When the coin was
defined as a virtual currency by the U.S Treasury, it was predicted that the coin will take the world by storm.
A cryptocurrency can be
defined as a virtual currency that is generally used as a medium of exchange.
Not exact matches
In doing so, Judge Weinstein effectively affirmed the CFTC's 2015 finding that bitcoin and other
virtual currencies are «properly
defined»
as commodities, a pivotal interpretation that could set a standard for cryptocurrency prosecution at large.
The bill
defines virtual currency as «a digital representation of value that can be digitally traded and functions
as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, or a store of value but does not have legal tender status
as recognized by the United States government.»
In granting the CFTC's preliminary injunction, Judge Weinstein agreed with the agency's 2015 finding that bitcoin and other
virtual currencies are «properly
defined»
as commodities.
The draft also allows for a bit of flexibility; provisional registrants are
defined as those who register with their states to conduct
virtual currency business but do not conduct business in such great volume
as to be licensed, nor a low enough volume to be considered exempt.
It reads, «The CFTC first found that Bitcoin and other
virtual currencies are properly
defined as commodities in 2015.»
Judge Weinstein's ruling is important,
as it is the first federal court decision to address — and agree with — the CFTC's determination that
virtual currencies are commodities
as defined by the CEA.
«2 On September 17, 2015, the CFTC issued a settlement order (the CFTC Order) in an enforcement action finding for the first time that «Bitcoin and other
virtual currencies are encompassed in the definition and properly
defined as commodities.
The proposal
defines «
virtual currencies»
as a digital representation of value that can be digitally transferred, stored or traded and accepted by natural or legal persons
as a medium of exchange, but does not have legal tender status.
It is the Registrant's view that Bitcoins should not be regarded
as coins, or otherwise
as collectibles, for purposes of section 408 (m), because Bitcoins are a
virtual, rather than a fiat
currency (see «Bitcoin Value,» above) and,
as such, do not take the form of tangible personal property, in contrast to a coin or any of the other items
defined as a «collectible» under Section 408 (m).
The IRS
defines the cost basis of the
virtual currency as its fair market value when it was received.
Entitlements include but are not limited to paid and free downloadable content; unlockable content; digital content, including additional or enhanced functionality, content subscriptions;
virtual assets; rights of use tied to unlock keys or codes, serial codes and / or online authentication of any kind; in - game achievements;
virtual points, coins, or
currencies (each individually or collectively
defined as ``
Entitlements include but are not limited to paid and free downloadable content; unlockable content; digital content, including additional or enhanced functionality, content subscriptions;
virtual assets; rights of use tied to unlock keys or codes, serial codes and / or online authentication of any kind; in - game achievements; virtual points, coins, or currencies (each individually or collectively defined as «Dragon Foundry Virtual Currency&r
virtual assets; rights of use tied to unlock keys or codes, serial codes and / or online authentication of any kind; in - game achievements;
virtual points, coins, or currencies (each individually or collectively defined as «Dragon Foundry Virtual Currency&r
virtual points, coins, or
currencies (each individually or collectively
defined as «Dragon Foundry
Virtual Currency&r
Virtual Currency»).
Following the enactment of the amended Fund Settlement Law in May 2016, which newly
defined «
virtual currency»
as a means of settlement, the sale of
virtual currency as defined under the new Fund Settlement Law will be exempt from JCT.
The new law
defines virtual currencies as «asset - like values,» allowing digital money to be used not only to buy goods and services but also
as an alternative for legal tender through purchases and trades.
Virtual currency,
as generally
defined, is a digital representation of value that functions in the same manner
as a country's traditional
currency.
The law
defines «
virtual currencies»
as any type of digital representation of value that is used
as a medium of exchange, unit of account or store of value, and is not recognized
as legal tender by the United States government.
Both of these failed bills would have enacted a «
Virtual Currency Act» which would «prohibit a person from engaging in any virtual currency business, as defined, in this state unless the person is licensed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight.
Virtual Currency Act» which would «prohibit a person from engaging in any virtual currency business, as defined, in this state unless the person is licensed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight
Currency Act» which would «prohibit a person from engaging in any
virtual currency business, as defined, in this state unless the person is licensed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight.
virtual currency business, as defined, in this state unless the person is licensed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight
currency business,
as defined, in this state unless the person is licensed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight.»
The current Governor, Roy Cooper, signed HB 229 into law July 12, 2017 which
defines virtual currency traders
as money transmitters required to obtain a license and imposes additional insurance requirements on
virtual currency transmitters.
Cryptocurrencies have been
defined as property under the Internal Revenue Code, and
virtual currency investments are treated
as capital assets just like other types of valuable property.
The bank said in its update: «These regulations do not cover «
virtual currency» which is
defined as any type of digital unit used
as a medium of exchange, unit account, or a form of stored value.»
Digital
currencies are
defined in the document
as «convertible
virtual currencies, including crypto -
currencies or similar concepts where the concept is accepted by persons
as a means of payment for goods or services, a unit of account, a store of value or a commodity.»
Two and a half weeks ago, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed paperwork in federal court (California Northern District Court, Case No. 3:16 - cv -06658-JSC) requesting John Does, United States persons who, at any time during the period January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015, conducted transactions in a convertible
virtual currency as defined in IRS Notice 2014 - 21.
The IRS states that «
Virtual currency,
as generally
defined, is a digital representation of value that functions in the same manner
as a country's traditional
currency.»
Nevertheless, currently, «cryptocurrency is not
defined as a financial asset or
currency and there is no code of ethics and no code of conduct for
virtual money investment in the FSS regulations».
For instance, Japan's revised Payment Services Act, enforced in April 2017,
defines cryptocurrencies or «
virtual currencies»
as a means of payment with proprietary value.
2A
Virtual Currency Exchange is
defined as an entity that conducts any of the following businesses (according to the Payment Services Act, Article 2, Section 7)
The 2012 ECB report
defined virtual currency as «a type of unregulated, digital money, which is issued and usually controlled by its developers, and used and accepted among the members of a specific
virtual community».