Not exact matches
That's the
definition of a
straw -
man argument, and really renders your entire post moot.
In his argument, he posits a
definition of «machine» that is something
of a
straw man (or
straw machine, I should say).
I am always amazed at the ignorance
of people who do not understand the basic
definition of atheism, and who must resort to
straw man attacks against atheists.
I must say that what I find somewhat unfortunate in the interesting account provided here (other than the already - noted focus on the weakest arguments, such as name - calling, rather than trying to address the strongest ones — surely this is the very
definition of the
straw -
man fallacy?)