«Those principals should apply equally to the games at issue and to
the definition of gambling in New York.»
As I see it, this falls within Idaho's
definition of gambling.»
According to a court document released in the New York litigation, South Carolina's
definition of gambling «includes betting money on the outcome of any «game,» regardless of the skill involved in the game.»
State Sen. Mike Ranzenhofer, a Republican from Erie County, introduced a bill seeking to change the state's
definition of gambling to incorporate language from the federal government, carving out draft fantasy sports companies.
As a result, the state law meant poker still fell under
the definition of a gambling business.
Although Weinstein ruled DiCristina hadn't broken federal law, the state of New York has a stricter
definition of gambling.
According Netherlands» public broadcaster NOS, the Dutch Gaming Authority looked at 10 popular games with loot boxes and found that four of them met
their definition of gambling.
According Netherlands» public broadcaster NOS, the Dutch Gaming Authority looked at 10 popular games with loot boxes and found that four of them met
their definition of gambling.
This is very different from the approach used in many other jurisdictions, such as the USA which relies on a predominance test, where a dominant element of skill over chance takes it outside
the definition of gambling and all the regulatory consequences of that (including prohibition if there's no regulation)
The New Zealand Department of Interior Affairs, which oversees its gambling licensing, told me that it «is of the view that loot boxes do not meet the legal
definition of gambling.»
Not exact matches
Heeb's aim was to convince the judge that poker was predominantly a game
of skill and didn't fall under the
definition of illegal
gambling.
I believe it was Einstein who said «doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the
definition of insanity»... so we could even go so far as to say that continuously
gambling with your Forex trading account is not only financially problematic, but it's insane.
But clearly, not everyone agrees with that position and the Belgian authorities may decide that any game with randomized boxes
of items falls under the
definition of «
gambling».
Queensland's Office
of Liquor and Gaming Regulation admitted that loot boxes «may constitute an interactive game within the
definition provided in Queensland's Interactive
Gambling (Player Protection) Act 1998.»
I'll certainly agree that they can lead to the same negative outcome, but the distinction is important because think
of everything that would be screwed over if we allowed opinions on the internet to change the very
definition of what
gambling is...
A game
of chance to win a prize in the UK is subject to regulation (and with it compliance, fees and taxes) under the 2005
Gambling Act, where this
definition includes skilled games with a small element
of chance unless so insignificant as to not matter.