We have wrongly
defined the problem of climate change, relying on strategies that worked previously with ozone, sulphur emissions and nuclear bombs.
It's all well and good to propose nuclear power as a technical solution to an objectively -
defined problem of climate change, and to point out that the greens have been the ones doing most to prevent progress in this regard.
the wrong cognitive choices in our attempts to
define the problem of climate change, by relying on strategies that worked previously with ozone, sulphur emissions and nuclear bombs.
Not exact matches
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or
climate change affecting the operations
of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost
of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance
of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost
of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact
of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated
problems or delays with the phased implementation
of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under
defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
Part
of the
problem is semantic: «Abrupt» and «catastrophic» are inavoidably subjective terms, although the former is a bit more prone to definition (e.g., any
change of climate state involving a rapid transition from one state to another, although
of course we then have to further
define «rapid» and «
climate state»).
The two
defining problems of today are
climate change and inequality, BC FED president Irene Lanzinger told a crowd
of about 100 people at a Thursday event co-hosted by the BC Federation
of Labour and several other labour organizations.
The two
defining problems of our time are
climate change and inequality, BC FED President Irene Lanzinger told a crowd
of about 100 people at a Thursday event co-hosted by the BC Federation
of Labour and several other labour organizations.
The
problem was narrowly
defined whereas it should have started out saying «there are a number
of or many causes
of climate change among which manmade causes are but one,
climate science should be directed at understanding all causes
of climate change and appropriate measures
defined to best address including proper assessment
of cost / benefit.
Even if it could be demonstrated that
climate change had caused a particular
problem, the «crime» that the «victim» is the subject
of is not
defined by the action
of the perpetrator, but by the status
of the «victim».
The Democrats are
of the mind that human - caused
climate change is one
of the major
problems facing the country / world today, describing it as «an urgent threat and a
defining challenge
of our time.»
In comparison to messages that
defined climate change in terms
of either the environment or national security, talking about
climate change as a public health
problem generated greater feelings
of hope among subjects.
But it only really covers part
of the
climate change problem, the
define the
problem part.
The dual
problems of ending poverty and dealing with
climate change represent «the
defining issues
of our generation,» said John Roome, World Bank senior director for
climate change.
And so,
climate change is a civilization challenging
problem of distributive justice and no matter what ethical considerations are taken into account to
define an arguably distributively just allocation
of ghg emissions targets among nations, many national commitments utterly and obviously flunk any ethical test.