigation Daily and Global Competition Review for securing a complete
defense jury
verdict for C&S Wholesale Grocers
following nine days of trial in an antitrust class action in Minnesota federal court.
An experienced trial lawyer, he has pursued or defended numerous nine - and eight - figure cases, which includes obtaining a full
defense jury
verdict following a multi-month trial for an institutional client facing $ 100 million in contract and business tort claims.
Obtained a
defense verdict for a railcar manufacturer
following an eight day trial in a wrongful death case tried in Greene County, Arkansas.
On April 19, 2018, Weil secured a complete
defense jury
verdict for C&S Wholesale Grocers
following nine days of trial in an antitrust class action in Minnesota federal court.
Obtained a
defense verdict in favor of a major Orlando theme park
following a seven - day jury trial.
Defense verdict for a manufacturer of welding supplies
following a trial before Judge Ramy I. Djerassi in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.
Defense verdict for a welding rod manufacturer
following a two week trial in Philadelphia County before Judge Ramy I. Djerassi.
Received a
defense verdict in a first party bad faith case tried in Philadelphia
following the preclusion of plaintiff's bad faith expert, which was upheld on appeal.
Served as lead counsel for the defendant and achieved a
defense verdict on behalf of a debtor bank holding company
following an advisory jury trial involving a claim by the FDIC for more than US$ 500 million.
The settlement
followed Fish's strategic victory in a motion in limine and related Daubert motion to exclude, as unreliable science, faulty expert testimony and a complete
defense verdict of no causation at the first and only bellwether trial.