«There is nothing inherently wrong with
defining aerosol changes to be a forcing, but it is practically impossible to accurately determine the aerosol forcing because it depends sensitively on the geographical and altitude distribution of aerosols, aerosol absorption, and aerosol cloud effects for each of several aerosol compositions.
Thus, for example, the climate sensitivity (1.7 — 2.6 °C for 2 × CO2) estimated by Schmittner et al. [94] is due largely to their assumed approximately 3 °C cooling in the LGM, and in lesser part to the fact that
they defined some aerosol changes (dust) to be a climate forcing.
Not exact matches
Also, due to the multiplicity of anthropogenic and natural effects on the climate over this time (i.e.
aerosols, land - use
change, greenhouse gases, ozone
changes, solar, volcanic etc.) it is difficult to accurately
define the forcings.
Improved empirical data can
define climate sensitivity much more precisely, provided that climate - induced
aerosol changes are included in the category of fast feedbacks (human - made
aerosol changes are a climate forcing).