Its definition as a pollutant relies entirely on its alleged causation of significant global warming and on the additional assumption that a warmer climate is damaging.
Not exact matches
In essence, the EPA can only regulate «
pollutants», and so whether they have juristriction of CO2 emissions depends on the
definition of CO2
as a
pollutant.
======================================================================= The EPA
definition of CO2
as a
pollutant, legal or not, is a travesty of politics over science.
In the WGII Report, where they are examining the impact of global warming
as it relates to soot and other «
pollutants» it is the opposite, with a
definition of particulates but none for aerosols.