Yet, as Lumen Gentium reminds us, «this infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed His Church to be endowed in
defining doctrine of faith and morals, extends as far as the deposit of Revelation extends» and no farther.
For life within the Catholic Church, the stumbling - block as regards change in the Church's doctrine is not so much the question of defined dogmas as other doctrines of the Church in dogmatic and moral theology which are taught authoritatively but which in principle can not count as
defined doctrines of faith or as irreformable dogma.
The heart principle of the Reformation is the denial of Magisterium in the Church, the power to
define doctrine of faith and morals with infallibility in the name of Christ.
It met in the Vatican in 1869 - 1870, and its most notable decrees, later promulgated by the Pope, declared «that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when in discharge of the office of pastor and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority,
he defines a doctrine of faith and morals to be held by the universal Church, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, is possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that His Church should be possessed for defining doctrine regarding faith or morals; and that therefore such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are irreformable of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church»; and that the Roman Pontiff has «full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which belong to faith and morals, but also in those which relate to the discipline and government of the Church spread throughout the world.»
Not exact matches
Without denying the place that Protestant reformers occupy in evangelical
faith, it should be said that classic Christian teaching, whether in the realm
of doctrine or ethics, is best
defined not against the backdrop
of the sixteenth century, but rather in the light
of the broader apostolic tradition.
(Mt 16:17) Thus papal infallibility is effectively exercised when according to the «manifest meaning and intention» (Vatican II, Constitution on the Church, n. 25)
of the teaching, the Pope invokes the authority
of Christ to confirm and
define a traditional
doctrine of faith or morals.
The Office
of Peter (the ecclesial role assumed by the man who becomes head
of the Church) involves the ability and responsibility to
define truths concerning
doctrines of faith and principles
of morality, especially to «confirm the brethren» (Luke 22:32) when there is disagreement on important issues.
Thus papal infallibility is effectively exercised when according to the «manifest meaning and intention» (Vatican II, Constitution on the Church, n. 25)
of the teaching, the Pope invokes the authority
of Christ to confirm and
define a traditional
doctrine of faith or morals.
This view
defines Christian
faith in terms
of continuity in a mode
of existence, while recognizing the constantly new intellectual task
of articulating
doctrines required and supported by it.
We do not need to reject or twist
defined doctrines in order to present our
faith credibly in this new age
of discovery, neither do we need to distance ourselves from the scientific consensus about the natural world.
He explores four
doctrines the affirmation
of which
define «boundaries»
of Christian
faith: sin and salvation, biblical revelation, the Trinity, Christology, and then describes the ethical outgrowth
of accepting these
doctrines: piety, polity, policy and program.
The
doctrine itself must be the same identifiable,
defined teaching that is the historic Catholic
faith, but this has to be projected against the backdrop
of the vast new vista
of creation revealed by modern science.
Faith has been
defined as «strong belief in the
doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof» and «firm belief in something for which there is no proof».