The Global Child Initiative aims to help Canada and other signatory governments to the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child identify and correct weaknesses and
deficits in government services that impact children.
Not exact matches
While prosperous by African standards, the
government has worked to ensure inflation is kept
in check and that basic
services and job opportunities are available to S.A.'s poor, putting strain on the
deficit.
The
government is on track to beat its
deficit target for the fifth year
in a row, which would result
in the accumulated
deficit being more than $ 24 billion lower than it otherwise would have been, while investing
in key public
services.
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, Treasury Board President Tony Clement and International Trade Minister Ed Fast are expected to retain their portfolios, according to
government sources, as the Conservatives work to eliminate the
deficit, re-engineer the public
service and conclude major trade agreements
in time for the 2015 federal election.
She called on the
government to clearly outline the impacts on jobs and
services of any potential cuts
in Thursday's budget, as the Conservatives chip away at an estimated $ 26 - billion
deficit.
There is also no doubt that without these tax cuts the
government would have been
in a much better fiscal position to deal with the 2009 - 2010 recession; that any resulting
deficit, would have been eliminated much earlier than 2015 - 16, and without the need for draconian cuts
in federal programs and
services.
Standard & Poor's Ratings
Services on Friday cut its credit rating on Saudi Arabia, saying the tumble
in oil prices is driving a wider
government deficit.
Of course, it is true that population growth of any kind puts pressure on infrastructure, but
in reality falling investment
in public
services represents a political choice by the current Conservative
government, which has opted to spend the tax revenues generated by immigrants and refugees on tax cuts for businesses and reducing the
deficit rather than expanding healthcare and education provision.
He insisted on sticking to Darling's
deficit reduction plan and argued that Labour should run for the next general election committed to leaving the current
government's cuts to public
services in place.
«The
government talk about care closer to home, but the
deficits mean the investment
in community
services isn't taking place.»
Most of the schemes, including the 600,000 - strong civil
service scheme and the NHS scheme covering 1.3 million employees are unfunded and paid from the
government's annual tax receipts, while the 1.6 million workers
in the local
government scheme are facing a funding
deficit.
'' «notes the threats to the future of the Royal Mail and welcomes the conclusion of the Hooper Report that, as part of a plan to place the Royal Mail on a sustainable path for the future, the current six days a week universal
service obligation (USO) must be protected, that the primary duty of a new regulator should be to maintain the USO, and that the
Government should address the growing pensions
deficit; notes that modernisation
in the Royal Mail is essential and that investment must be found for it; endorses the call for a new relationship between management and postal unions; urges engagement with relevant stakeholders to secure the
Government's commitment to a thriving and prosperous Royal Mail, secure
in public ownership, that is able to compete and lead internationally and that preserves the universal postal
service; further notes the Conservatives» failure to invest
in Royal Mail when they were
in power
in contrast with Labour's support for both Royal Mail and the Post Office; and notes that legislation on these issues will be subject to normal parliamentary procedures.»
Now, as the
government takes an axe to public
services,
in a bid to reduce the
deficit, the trade union movement is leading the fight to defend those most at risk.
The
government claims that the fee increases are justified to fund the modernisation of HM Courts & Tribunals
Service and to help plug a
deficit in funding.
We have a new opportunity for this to occur now with new investment, and whilst we are still
in a tight fiscal environment to address the
government deficit, let's work together to spend resources wisely to ensure we can create successful outcomes
in the future that build upon the solid foundations and expertise existing
in community controlled health
services.
As part of the federal welfare reform of 1996, Congress recognized the need to promote responsible fatherhood as a way to support child wellbeing.2 During the 106th Congress (1999 - 2000), Congress provided funding to the National Fatherhood Initiative (NFI), a non-profit organization that works with
government agencies, the military, corrections departments, and community organizations to create fatherhood programs.3 Concurrently, Congress also provided funding to evaluate the Institute for Responsible Fatherhood and Family Revitalization's fatherhood program, signaling the federal
government's commitment to researching and assessing the impact of responsible fatherhood programs.4 Although Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama included funding for responsible fatherhood programs
in each of their budgets, it was not until the 109th Congress of 2005 - 2006 that the Healthy Marriage Promotion and Responsible Fatherhood (HMPRF) grants program was created and funded under the
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 beginning
in FY2006 and continuing through FY2010.5 The program was subsequently reauthorized under the Claims Resolution Act of 2010.6 The HMPRF programs support healthy marriage, responsible parenting, and economic stability activities, and are funded through the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services Administration of Children and Families» (ACF) Office of Family Assistance (OFA).7 The HMPRF programs have continued to receive funds through FY2016.8 Healthy Marriage and Relationship Education grantees, the New Pathways for Fathers and Families grantees, and Responsible Fatherhood Opportunities for Reentry and Mobility (ReFORM) grantees are currently funded from FY2015 through FY2020.9
He adds that cuts
in government services and economic development programs, along with the rescinding of tax cuts for individuals
in a few years and the impact of tax reform - induced
deficit on inflation, will weaken the impact of the after - tax income boost on homeownership.