Sentences with phrase «defined as the concept»

The awards were named for the Greek word «Xenia,» which is defined as the concept of hospitality, or generosity and courtesy shown to those who are far from home.

It can be defined as the concept of applying game - design thinking to non game applications.

It can be defined as the concept of applying game - design thinking to non-game applications.

«Point And Click» Me To The Exit Please Synchronicity is defined as a concept stating that events are meaningful coincidences if they occur with no causal relationship but have...

Not exact matches

#WeAreWinter was certainly the most successful of all the campaigns we've done, and part of the rationale for why that is, is that it's a concept that defines us as a country.

Because of the uncertainties in the marketplace — and the very real threats to many companies» survival — many, many leaders see the concept of «culture» and the tasks of defining and managing it as luxuries that only get attention once more concrete and easier - to - measure objectives are handled.

The Ancient Greeks defined optimism as «the belief that our behavior matters,» which is a critical concept for helping individuals to remove limiting beliefs and to shift towards solutions - based thinking.

The Flipped Learning Network defines flipped learning as a «pedagogical approach in which direct instruction moves from the group learning space to the individual learning space, and the resulting group space is transformed into a dynamic, interactive learning environment where the educator guides students as they apply concepts and engage creatively in the subject matter» (Flipped Learning Network, 2014).

The flaws in these misrepresented concepts, as defined by the Pakistani investigative commission, must be highlighted.

For a believer this concept is unfathomable because all existence as we define it is within God's presence.

Henceforth, the right to abort was to be understood as a liberty interest under the Due Process Clause, which included (so the plurality opinion of the Supreme Court said) «the right to define one's own concept of existence and to make the most basic decisions about bodily integrity.»

The «Conviction of «Sin»» (I.E. esse: «essence,» «being») an immaculate concept flying in on the wings of a dove, say: certainly nothing one would conjure up without the help of Goedel's Theorem, might as well ask Joe Fish to define wet let alone conceive of dry: it makes no common sense.

In defining the complex notion of wisdom, Deane - Drummond introduces the concept of wisdom as an understanding of different facets of reality, a contemplative «way of knowing» lost by modern science with its focus on specific discoveries.

It is the concept that defines substance as self - contained and as the enduring bearer of qualities.

Other concepts are also discussed: The meaning of the Word «God, Monotheism, «God» defined, God's existence, Polytheism, Arguments for existence of God, Omnipotence, Omniscience, Immanence and Transcendence, Creation, and God as personal.

At the heart of such an understanding of Judaism was the concept of peoplehood, which Kaplan defined as «the awareness which an individual has of being a member of a group that is known, both by its own members and by outsiders, as a people.»

That being the system's intention, there are three questions we obviously can pursue: a) Does the system as system have integrity in that its concepts are so defined as really to serve as criteria?

Instead of using classical concepts of precisely defined x and p we will now say that the wave function describes the state of the particle as accurately as possible.

A model of this is the concept of bio-regions, which Berry defines as «identifiable geographical regions with mutually supporting life - systems that are relatively self - sustaining.»

While as a Christian I may fully embrace these concepts, I recognize that they are not objective, tangible events that can be subjected to and verified by the scientific method, what I would define as 100 % proof.

Evangelism as a working concept was born in this kind of world, and it was defined by this kind of world.

[Brightman's] notion of the Given as an intrinsic limitation of God's power, a passive element in his activity, analogous to sensation and emotion in us, can be defined and defended only in the context of an adequate analysis of what is or can be meant by «passivity,» «sensation,» etc.; and the exploration of such concepts taken in their most fundamental or general senses, as they here must be, can only amount to a metaphysical system whose defense is not merely empirical, since the very meaning of «experience,» «facts,» etc., will have to be grounded in this system.54

If liberty is defined without any ties to the «traditions of this country» as Justice Alito says, or to truth or nature, or to a common good, we will find ourselves «at sea» in a «postmodern» concept of liberty.

Place, as he freely confesses, «is a rich, thick concept which is notoriously difficult to define.»

I am not saying you define your god simply as a concept.

In a recent paper Rogers defines a person as a fluid process and potentiality «in rather sharp contrast to the relatively fixed, measurable, diagnosable, predictable concept of the person which is accepted by psychologists and other social scientists to judge by their writings and working operations.»

The very concept of oak - tree is defined both as an entity, and as the concept of an entity within a variability of fact, and also of environmental law within limits.

In the theory we are offering, since knowledge is by intuition and perception, not by abstraction of only part of the singular real, this ultimate universalism of the nature as sort or species, is said to be a singular real and also a concept defined within a distinct limit of formal variability, both as real, and also as concept.

Thus, in his comments on defining religion, Berger approvingly refers to Rudolf Otto's idea of the holy, and suggests in the light of that concept that religious experience must be recognized as distinct from «the experiences of ordinary, everyday reality.»

If you mean I would take aways someones freedom to yell «fire» in a crowed room where there is no fire, Yep, I would take that freedom away; however, if you see me debating and defending what I believe with someone who thinks different, and you define that as not willing to let people have freedom, then you misunderstand the concept of freedom.

For example, contact is defined in a processive fashion as experience, as defining the subject and simultaneously representing a point of view, which brings the concept of contact and prehension quite close.

And that is the concept that Bill Wilson spelled out on pages 43, 45, and 46 of the Fourth Edition and earlier editions of the Big Book when Bill spoke of a «Higher Power,» said he was going to talk about «God,» and then defined the «Power» as «God.»

The difference is as pervasive and profound as the difference between the experiences by which the two concepts are defined.

He defines «nothing» and other key concepts precisely so as to guarantee that only the physicist's methods he is comfortable with can be applied to the question of the universe's origin — and that only a nontheological answer will be forthcoming.

And concepts of good and evil can easily be defined as human (or hominid) created concepts that are necessary for forming civilizations.

But with the concept of Space - Time, as we have defined it, there comes into effect a harmonious and fruitful conjunction between the two spheres of rational experience and of faith.

Griffin defines this concept in various ways, but as applied to his critique of free - will theodicies, the illuminating power of a theodicy is closely tied to the degree to which individuals find it convincing.

This single relation — «contemporaneity» — has come to supplant the older relations simply because the older assumptions behind these relations have been dropped in favor of the more orthodox Einsteinian assumption that causality is intrinsically bound to spatio - temporal concepts in this cosmic epoch.14 Thus, Whitehead defines all occasions that are contemporary with M as lying in a single locus (PR 123 / 188), and all that are mutually contemporary as lying in a single duration (PR 125f.

Too often, we do not notice that we uncritically accept a certain concept of truth defined as adequation to real objects and as submitted to a criterion of empirical verification.

The untruth comes when «traditional marriage» is offered up as a term that defines a religious concept of a God - blessed union of a young man and woman who fall in love, get married with no prior sexual experience, have children and remain together into old age.

But in conclusion, he offers an escape hatch: It may be permissible for married couples to use barrier methods as long as they do so with the intent of «responsible parenthood» as that concept is defined, paradoxically, in Humanae Vitae itself.

Just as those who wrote the Biblical texts had no concept of the science that would prove the earth actually revolves around the sun, so they had no concept of homosexuality (which wasn't defined until the 19th century.)

Now — estoeric concepts such as «the soul» put aside for a moment (since The Bible states that nobody can know when ensoulment happens despite the many differing opinions from prominent theologians throughout the ages), what characteristics define a human being and how does a single cell possess them all?

The concept of «acquired freedom,» as Mortimer Adler defines it (in his two - volume The Idea of Freedom), is such a view, and this permeates much of theological as well as secular ethics, particularly of a Platonic - Augustinian variety.

What happens when we go deeper is that we see that globalization is part of a larger and broader concept of postmodernity — as an emergence from modernity into an as yet defined era in history in which a distinctive rationality of plurality and fallibilism sets in.

As to their presuming to set their destination, surely the editors can not complain about that, since they so strongly agree with the Supreme Court dictum in Casey that there is no higher truth than «the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.»

Indeed, as we made clear above, the Church ultimately rejects the concept of «sexual orientation» as something that defines a person.

Following T. Dobzhansky and F. Ayala, we may define the concepts of internal (or natural) and external (or artifactual) teleology as conceptually useful terms in describing causal features in biological and cultural evolution.9 Such a definition of internal and external teleology was recently summarized by Ayala as follows: 10

No longer can the world be regarded and defined only as the «material world» to be comprehended in «mathematical concepts,» or even only as the totality of the «properties of the universe» or the «course of events» (cf. TM 5).

When Whitehead defines feeling as «that functioning through which the concrescent actuality appropriates the datum so as to make it its own» (PR 164), he is signaling a shift from a «substrative» to a «functional» concept of feeling, of a kind which will have to be closely assessed.