Sentences with phrase «deity on»

Each one depicts an ancient deity on the handle.
Atheists just have one more deity on their list of «I don't believe in that» than you do.
[43:84] He is the only One who is a deity in the heaven and a deity on earth.
They wanted to get up in the morning and take a gift to their deity on their way to work, and pay for a successful day, and then go about their day know that they had done their duty for god.
, that can only be true if you redefine «saved» to mean «nothing in their lives was bettered significantly and there was no detectable influence of a deity on them nor on their well - being.»
Maybe, if such a universal concept is behind invoking the deity on money, then the motto ought to read «In Gods We Trust», eh?
For a group of people with an omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent deity on their side, everyone sure does seem really defensive and fearful.
The demolishing team did place the statues of four Hindu deities on the side but the residents accused them of taking away their gold jewelry and crowns.
(Leviticus 19:28) For example, there were times when the Egyptians tattooed the names or symbols of their deities on their breast or arms.
(CNN)-- For centuries, artisans have been crafting statues of Hindu deities on the banks of the Hooghly River in Kolkata, India.
Two gorgeous large - scale sculptures, one in the back gallery on the first floor and the other one on the second floor, recall religious deities on litters.

Not exact matches

A «religion» does not have to focus on a god / deity.
We are not intimidated by «god» or «him» or any other man - made deity that you insist on incorrectly capitalizing.
Repent for what and to whom... to an imaginary deity for imaginary crimes... the whole god thing exists only between your ears Billy... put the book down... and think rationally... can people walk on water??
Furthermore, to base one's ID position on a non-literal reading of Genesis, incorporating the central tenet of special creation by the biblical deity, is, in fact, an exercise in bible - based reasoning.
Not everyone believes what you believe, and we are sick and tired of you people forcing your views on everyone else then screaming about being persecuted when people say «no, we don't want to listen and we're tired of you putting your rules and the name of your deity all over everything».
simple logic would dictate that the deity that killed every living thing on earth, demanded and participated in genocide and slaughter is the evil deity.
Note that her core beliefs on liberty, tolerance, and so forth do not seem to have undergone a conversion - just her belief in the existence of a deity.
I'm not a GOPer, nor do I play one on TV «what sort of deity lays traps tor those it makes «in it's own image»?»
On Sunday, he arose, «as the solar deity for the new season.»
Not sitting in a building on sundays, not praying to any deity, not bashing anyone for your closely held opinion, on either side of the coin.
All we do is discount the idea that there is some deity out there with all the right answers for every single human, and that some writings or leaders here on earth somehow convey those answers.
And mythological stories may be based on actual individuals whose life stories are greatly embellished over time so that they gain miraculous powers and even may become deities in time through apotheosis.
Ignoring runaway processes like cancers, and diseases that waste tissue and muscle, let's focus on the DESIGN of that which is created in the perfect deity's «image and likeness».
So, while their invisible / nonexistent all powerful deity was helping him score a silly TD how many children were r@ped and murdered and how many thousands lay on the ground with bloated bellies begging for a handful of rice?
It's the Western atheists who've got the weirdest original ideas on deity because you guys are warped.
In the end all you are doing is just relying on your own belief because even though there is no proof that that there actually is no deity who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop our faith in said deity, since there is thus far no irrefutable proof that there is such a deity, that you then come to a conclusion that there is no such deity, all you are doing is just relying on belief just like I'm relying on belief and that what it really boils down to is just that it is all a matter of belief.
We rely on the strength of other human beings our ourselves to pull through, not a man - made deity.
i suppose it's possible that some deity exists without anybody being able to perceive it, but having an entire worldview hinge on this possibility seems reckless, especially when we attribute a bunch of specific claims, details and an ever - evolving incredible story to this purportedly imperceptible being.
We clearly recognize that, regardless of how they are allegedly posthumously judged, young children and those adults with various mental diseases / defects lack the capacity to tell right from wrong, i.e. the deity who allegedly wrote a moral code on their hearts failed miserably.
On the other hand, an intelligent deity should accept the «I don't follow any of them since there was no proof» argument.
Get high on science, really living and enjoying life, not running in fear, or bowing to some fukking «lord / goD almighty do - nothing deity.
There is no deity looking on to be «alienated from».
And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.
It is interesting to see how nonbelievers are so quick to define what believers opinions are on issues like creationism, evolution, a deity, etc..
And I'd like to be a fly on the wall when you're standing before him trying to explain why you worshipped the wrong deity your whole life.
In the modern period the classical Western deity more and more took on the garb of the One who ultimately validates scientific and industrial progress, including not only much that was truly progressive, but also the industrial rape of nature and, ultimately, through a variety of corporate structures, the oppression of the poor, and the dispossessed.
God — the deity that had to kill everything on the planet except those few in the ark?
The general pattern in Arabian Empire conquests, was, as long as 1 local deity was identified, to say «well you worship Allah by another name, so * carry on *», (as long as monotheism was embraced).
I think you will see quite a few posts by believers on here that claim that prayer works, that they have had dozens of prayers answered personally by a deity.
Funny... we put your deity into the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954, pit it on out money in 1956... and our country started going to hell in the 1960's.
Generally, they include the following in their gospel definition: - human sinfulness - the deity of Jesus - the death of Jesus on the cross for our sins - the resurrection of Jesus - the necessity of faith in Jesus to receive eternal life
God is not a baby - killing deity, who seeks to exact revenge on His enemies for a crime many decades old, but is a self - sacrificial, enemy - loving God, who would rather die for His enemies than see His enemies die.
Kant's moral argument for God demands a deity who exercises power in the traditional manner, but his principal moral theory requires that he become a process theist on the question of divine power.
Until the current deity of choice (The God of Abraham) actually shows himself, I for one will not accept the talking snakes, virgin births, and condemnation of personal freedoms that surround the belief in him — like stoning someone for working on the sabbath, or killing children who curse their parents, or the rules of owning slaves, all concepts clearly stated in the Old Testament.
And finally its rather presumptuous to decide on who God would let into Heaven and just the same I would not put words in the mouth of a deity I might have explain myself to later.
Atheists refuse to accept the potential existence of any kind of deity simply based on the faith of the presenter.
Belief or disbelief in a deity isn't a light switch you can turn on and off.
So based on the contradictory, ambiguous, brutal, misogynistic, scientifically historically and factually incorrect content of the bible, it amazes me that christians would actually worship such an incoherent, raving, nasty, petulant, sad.istic, confused, lying deity.
Our own clever deities peer down on us from their benches and professorial chairs and stock exchange seats.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z