Sentences with phrase «defense verdict in favor»

A California jury returned an 11 - 1 defense verdict in favor of Nissan North America, Inc. in the case Steiner v. Nissan.

Obtained a defense verdict in favor of a major Orlando theme park following a seven - day jury trial.

Obtained a defense verdict in favor of the railroad company after an eight day jury trial.

After seven days of testimony and arguments, we received a complete defense verdict in favor of our client.

Not exact matches

For example, on a scale of 1 = Excellent and 5 = Very Poor, jurors gave defense attorneys, on average, a competence score of 1.68 when they returned a verdict that was completely in favor of the defendant, 1.95 when they returned a split verdict, and 2.23 when they returned a verdict that was all in favor of the state / plaintiff.

However, even in the categories where jurors come close to rating both sides equally, the plaintiff attorneys are still not rated as low as the defense attorneys when the verdict is not returned in their favor and they are rated significantly higher than the defense attorneys when the verdict is returned in their favor.

If the jurors rated similarly situated attorneys equally, as one might expect, the lines on the graphs would appear as a perfect «X.» One would expect the defense attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the plaintiff attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the defendant on all counts and the plaintiff attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the defense attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on all counts.

Received a defense verdict on jury trial in favor of an employer accused of employment discrimination by the EEOC.

On January 12, 2018, Scott Sasser obtained a defense verdict in his client's favor in Lee County, Alabama.

Provided research, briefing and trial support, including drafting of jury instructions, trial brief, and motions in limine, in a case in Mayes County, Oklahoma, in which a defense verdict was obtained in favor of a loss prevention investigator who was an employee of a shoe retailer.

Stokes v. Ford Motor Co., 368 Mont. 365, 300 P. 3d 648, 2013 MT 29 — Obtained unanimous defense jury verdict in favor of automobile manufacturer, upheld on appeal.

Mr. McConnell has also successfully tried cases including a complete defense verdict on behalf of a national retailer in a discrimination, harassment and retaliation case in Los Angeles Superior Court, a complete defense verdict on behalf of a contractor on a claim for unlawful retaliation in San Diego Superior Court, and a directed verdict in favor of a home builder on claims for breach of contract and failure to pay wages.

The case was tried reverse bifurcated and after phase I the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, finding that the decedent's mesothelioma was not caused by his asbestos exposure.

Obtained a defense verdict in Massachusetts Superior Court in favor of a multinational high - tech services company and its Chief Financial Officer in a case involving discrimination and retaliation claims brought by a former senior executive seeking a seven - figure award.

After two week jury trial, awarded complete defense verdict ($ 0.00 award) in favor of architect - client in construction litigation lawsuit involving allegations of architect's professional negligence.

However, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, based on the plaintiff's inability to establish that her damages were a result of the accident.

No Bucks County case made it to a jury, according to the statistics, and six of the eight verdicts in Delaware County were in favor of the defense.