You said, «Then those atheists might be better
defined as agnostics.»
Then those atheists might be better
defined as agnostics.
Because neither the existence or non-existence of god can be proven, I choose to
define myself as an agnostic because it is the most intellectually sound position to take.
(I can't remember if you have formerly
defined yourself as agnostic or atheist, so I'm assuming athiest and am sorry if I'm assuming incorrectly.)
I define myself as an agnostic and admit that I'm not smart enough to figure out if a god exists or not.
Not exact matches
Merriam Webster correctly
defines agnostic as «a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (
as God) is unknown and probably unknowable.»
As an agnostic, I don't see any admonition by Jesus to help the poor and needy as being a recommendation to allow the government to define who is poor and needy and therefore deserving, and to define who has too much and therefore is obligated to giv
As an
agnostic, I don't see any admonition by Jesus to help the poor and needy
as being a recommendation to allow the government to define who is poor and needy and therefore deserving, and to define who has too much and therefore is obligated to giv
as being a recommendation to allow the government to
define who is poor and needy and therefore deserving, and to
define who has too much and therefore is obligated to give.
As an ignostic (not to be confused with «agnostic») I am forever open to the potential existence of «god», but I am unwilling to accept the common model as defined by the religionist or «spiritualist»
As an ignostic (not to be confused with «
agnostic») I am forever open to the potential existence of «god», but I am unwilling to accept the common model
as defined by the religionist or «spiritualist»
as defined by the religionist or «spiritualist».
This is the version of atheism that: * Redefines «
agnostic» to mean «there is no God»; *
Defines the belief in God
as a psychopathological issue that needs to be cured;
(I'm more
agnostic on that, mostly because I think that «capitalism»
as a real - world phenomenon is much less well -
defined than textbook definitions actually capture, but also because I'm frankly fairly ignorant on the topic.)