Sentences with phrase «degrees per century»

Tez, The data shows that on average over a 3 year period the temperature is rising at 2 degrees per century.

Then even though there would be long term warming (2 degrees per century), there would be cooling over particular periods of 10 or even more years.

Well, the UAH mid troposphere trend is 0.5 degrees per century; the lower troposphere trend is almost three times greater at 1.4 degrees C per century.

From 1850 to 1975 the trend was a very modest 0.25 degrees C per century, with 95 % confidence limits between 0.19 and 0.3 degrees per century.

Most of that warming has appeared in the last 35 years (1.7 degrees per century).

Instead of a huge trend range of +80 degrees per century acceleration or a -80 degrees per century acceleration, the 20 - year trend variation is much narrower, from +0.5 to +2.5 degrees per century.

Right now, temperatures are increasing at a rate of about 1.5 degrees per century, based on the satellite data.

I see that the gridded data attributed to Dr. Jones et al on Mr. Warwick's web site indicates this region warmed by 1 °C degrees per century.

Thanks Steve, so far it has a R2 that only a climate scientist could love, but the trend is -1.1 degrees per century.

``... but the trend is -1.1 degrees per century.»

I'm glad you confirm that Hansen's «slight» error was overestimated by a full degree in 20 years, as shown, or five degrees per century.

This amounts to a temperature rise at the rate of 5 degrees Celsius per century, compared to the actual temperature rise of 0.7 degrees per century.

Or at about two degrees per century.

I looked to see how large the difference was, and compared that to the differences in the early and late trends (0.15 and 0.66 degrees per century, a change of 0.45 ° per century) in the Loehle / Scafetta results.

I calculated the trends (in degrees per century) for the first hundred years and compared them to the trends for the last 58 years.

(Oddly enough, doubling from quarter of a century to half a century still gives almost exactly 1.4 degrees per century.

Had I used that as a precise boundary, that would take us back to 1987, which shows an increase of almost exactly 1.4 degrees per century.

Other than a single datapoint (blue column), all the long - term temperature trends for the left chart exhibit warming greater than 1.5 degrees per century; in contrast, the majority of trends (blue columns) for the right chart are below 1.5 degree per century, despite faster CO2 growth and the associated higher atmospheric CO2 levels.

=== > The 1 - year trends (moving 12 - month) reach the greatest extremes, with excesses coming close to either a cooling trend of minus 80 degrees per century or a plus 80 degrees warming trend per century - amazingly, within a few years of each other

The study, done by Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, shows that Since 1976, temperatures have been increasing at the rate of four degrees per century.

Objectively, the small trend increase of +0.40 degrees per century over the last 25 years is well within known natural variation.

It is very plausible that natural decadal fluctuations are 0.1 to 0.2 degrees, averaging to zero over longer time periods, while the CO2 trend is measured in degrees per century.

Two degrees per century is eight - tenths of a degree by 2050, so my questions were: What would I do differently if I...

And according to the latest NOAA - NCDC data, during that same 15 - year time period, U.S. temperatures were actually on a cooling trend - to the tune of a minus 1.9 F degrees per century.

Finally, I see that the eyeball line of best fit through the model outputs on the 30 - year graph implies a trend of approximately 1.5 C degrees per century.

Currently, instrumental and satellite temperature data exhibit rates of 0.5 to 1.8 degrees per century that are well within the assemblage of natural centennial events.

Warming and cooling rates range from 0.01 to > 3.0 degrees per century.

The global average shows a trend of less than 1 degree per century!

Per NOAA, prior to the modern era's huge industrial / consumer CO2 emissions, the global ocean warming was significantly greater, approaching the 2 degree per century rate in 1945.

The audience were startled again when Lord Monckton showed a slide indicating that the rate of warming since 1950 was equivalent to little more than 1 Celsius degree per century, while the rate of warming the IPCC predicts for the 21st century is three times greater.

But can you point to a half century at any time in the past millennium where fitting a trend line gives a slope (up or down) of anywhere near a degree per century (0.01 degrees per year or 0.1 degrees per decade)?

Man made global warming appears to consist of adding noise and 1 degree per century to a temperature data - set

The warming is a not particularly dizzying one twenty - fifth of a Celsius degree over ten years, equivalent to two - fifths of a degree per century.

Instead they make the extraordinary claim that somehow, for some reason, and coincidentally just when the calibration period ended, humans immediately changed the trend of the data by half a degree per century.

The world is still warming at a long - term rate of about half a degree per century, but it will reach a maximum within 50 years, then cool for nearly 500 years with superimposed 60 year natural cycles.

-LSB-...] I would guess on the order of 1 degree per century.

Not exact matches

On average, the models predicted an 11 percent increase in CAPE in the U.S. per degree Celsius rise in global average temperature by the end of the 21st century.

Pages 12 - 13 ignore all this and instead use «a constant - rate warming» of 1.8 degrees C per century «based on actual observations.»

This calculates into warming rates of 0.5 degrees C to 0.7 degrees C per century.

With warming rates of 0.5 to over 1.3 degrees C per century this has caused considerable alarm for many.

Correction, my post # 5 should read 2 degrees Centigrade of warming per century instead of per decade.

Walt, go read lucia's blog, Blackboard, and see that it will only take the first ten years of this century to falsify the IPCC's idea that CO2 causes a 2 degree Centigrade per century rise of temperature.

I would bet that the IPCC prediction for the first three decades of this century as I understand it (0.2 degrees per decade) overstates the amount of global warming we will actually experience.

Numbers are even provided — so many degrees per year, decade, century etc..

-- snip - «Arctic temperature increases between 1971 and 2003 might spell trouble if they continued, even though the rise was below what computer models had predicted: 1.4 degrees F per half century.

It does show that positive feedbacks are dominant, and for timescales of anthropogenic global warming about 2 to 4.5 degrees Celsius per doubling, and a bit higher if you include century - timescale «slower feedbacks» such as ice sheets.

It might be a degree or two (Celsius) per century, but anyone who says he knows is committing fraud.

(Or is maybe «recent» not the appropriate word...) The IPCC thinks the global average temp has increased about 3/4 degree C. the past rough century, which is about 0.0075 Â °C per year.

We got to curb down the 0.2 or 0.3 degrees C per century, because it may be a problem in one or two hundred years, where alarmist environmentalists refer to this low quality biased science.

I am no longer a «believer» in human caused global warming, there is simply no evidece for more than a small fraction of one degree C per century — and without that and the fertilisation effect of the increased CO2 that we are enjoying, the human race would starve.