Worldwide economics (imo) will force countries to look after their own interests to an increasing degree in the future and poorer countries will need to fend for themselves to an ever increasing
degree over the next few decades.
2.5
degrees over the next few decades?
We don't immediately grasp the importance of limiting climate change to a couple of
degrees over the next few decades.
Not exact matches
There are multiple mitigation pathways to achieve the substantial emissions reductions
over the
next few decades necessary to limit, with a greater than 66 % chance, the warming to 2
degrees C — the goal set by governments.
I can understand that approaching equilibrium takes a long, long time, while TCR gives a better measure of what will happen
over the
next few decades (and that technology and society may be very different in 200 years time); but on the other hand, I thought nations had agreed to try to limit global warming to less than 2
degrees C overall, and not just to limit it to less than 2
degrees C by 2100.
James Annan has repeatedly represented the «IPCC consensus» for warming
over the
next few decades to be 0.1 to 0.2
degrees Celsius per
decade.
This report, «Climate Stabilization Targets: Emissions, Concentrations, and Impacts
Over Decades to Millennia,» provides a fresh degree - by - degree guide to impacts on river flows, rainfall, coasts and other factors that matter enormously over the next few decades as human populations cr
Over Decades to Millennia,» provides a fresh degree - by - degree guide to impacts on river flows, rainfall, coasts and other factors that matter enormously over the next few decades as human populations
Decades to Millennia,» provides a fresh
degree - by -
degree guide to impacts on river flows, rainfall, coasts and other factors that matter enormously
over the next few decades as human populations cr
over the
next few decades as human populations
decades as human populations crest.
No one in his right mind (least of all the ocean dwellers) cares a whit whether or not the ocean is warming by a
few thousandths of a
degree over the
next several
decades.
It is important and worrying to a
degree, I think it was thought that it wasn't going to get any worse and it was just a matter of waiting for the CFCs and the resultant chlorine atoms to leave the system
over the
next few decades.
I can understand that approaching equilibrium takes a long, long time, while TCR gives a better measure of what will happen
over the
next few decades (and that technology and society may be very different in 200 years time); but on the other hand, I thought nations had agreed to try to limit global warming to less than 2
degrees C overall, and not just to limit it to less than 2
degrees C by 2100.